Skip to main content

Full text of "De Appiani elocutione [microform]"

See other formats


MA S TER 

NEGA TIVE 

NO. 93-81310-22 



MICROFILMED 1993 
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK 



as part of the 
"Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project" 



Funded by the 
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES 



Reproductions may not be made without permission from 

Columbia University Library 



COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 



The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United 
States Code - concerns the making of photocopies or 
other reproductions of copyrighted material. 

Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and 
archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other 
reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the 
photocopy or other reproduction is not to be **used for any 
purpose other than private study, scholarship, or 
research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a 
photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair 
use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. 

This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a 
copy order if, in its judgement, fulfillment of the order 
would involve violation of the copyright law. 



A UTHOR : 



KRATT, GOTTFRIED 



TITLE: 



DE APPIANI ELOCUTIONE 



PLACE: 



BADEN 



DA TE : 



1886 



COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 
PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT 



Master Negative # 



BIBLIOGRAPHIC MICROFORM TARGET 



Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record 



Restrictions on Use: 



i Z8 






Kratt, Gottfriod# / i 

De Appiani elocutione, Dissertatio philologa ... 
tradita a Godofredo Kratt ••• Baden-Baden, 
Sommermoyert 1886« i 

viii, 68 p* 23|- om« 



Thesis, ileidelberg^ 



Vol« of thesea. 




TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA 



REDUCTION RATIO: \ijK 



FILM SIZE:___35^i!?jr!. 

IMAGE PLACEMENT: lA (^A) IB UB 

DATE FILMED:__i-_2_L-]^ INITIALS_ M^JlS.- 

FILMED BY: RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS. INC WOODBRIDGE. CT " 




c 




Association for information and Image Management 

1 1 00 Wayne Avenue, Suite 1 1 00 
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 

301/587-8202 




I* 4 



Centimeter 

1 2 3 4 5 

iiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiii 



LU 



6 7 8 9 10 11 

iiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliii 



12 13 14 15 mm 

iiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiii 



TTT 



Inches 



1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 

1 2 



^ 



I I I 



I I I 



1.0 


i^ 2.8 
I& lp-2 


l.l 


yf lp-6 


1.25 


1.4 



2.5 



2.2 



2.0 



1.8 



1.6 



I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 

5 



I 




MfiNUFflCTURED TO flllM STflNDflRDS 
BY flPPLIED IMflGEp INC. 




I « 



>t)-^ 



DE APPIANI ELOCLTIONE 



i 



DISSERTATIO PHILOLOGA AD RITE OBTINENDOS SUMMOS 
IN PIIILOSOPHIA HONORES SCRIPTA. 



AMPLISSIMO IN 



yNIVERSITATE RUPERTO CAROLINA HEIDELBERGENSI PIIILOSOPHORUM ORDINI 



MENSE APRILI ANNl MDCCCLXXXV 



TRADITA A 



/ ♦ 



GODOFREDO KRAH, 

CONSTANTIENSL 



"'^«^^♦^S:-^ 



), 



BADEN-BADEN. 

VERLAG DER EMIL SOMMERMEYERSCHEN BUCHHANDLUNG. 

1886. 



I 



V4 



t 



y 



tft> 



CURTIO WACHSMUTH 



Frederico Schoell 



praeceptoribus dilectissimis. 



Druck der J. B. Metzlerachen Biuhdruckerei in Stuttgart. 



•4f 



V/ f 



s\ 






\ 



Index librorum, qui in liac dissertatioiie notis 

attributis significantur. 

1) M. = Appiani historia Komana ed. L. Mendelssohn I. II. (p. 1 
—564, p. 565 — 1189) Lipsiae 1879. 1881 (cuius editionis sunt paginae, 
quas referam). 

2) M.i = Mendelssohn in Museo Khenano, vol. XXXVIII, p. 120 sq. 
(de codicis Peiresciani lectionibus). 

3) M.2 = Mendelssohn in „Actis soc. phil. Lips.", vol. VI, p. 347 sq. 
(Coniecturae). 

4) M 3 = Mendelssohn in Jahnii annalium vol 119 (a. 1879), p. 822. 

5) Schw. ^ Schweighaeuser in editionis suae (a. 1785editae) voll. 1. 1]. 
0) Schw. ^ — Schweighaeuser in editionis vol. III (adnotationes). 

7) Schw.2 = Schweighaeuser in indice graecitatis (vol. III. editionis). 

8) B. = J. Bekkerus in editione sua. 

9) Di. 3= Duebnerus in editione Didotiana. 

10) N. = Nauck (cf. M. I. p. XXVI). 

11) Ni. =: Nipperdey. 

12) Sch. = Schenkl in Bursiani annalibus, XI. (vol. 34—37) 11. 12. 
(a. 1884), p. 169 sqq. 

13) C. — Candidus in versione sua, cf. M. I. p. XX VIII. 

14) Cob. = Cobet, cf. Sch. 

15) vH. = van Herwerden, cf. Sch. 

16) St. = Stephanus. 

17) Mu. = Musgravius. 

18) R. =: Reiskius. 

19) H. B. = Henricus Berg in tirocinio philol. sodalium regii semi- 
uarii Bonnensis, Berol. 1883. 

20) H. B.^ — H. Berg in dissertatione Bonnensi a. 1883 „de par- 
ticipii temporum usu Appianeo." 

21) Kaelker =z Frid. Kaelker, quaestiones de elocutionc Polybiana, 



!/ 



fi 



C: 



— VI — 

cum epimetro de hiatu in libris Diodoris Siculi, in studiis Lipsiensibus, 
111, 2, a. 1880., p. 217—320. 

22) Stich = Jo. Stich, de Polybii dicendi genere, in actis seminarii 
philol. Erlangensis, II, a. 1881, p. 141-212. 

23) Loesch = Loesch in censura, quam egit de editione Mendelssohniana, 
in indice philologorum, XIV. 10. 11., a. 1884, No. 93; p. 514. 

24) Krebs = F. Krebs, de praepositionum usu Polybiano, apud 
Schanzium (Beitrage z. hist. Syntax der griech. Sprache, I., Wurzburg 1 882). 

25) Krebs^ = F. Krebs, die Praepositions - Adverbien in der spat. 
hist. Graecitaet, I., Munchen 1884. 

26) Hu. =r Hultsch, de hiatu apud Polybium, Philol. XIV. (a. 1859), 
p. 288-319. 

27) Stein = Henr. Stein in editione sua Herodoti, Berol. a. 1856 in 
lucem profecta. 

28) Kr. = K. W. Krueger in gramm. Graecae suae Lips. a. 1875 
quintum editae parte prima. 

29) Kr.i = K. W. Krueger in Thucydide suo Berolini a. 1860 
tertium edito. 

30) K. = Raph. Kuhner in gramm. Graeca sua a. 1870 iterum edita. 

31) Wi. = Winer, Grammatik des neutest. Sprachidioms, Lips. 1867, 
edit. VII. 

32) Mul. = F. W. A. MuUach, Grammatik der griech. Vulgaersprache 
in hist. Entwicklung, Berol. 1856. 

De reliquis horainibus qui commemorabuntur, inspicias aut Sch. aut 
M., de codicum compendiis M. p. XXVIII. De codicum ratione egit 
Mendelssohn in museo Rhenano XXXI, p. 201 sqq. et in editionis prae- 
fatione. 

Cetera eompendia. 

f. = falso 

r. = recte 

0. = offendit 

d. = delevit 

m. = mutavit 

c. = coniecit 

s. = servavit 

V. = vertit 

Mafo. = Mendelssohnius alii falso offenderunt 

A. = Appianus. 



> \ 



i 



Non tam de observata vel observanda quam de servanda Appi- 
ani elocutione agam hoc libello; nam cum totum Appianum ratione et oram- 
matica et critica pertractarem, moles quaedam mibi orta est olKservati- 
onum non tam ad Appiani proprietatem dicendi pertinentium quam ipsam 
illam proprietatem ab hominum doctorum coniecturis defendentium tanta, 
ut mihi persuaderem, exemplis allatis non sine fructu posse demonstrari, 
quantum valeret ad evitandas vanas coniecturas scriptoris usus dicendi 
accurate observatus. 

Neque tamen id neglegendum esse putavi, ut ex usu accurate obser- 
vato aliquid certe redundaret ad constituendum posteriorum scriptorum 
Graecorum usum universum. Cuius aedificii fundamenta ut his demum 
diebus ponuntur, ita de Appiani elocutione perpauca constat adhuc esse 
animadversa (cf. Sch. p. 172); quae suo loco commemorabo; item qiiid qnis- 
que editorum aliorum hominum doctorum coniecerit, referam. 

Sed priusquam ad singulas res tractandas transeam, hoc premendum 
mihi videtur, neque de Appiano Herodoti Thucydidis aliorum imi- 
tatore (cf. Sch. p. 177) — pro huius libelli spatio — me voluisse agere 
neque grammaticamAppianeam scribere aut valuisse aut voluisse; sed 
quaecumque aut Appiani propria esse aut ob ipsam proprietatem non per- 
spectam ab hominibus doctis in suspicionem vocari intellexeram , ea sola 
fere persecutus comparando explicando condonando statuebam defendebam, 
emendando denique, si fortuna tulisset, restituebam. 

Talia autem proprie dicta inveni in eis, quae pertinerent 

L 

1) ad genus. 2) ad numerum. 3) ad casus. 4) ad gradus compa- 
rationis. 5) ad articulum. 6) ad pronomina. 7) ad tempora. 8) ad infini- 
tivum. 9) ad participium. 

IL 

10) ad asyndeton. 11) ad anaphoram. 12) ad figuram xara avveatv. 
13) ad ellipsin. 14) ad anticipationem. 15) ad attractionem. 16) ad bra- 
chylogiam. 17) ad pleonasmum. 18) ad anacoluthiam. 



W. 



I. 1 






— VTII — 



ni. 



19) ad adverbia. 20) ad negationes. 21) ad praepositiones. 22) ad 

coniunctiones. 

IV. 

23) ad verbonim significationem. 24) ad verborum structuram. 25) ad 
verborum collocationem. 

Quae, quantum de singulis animadverti, deinceps iam tractabo et ita 
tractabo, ut, ubicunque loco quodam quemlibet hominem doctum falso aut 
oifendisse aut delevisse aut mutavisse aut coniecisse aliquid ex ipsis locis 
iuxta allatis apparebit, defensionis causam non addam. 

Locorum autem, qui propria continebunt, numeros, quantum potero, 
enumerabo vel certe numerabo omnes; quaepropria non erunt, satis habebo 
exemplis illustrasse. 



> 

i 



V 



\ 



^ 



I. 
1) De genere, 

Neutrius generis usum valde amavit A.; ac primum quidem sal- 
pius posuit neutra adiectivorum vel participiorum singulari numero pro 
substantivis abstractis (item Polybius, cf. Kaelker p. 282); legimus igitur 
67, 22 STil TM KaQX^^oviiov xov(povq), 77, 22 tw (fdonovq) xal TaXamoQ^p, 

169, 11 To V dnavd^QooTiov, cf. etiam 728, 8. 843, 7. 844, 1. 873, 4. 
1131, 24. 241, 3, quo loco M. to a^fsvsQov sinQsnsg f. m. in t6 (xcpeTEQov 
€VTiQ€7i(ag (sc. SiaTid^ea^ai); quibus locis omnibus significantur mores 
hominum, cf. Kaelker ibidem. — Quo accedunt loci 148, 12 {t6 d(T(fakeg) 

170, 17 {tov naQaSo^ov Trjg nQO^Vfitag) 196, 1 {iovto t6 (S0(f6v) 209, 14 
{to dSoxrjTov Tfjg 8(f6Sov) 209, 15 {to naQaSo^ov tov SQyov) 219, 7, 10. 
272, 5, 7. 404, 20. 575, 2. 670, 16. 738, 10. 813, 17 {^ihxiag ti v€(6- 
T€Qov) 829, 9 {sg t6 tcov i€iq(ov €vxoXov) 855, 24. 1066, 9 {Sva^Qyeg 
^v, cf. 997, 11 Tfi Taiv€Qym Tfjg dX(joa€(og) 1067, 5. 1096, 11. 1136, 17. 
852, 13. 843, 22. 273, 20. — t6 avf^KfSQov legimus 322, 3. 825, 8, 
To avv€iS6g (pro conscientia) 143, 5. 305, 16. 588, 26. 644, 22. 757, U. 
799, 19. 1070, 20. — 

Deinde haud raro usu veniunt neutrius generis pronominum et ad- 
icctivorum casus obliqui, et singulari numero positi, velut 81, 10 {fisxQt' 
Tivog) 218, 17 {ot}S€v6g nQOxonTOVVog avT(j)). 288, 16 {ovx ovTog avvotg 
onot xara(f€vyoi€v). 828, 3. 446, 17. 328, 17 1). 624, 6. 589, 2. 801, 5 
{ovS€v6g xakhsQovfxsvov, Mfd. et Nfm., cf. etiam Xen. Hell. 3, 1, 17, 
ubi €xaXlt€Q€tTo pro passivo legitnr). 847, 7. 1088, 10. 1089, 12. 555, 2 
{ovx dnsairi Ttv6g, E. f. adiecit syxeiQiiji^ccToc) 119, 11. 668, 18. 623, 14. 
58, 5; et plurali, velut 158, 25 {sv dn(jQotg). 255, 11 {sm xQ€iaa6v(ov) 
220, 20 {tcov nX^ovcov). 235, 14 {vnSQ toov dUoTQtcov) 858, 4 {Totg 
noXXotg Svax€Qdvag) 1015, 9 {xat t6 Ttfirjfia avT^f twv naTQ({)cov sx 
Tcov xotvcov sxQtvav dnoSotvat xQ^^^tcov, M. r. 0. in /(j^^^crrcov, cf. 947, 21 
fiij ii€Taax€tv tcov naTQ(^coVy et 1036, 6, ubi M. post snt Ta T(av nol€- 

1) cf. de fig. Y.ata avvaaiv. 



ii 



• « ^ 



- 2 - 

fiiiov f. desideravit xrTJfiaia) 132, 21 (naaiv eroifia, M. f. mutare voluit 
in ig ndvva ecoifia) 715, 5 (dieh^e r^v ^otdrjv snl dreXeai ndai, Mrs. 
contra Blokium, qui c. ngdyfAaai). 975, 16. 1059, 17 (Tva xal rdov evav 
%iuiv xoiV(ovd5fX£v Vfitv, Mfo. et vHfc. „xar« toSv evavumv'^ ; opponuntur 
enim inter se dxCvdvvov (poQov et rwr evavucov, quare Schwrv. „ut ex 
adversis etiam tempestatibus commune vobiscum detrimentum senti- 
remus' et Sch. p. 179. 180 „ut adversarum etiam rerum vobiscum par- 
ticipes essemus*) 1056, 12 (eyCyveTO ydg — eceQa efHfvha ofioia, ac()airj- 
yov fiev ovdevog ovioq enl ndaiv waneq exetvoigy Mfc. exeivwv, 
Schwfc exelvoi^)) 1120, 4 (eXnC^ovveg avToTg avioig dyanrjaeiVy Mfd. 
avvoig^) 1144, 7. 

Tum A. neutra nonnunquam ita usurpat, ut aut ipsos significent 
homines aut ad homines sint referenda: 279, 7 (okCyov d^ oaov eaM^pQovei, 
.%dg nvXag dnexkeie, cf. 806, 17 ti xaO^agov zov nXrj&ovg et 1035, 7 
noXv S^ ^v 6 xal zoTg noXefiioig eavvo enezQenev) 645, 12 (6 noXefiog 
e(pd^eiQe ndvra, wv ye xai fivQiot etc. , Mfc ndvtag) 715, 3 (ndvca 
xarakveiv pro ndviag xavaXveiv, quod M. f. restituit) 1046, 19 (6 Se 
^Avctcviog ndvca ^v, Mfc ndvvi^y vHfc. ndvrr], cf. 710, 11. 821, 22). 
661 , 6 (noXefitov oidev f^v en nXijv 2eQT(oQCov) 367, 18 (to tqCtov 
TOVT(ov exTetvav) 1100, 5 (to x€(fdXaiov tov noXefiov Aetxtov yeyovevai) 
210, 6 (^AadQOvfiag fibv eaTt t6 tov noXefXov xe(fdXaiov) 988, 19 [en(o- 
Xovv al aQxal Ta eXev&ega) 930, 16, 17 (ra dyQKOTeQa c(ov ^aQ^dQ(ov) 
833, 6 (TTlg fiev EvQcinrig noXXd fidQ^aQa eX(6v, Mfc. ed^vri) 714, 14 
{el Tt r^v noXtv xaTa^id^otTO, Mfo. 

Aliter comparati sunt loci 31, 9 (yavQov 6 vevtxrixcog) 466, 2 (tovto 
etvat civ nvQacv, Mfo.) 1016, 25 (tovto yaQ inavdaTaaCg laTt , Mfo.) 
944, 21. 1153, 3. 172, 22 (aweTaQaaaov deC Tt xat xceCvavceg inavrj- 
eaav^), cf. 396, 15 deC Tt evoxXcSv). 1053, 8 (ot xacd ra (fQOVQia, noXXd 
ovTa, Mfo.) 213, 17 (Schw. R. Mfo.?) 

Porro saepius neutra adiectivorum invenimus, ubi exspectamus ad- 
verbia, velut 763, 1 (t(ov tnnecav (ipaxv cd ne^d nQoXa^6vTO)v) 75, 15 
(iaefivvveTO ofiota) 242, 17 (cd evayxog cavTa) 203, 16 (to ndfinav) 
1048, 22 (t6 fiexQt nXeCaTov) 850, 8 (cd elxoca). 250, 18. 589, 7. 636, 9. 
289, 11 (ytyvofxevov Se TovSe nvxvov, Mfc. nvxvCog, cf. 693, 12 dn6 tov 
Seovg, noXXov a(fiatv — intaTuvTog) 870, 10 (ovSev intfxefinTcov — 



1) cf. de ellipsi. 

2) cf. de pronomine. 

3) cf. de ellipsi. 



) 



-< 






3 — 



yevofieviov). 1 70, 28. 579, 25 ^). Comparari denique inter se possunt loci 
211, 9 (t6 dxQtfieg tcov ytyvofxev(ov pro dxQt^cog zd ytyvofxeva) et 1102, 12 
(to T^g dnoxQtaecog dxQt^eg aQa ovx etScog), qui tamen differunt a locis 
antecedentibus. 

Saepissime vero adiectivorum vel pronominum neutra pro substan- 
tivis coniungit cum^^substantivorum casu genetivo, velut 235, 8 (t6 noXv 
Trjg dQx^jg) 242, 6 (ig ToSe tvxi^q) 609, 16 (t6 Xotniv Tfjg aTQaTtdg) 
223, 7 (ig eaxacov dnogCag) 260, 13 (dnoQCag iv TOVTOfi) 294, 13 (iv 
T(oSe dnoQCag) 855, 2. 545, 19. 586, 18. 10, 17. 279, 15. 280, 7. 
294, 13. 639, 23 (iv ToawSe xtvSvvov, Nfm. in xtvStmo) 639, 26. 659, 5. 
704, 4. 999, 15. 876, 24 (otg u Xoyiafxov §a^eog ^v, Lennep f. c. ^d^og) 
233, 4 (r« dxQrjaca crjg XeCag). * 

Omnino denique neutris Appianum libentissime uti quo magis con- 
firmem, ni loco non indigni mihi videntur, quos adiciam: 

88, 5 (ra fiev tujv ""AacanaCcov ^v aQtaca, Mf. desideravit eQya 
ante ^i', cf. 678, 10 xal cdSe ^v xal covSe tov eTovg iv ^I^i^tCcc, Mfo.). 

261 , 7 (d(fQdxTotg xat xeQxovQOtg xat aTQoyyvXotg noXXoTg) et 
309, 6 (dXXotg pQayvTFQotg noXXoTg^)) Mf. desideravit nXoCoig, cf. 406, 8 
(ovSev rjv dyQeTov pro ovSev ^eXog tjv dxQsTov, Mfo., cf. 555, 2). 

284, 20 (Std Tov neaovTog — ^tdaaaS^at xal iaSQafxeTVy cf. 312, 9 
c6 Sianenccox6g tov StaTetxCafxaTog), 

336, 2 (^ovXofxevovg Tt nQea^evaat, Mfo. in Tt, cf. 172, 22. 396, 15). 

276, 22 (ig Tovco S^ r]fxTv dvdyxr^g d(fTxTat, St. f. desideravit cd 
nQdyfiaca), 227, 18 (inet Se eToifxa r]v avToTg, Mfo., Schrs. , ct. Sch. 
p. 174 et Kr^ II 3, 3 et I 46, 1) 1022, 16 (xal ndXtv r> dnoQa Totg dfX(fl 
Tov Bqovcov, Schwfm.) 1068, 24 (dfxrixccva S' ^v avTw, cf. 1136, 9). — 

182, 24 (tm naQ ix^Qov, sc. X6y(^^ , St. Mfo.) 804, l (t(ov ofxco- 

flOaflFVO)V, SC. OQXCOVj Mfo.). 

172, 20 (XC&ovg int cdg fxr^xfxvag d(ftevceg noXXd avvFTQi^ov, 
Mfo.) 759, 26 (t6 fieTa^v (DaQadXov Te noXeoig xat ""EvtnFoig noTafxov^ 
Mf. des. neSCov) 182, 13 (f^yeCQeTo t6 'PcofxaCcov) 234, 21 (t6 nQog 
xdQtv del intxQaTet) 209, 24 (ca TTJg yvo^fxrjg iQco). 179, 19 (cd avT(ov 
inoCovv) 179, 24 (iv dnaqt ToTg ^AvvC^ov) 859, 10 (t6 Tf^g C^fxCag). 
586, IL - 

cf. Stich p. 161. 



1) cf. de accusativo. 

2) cf. de fig. nata avveaiv. 



( 



f\ 



'b 



- 4 — 

2) De numero. 

Pluralis numerus nominum abstractorum frequentissime usu venit 
apud Appianum (cf. K. § 348b 3c, p. 15, Kr. § 44, 3, Wi. p. 166, 
Stich p. 151), ac primum quidem ita, ut significentur complures notionis 
abstractae modi, status, casus: 83, 25 (xQeXm) 150, 28 {BmvoCaig) 695, 21. 
875 18 237, 1. {vag evjiQaiCaq) 246, 11 {tag eimQa^Cag) 221, 19. 
253,' 19. 67, 20. 354, 11. 241, 26. 222, 10. 583, 6. 263, 27. 295, 5. 
302^ 10. 497, 4 {ilev^eQCaig , Mfo.) 694, 12 {xag (pdoTt^iag) 758, 10 
(xaQKnv) 1157, 1 {di aneiQCav oSwv xai svsSQag, Zippel, f. C (fo^ov 
ivsdQag')) 817,21 {zotg ift^otg) 1161,11 (yoVojv) 828,26 {sotxev-Ta 
yeyevrifiBva .... tov Satfioviov SQya etvat, Mfo. cf. 844, 3. 1160, 15. 
163, 1, quo loco Mfo. in ozav at (pdkayyeg SQycov sxoivrat) 834, 14 
{evnQa^Catg xal xvtaig) 12, 15 (xQOVOvg). 

Deinde plurali abstractorum exprimitur iteratio quaedam; quo per- 
tinent loci 193, 14 {yvvatxG^v v^Qetg xat naQ&eviov dnayuiyaC, Naber 
r m. v^Qtg in v^Qetg, cf. 859, 9. 1059, 21) 203, 20 {ml ^Qag ij keri- 
XaaCag cf. 201, 25) 500, 8 {acpayaC) 567, 3 (cf. 939, 7, a M. recte 
coUatum ad 830, 22) 569, 5. 576. 14. 578, 9. 580, 14. 695, 26.^936, 19. 
25, 22. 217, 12 (Schwrm. vnoaxeaet in vnoaxiaeai) 252, 22 (f(>y« no- 
;if>a)v, B. Mfo., cf. 286, 4, ubi Mrs. noleiiog contra Musgravium, 817, 18 
ndvxa i^nXfiaat noXeiiwv, 903, 24 Svo ^aav ol noXe^ot, 909, 19, quo 
loco noXsfi(p Mfin. in noXefxdp, cf. 1092, 5 Cfv.; accedit 1116, 7, ubi 
Mfo. in noXffiovg) 396, 14 {xvQToXoyCatg xat ^deCaig) 641, 14 {kca^ov 
d(psaetg) 645, 10 {Xvfiag xal ^avdvovg xal Srjfievaetg) 686, 23. 694, 12. 
695, 26. 714, 5. 719, 5. 1098, 10. 1160, 10. 

Ad complures denique homines referendus est abstractorum nommum 
pluralis 12, 22 {xa&d xat rwr 'ElXriViav Ttatv inl Ta cvofiava f^aav 
intxliaetg, Rfm.^)) 46, 11 (ir« iieyii>ri fieC^ovg) 503, 18 {iv ^noxpCatg 
ivCd^evo) ^ll, 13 {avTov 6 aTQavog iv ahCatg elxev) 571, 24 {&eQa- 
n6vv(ov, dxtvSvvcog av^ofisvcov Std vdg davQaveCag) 876, 2. 939, 26. 
964, 12. 1087, 9 {ovve vov Xtfxov vt TsXog f^v ovTe t(ov ^avdT(ov, 
cf. 645, 10) 391, 16. 1046, 3 {ol S' dveood^ovvTo fxsv inl noSag, Mfc. 
noSa) 1092, 22 {TotdSe dXXrjXotg nQoatovTeg dno ve Tijg aToX^g xal 
T(av axrjfiaToov nQoaneSeCxvvvvo, Mfc. tov axfifiavog, cf. 217, 12) 1168, 20 
{xotvf^ ^ i?6(ov . . . d(pe^rjvat tcov aTQaTetcov, Mfc. r^g aTQaveCag, 



1) cf. de brachylogia. 

2) ct de praepos. 



-^ 



y 



i 



y 



— 5 — 

cf 571 24) 946, 3, 4 ((»? xal wv tmdmv uvac eg ra« (ptdaxa? ifi- 
/?«2«v Mfc. «? TW (ftdax^v) 308, 17 {ToaoeSe avQavov, fiiqTe nt^egav 
.•.xXe(novTog inl Totg eqyoii ^Te vvxTa, Mfc. inl rq, %<->)• - Quae 
tamen divisio non ita est severa, ut singula genera locorum non possmt 

partim inter se misceri. — >>>,,- 

Jam adnotandi sunt loci 687, 23 (roiv %mv «« Tovg Sa^iaei^ 

inaivovvto,v, Mfc. dri^wTmv) 841, 3 (r«e «ez«e exaevov «:^v ^u>[i6v 

ixfhovv) 672, 5 (Siifioi et dex^l), ubi nomina extant haud abstracta ). 

ixdteQo/. autem legimus non de factionibus sed de smgulis hommi- 
bus adhibitum 1107, 19. 988, 12. 1096, 17 (quibus locis Mfo.) 1142, 24. 
1161, 15, exaacog plurali numero 137, 1. 26, 16. 94, 10 cet., dnee pro 
oneo (quod referatur ad totum enuntiatum) legimus 158, 24 (Mfm.), 
TavTa pro TavTo 743, 18 (Mfo.), pro tovto 715, 5 (B. Mfm.), TdSe 
pro T,;Se 882, 3 et 851, 18 (quibus locis Mfo., 336, 19 Mrm.), «t-ra 
pro aiTo 811, 13 (Mfo.); verbi finiti pluralis ad '6nXa referendus est 
555, 9 (Mrra.? - cf. 404, 27 et Kr. § 44, 4 et Kaelker p. 264). — 
399,' 18 autem dfeaetg cum v. H. mutaverim in d,feoe<og. — 

Singularem vero praetulit A. in locutionibus Sim ^Qaxiog et SC 
,)X(yov 376, 10. 495, 21. 889, 22 (cf. 206, 7 ix ^Qay,eog) 881, 10 (qui- 
bus locis Mfo.) et i. dUn^ 417, 11 (Schrs. contra v. H.) et in vocabulo 
noXxg 756, 21 (Mfo.), 959, 22. 963, 17. 270, 10 (cf. 178, 16. 35t>, 3. 
693, 12) 1035, 7. Pro twv ytyvo/ievwv legimus tov ytyvonevov 199, 11 

"(cf. Stich p 151). . 

Saepius denique nominum pronominumque singulans extat pro 
plurali: 618, 14 (iiecd iovto pro iieTd TavTa) 598, 18 {v6(iov iaritn- 
ata,.v pro vofimv iarinaeaiv) 686, 8 (,ie»(eaav vov acQaThv pro (i. Tovg 
acQacovg) 710, 10 (necd tovco pro fietd Tatna) 736, 11 (o xat ijfietg 
iv^vfiovftevot p.o « X. n. iv») 800, 3 (S htaihev pro d ?,».) 737, 10 
(ini S^ Tovcu, pro in). Se cotJTotg) 972, 12 (Tva iir, yv»,a»e(r, nQog eveQov 
pro t. ti. y.^n. iTeQ,ov) 575, 11 (ix noXe(iov % xacexovceg pro ex 
noXenmv /J. x.) 996, 18 (d,g inl SoQtaXdToj pro «c inl SoQtah^Totg) 
458, 13 (noXefi(.ov a,fdX,j,avog pro noXetc(a,v <ry.) 532, 12 (inatQofievoi 
- {.n,) Tov xiQSovg pro in. - ino Tmv xeQSwv), quos locos a M. m dubi- 
tationem vocatos pro Appiani inconstantia mutandos esse negavenm; ac- 
cedunt loci 1067, 2 et 30, 22, ubi Nfo.; retinuerim etiam 623, 3 (,fQovQav 
xaTd fieQog intacriaac pro ,fQovQdg x. [i. i., Mfo.), ubi singularis ex- 
plicetur attractione quadam, cum x«r« fieQog significet s.ngulas partes. 



1) cf. de signif. verb. 






\ -l "• 



y\\ 



— 6 - 

Figura xata avveatv saepissime utitur A. (cf. K. II p. 47—52): 
Primum ita, ut verbi finiti numerus pluralis referatur ad singularem 
substantivi coUectivi: 65, 6 (r« (xh 4 ^ov atQaiov dvdhaxev, tva tiqo- 
^vfjLSzeQov avt^ avvadixotev) 67, 5 (ij arQarid — avQatriyov dnpdei^av 
a^xov) 290, 15 ixi axQaxid - yi^ya TJXdXa^av) 377, 5 (si cod. V. sequi- 
mur cum M.) 410, 23 (ij povXij xolg eyv(oaf.iFvofg aweu^evio, Schwfc. 
avveTi^ero). 685, 17. 686, 14. 709, 27. 651, 16 {to davv - idg nvhtg 
dve^lav, Cfv., Mfo,) 826, 14. 827, 6. 830, 26, 831, 14. 841, 18. 848,23. 
907, 9. 927, 4. 962, 21. 989, 18. 1050, 20. 1097, 11 {xal 6 acQavog 
b Tov KaCaaQog, elte E^entvriSeg, ota nQodtddaxoviai nolkdxtg, elxe etc, 
Mf. post nolKdxig ol axQaxiwxat vel tale quid intercidisse suspicatur). Ex- 

cipiendus est locus 587, 20 (^ Povlri sxfkevae — Aistov xe jQovaov 

enetae, Mfc. metaav^i). Nonnumquam eodem loco structura variatur: 633, 7 
(il^ovXii — iiexentnxe - xal eneiinov). 279, 8 (oUyov 6' oaov eampQovet 
vdg nvlag dnMete xal — snlriQOVv) 206, 24 (^ — sc. axQaxid - <5' 
ovx vnijxovev vn oQyrjg wv enenov^eaav, Schwfc. ot S' ovx vnijxovov, 
cf. 1097, 11) 839, 16. 840, 19. 842, 4. 861, 14. 864, 23. 1070, 17. 

Quo accedunt loci quibus aut praeter verbi finiti pluralem aut sine 
verbi finiti plurali etiam participia plurali numero coniunguntur cum sub- 
stantivo coUectivo: 221, 4 (o Sfjfiog — nenotrjfisvot — StTJQnaaav) 239, 16 
(x6 nXrjd^og — ixXoytCcfievot — rjnetd^ovv) 296, 5 (6 axQaxog — xaxa- 
^sovxeg evcp^fJtovv) 302, 3 (oQdv — dXXo xe nXij^og avxotg avvovxag 
dyoQalov, ot etc.) 324, 12 (dvi^Qet xi]v ^ovXip - a5g — 7iQoS6vtag) 

747, 6 (axQaxov, ovxio - neQtipo^ov cog M^Vf axijvat, neQt xdg 

nvXag ovxag r^Sri, fi7Jxe eaeX^etv) 776, 9 (exsQa — sc. axdatg — S' en 
avTov dvtaxaxo tov axQaxov, tog ovxe — Xa^ovxeg ovxe — ^QaSvvovxeg, 
Mrs. contra Mu. et Schw. coUato loco 732, 17 axQaxtd — xace^orjaev 
wg — ^QaSvvovxeg xat - ov Xa^ovxeg) 804, 10 (rij fiovXfj ^aQQovvxeg — 
avyyeveai odat) 1067, 2. 1113, 14. 1161, 17. 852, 23. 884, 21. 

Talibus quoque locis habemus variationem structurae, cf. 170, 27 
(ovSe t6 Xotn6v r^v ht T(p"Avvi^a ntaxov, vnonxevofievov xe vn sxeivov 
xal vnonxevovxeg avxov) 890, 15 (xi^v axQaxtdv, tva — xaxoxvp Ste- 

xXriQoaaev — , ov axaaidaavxag) 888, 9, 10 (rj ^ovXi^ elxev iv 

oQyfi, dvai>efievot Se - ixfrr^ifiaavxo) 764, 17-19. 469, 12—15 (t6 

fisya daxv at Gijfiat, — — — eXofxevot xd Mt&QtSdreta, — 

fieTeTt^eTo, Schw. Mfm., cf. 877, 1—3 ro Ss nXsov, oQwvreg — ixtO^eTo 

Schw. Mfm.). 

Pronominis pluralem ad substantivi collectivi singularem refert A. 356, 3 
{aTQaTov, ovg) 695, 13 (y^oVw S' avTwv ot noXXot post Ti^v ^ovXrjv) 



— 7 — 

842, 13 (Std acpac post ^ povXi^) 478, 9 (avTovg post aTQarov, Nfm.), 
singularem 488, 17 («i'ri}v spectans ad arQaxtdv quod antecedit; in «^roi^, 
nisi de noXsfiov dicitur, Schwro.), adiectivi pluralem 887, 17 (i} fiovXri 
Toie fisv dyxHiaXot — neQtfjXd^ov). ^ ^ 

§xdxeQog cum verbi plurali coniunctum legimus 835, 14 [r^axriv sxa- 
xeQog) 207, 9^ 797, 4. 228, 16, cum pronominis plurali 539, 25 (t6v fisv 
axQaxov alxi^v omXt^ev §xdxeQog, Nfo.), cum participii singulari et verbi 
finiti plurali 972, 24 (x(OQi^v Sk ixdxeQog — axa&fievoat), cum pai'ticipii 
singulari 686, 9 [ixdxeQog-notovfievog) 1009, 11 cet., cum verbi et prono- 
minis plurali 973,2 (neQtvevovceg-sSol^av dXXr^Xovg ixdreQog axQax6v 
inl aipag iiptnefLip^svxa elvat. Schw.Mfo.^), sxaaxog Ul. 8 cum verbi- 

plurali. , , 

Enumeratione quadam nititur pluralis verbi finiti 637, 13 (xat r^ 

xecpuXii xat vovSe xat 'Avxiovtov — xat xwv dXXwv - nQoVTS^rjaav) 
685 16. 803, 15. 844,22 (ubi enumeratur non per xat sed per i]% 
participii 1050, 23 (ot yaQ Ttg avtiZv Bqovtov ij Kdaatov ovSi ^aao^- 
fisvovg dnsXtnev; hic quoque, pluralem respiciens, xal pro ^ exspectaveris). 
849, 20 (ubi verbum singulari positum est nuroero! dyysXXexat Kdaat6g 
xe xat BQOVxog diprjQrifXSVot), substantivi 191, 22 (St dvSQiov xat yvvatxiov 
dQtaviov, Mrs. contra Wesselingium). Singularem exhibent loci 742, 22 

(^aQQetl ixsXevov ot deQdnovveg vhv xvpeQV^vrjv t6v fisv Sij noTafi6v 

b xv8eQvijcrig elQeaCa ^ta^6fxevog snXet; «g S' int Tag ixfioXdg dipCxevo, 
Mfo. in dipCxevo); item in locis 750,9. 967,8. 394,20. 648,6 (ubi 
dna^etg exspectaveris) 161, 8. 960, 17. 748, U. 139, 25 pro Appiani m- 
constantia offendendum esse mihi non videtur. 1027, 3, 4 pluralem recte 
restituerunt Schw. et M. 



3) De casibus. 



a) De accusativo: 

In accusativo usurpando propria fere non exhibet A., nisi quod saepius 
legimus figuram etymologicam et accusativum absolutum. Accuratius 
tamen ut et haec et alia quaedam proferam inducor nonnuUos locos defen- 

dendi occasione. 

Figuram igitur etymologicam exhibent loci, quos quidem conquisi- 
verim, 29, ex quibus referam locos: 91, 18 (dQ^dwiov v^v avvoxQdvoQa 
dQxnv. cf. 375, 14 Tfig dQxfjg rrjg ififjg «(•?a)) 196, 26 (tqCvov n6Xefiov xai 

1) cf. de sign. verb. 

2) cf. de particulis. 



f 



i\ 



\ 



— 8 — 

TelsvTaTov dkk^Xovg snokFprjaccv cf. 1050,8 Schw. Mfm. i) 771, 19 
(fAovrjv cLQin^ aqtavzoq Mfo.) 926, 16 (r^v Bar^ytiaiv, rjv sariyrjaaTo, Mfd. 
8axyrjaaio) 992, 13 (r^Sixovinrjv, — to iih uQtotov dSixr^f^ia, Mfd. dSixrjfia). 
1089, 6, 7 (ro fih Srj zeXog — sg tovvo eveXevia), qui locus quamquam 
talem accusativum non praebet, tamen quodammodo huc pertinet.^) 

Accusativum continentiae praeterea legimus locis 1 8 ; f. offenderunt 
Mendelssohnium loci 403,16 (xafiiqlovg dl^vvdvag smxa^rjfievoi) et 1017,2 
(satfOQdg TiQoyeyQafifi^vat, si Bekkerum sequimur; cf. 961, 8). Eundem 
accusativum neutris pronominum et adiectivorum expressum legimus 392, 18. 
(snizeTQafifisvoi xovto) 846, 23 {daxeia&ai xd noUfiia) 850, 8. 990, 21. 

1180, 2. 

Accusativus relationis ab adiectivis dependet locis 202, 17 (ih 
awfia xa>l(u) 143, 14 dxQog(^v oQyrjv) 253, 24. 27, 27. 46, 11. 347, 15. 
555, 9. 291, 22. 666, 5. 554, 22. 889, 18. 1034, 22, a verbis 38, 13 
{idg xecfakdg dnexonrjaav) 50, 15. 669, 7. 685, 12 {ntQ(6axecai rov tirjQov, 
Mfc. sg vov firjQov) 37,28 (ubi codicis Peiresciani scriptura dkyrjaawa 
S" avcov Tovg dif^alfxovg mihi videtur esse recipienda, cf. M.^) 585, 19. 

1016, 4. 

Absolute denique positum legi accusativum 43 locis, inter quos 

Mfo.256, 15 (fiVQidSag dvSQWV avviovaag pro fiVQidS(ov dvSQMV avvwvadiv) 
669, 2 (rcov sx^Qcov aizov dvelovca ^ovlevvdg fisv svevrjxovca) 888, 21 
((og Tov ^AvcoIjVcov SQyq) Sid ccovSe eivai noXsfiiov siprjfftafxsvov; v. 19 
ehac pro eiSsvai censeo esse scribendum cum B.. cf. 272, 13. 708, 19. 
889, 9. 736, 17. 891, 5. 898, 11. 899, 22. 972, 6. 983, 12; non repugnant 
891, 10. 897, 10) 1112, 11 (dog alccov cfi yvvaixl ^avdcov yevofievov); 
Schwfo. 343, 10 («V 6 IleQaevg ala^ofievog ovxsci cd locnd c(tiv xQrjfidciav 
snefine — SC. arr^: — (og rfiri xal Sl avcov 'Poifiauug nenohfKofisvov) 
1115,8 {xal 6 fisv coSe s^elnev ov nQog ndvcoov inafvovfxevov; equidem 
accusativo snaivovfievov inducor, ut hunc locum traxisse iudicem Appi- 
anum e Latino quodam scriptore, qui scripserit „Hoc aperuit, [id] quod non 
omnes laudant", cf 1153, 3 et Kaelker p. 280, adn. 2, et Stich. p. 146)^ 
Nfo. 468, 6 (sg "AQcacmva — eiQTifisva, aicov atciov Trjg sx^oXfjg cat 
I6y(p ysvofievov), Stfm. 1078, 19 {smacaXsv Ss av&ig dvakafi§dveiv 
aiTOv). Loco 789, 11 legimus SfinlaxsvTa tov noSa, tov TaQaov tov 
noSbg scefie pro sfinlaxivcog tov noSbg tov t. svefie aut SfinlaxsvTa 
%bv noSa ig tIv TaQabv STSfxe^ 819, 10 ad wc ov Sixaiiog (fvkaaaofxeva 

1) cf. de stract. verb. 

2) cf. de pleonasmo. 

3) cf. de coUocatione verbomm. 



y 



— 9 — 

supplendum est r« nenQayfxsva, 923, 18 tov ^QCafx^ov ad ol Ss cfjg sg 
rbv ^Qiafi^ov vnSQOlptag, ovx dStxov bvca. Loco 1010, 21 Ta^V /*a^'<^«;« 
KataaQi Tovg nlsovag sacQaTevfxsvovg Cfv. .praesertim eos qui sub Caio 
Caesare olim militaverant. " 1022, 8 denique (o5c dxQetov sact cb zyiQelv) 
pro eWSchwrc. sct. Jam restant loci 249, 19. 610, 20. 623, 11, 16, 17. 
169, 5. 645, 5. 626, 21. 299, 21. 663, 15. 695, 5. 708, 11. 799, 10. 
842, 15. 278, 25. 874, 12. 882, 17. 917, 6. 998, 13. 1028, 8. 1075, 25. 
1116,22. 1116,22. 1117,19. 1121,19. 1126,9. 1129,23. 1139,13,14. 
1145, 16. 843, 7. 



3^) De geiietivo. 



\i 



Genetivi usus Appianeus patet latissime, imprimis partitivi et obiectivi. 
Ac partitivum quidem nonnumquam ita usurpat, ut et contineat 
nomen proprium et dependeat a nomine proprio, quod maxime cadit in 
locum 97, 9, de quo accuratius dicam, quippe qui sit instar omnium maxi- 
meque vexatus ab hominibus doctis, quorum nemo in verbis traditis avc(ov 
2eyrjSat(ov acquievit. Sed alii alia conicientes nullam tamen addiderunt 
suspicionem aut explicationem , nisi quod Schw. adnotavit ,ab Arevacis 
ducem fuisse creatum ex toto conexu apparet^ Qua in re cum eo con- 
sentio. Conexus enim sententiarum est hic: ^Aruaci ad tantam comitatem 
sunt progressi, ut Segedaeos profugos non solum reciperent, sed etiam suum 
ducem ex iis crearent." 

Desideraverunt autem homines docti, ni fallor, pronomen ctvd vel 
participium cvca post leyrjSatMV vel vocabulum s^ ante avr(ov (quod 
inseruit ipse Stephanus, cum scripsit vel potius scribi maluit sx rwv 2.) 
vel tale quid, quo accuratius significaretur ratio partitiva, quae intercederet 
inter KaQov et avccov 2€yriSai'(ov. Quam rationom, etiamsi 153, 26. 915, 10 
aliislocis A inseruerit cig, traditis verbis optirne exprimi intellegemus, ubi 
comparaverimuslocos 176, 13. 348, 23. 349, 5. 351, 1. 414, 6. 351, 2o. 353,3. 
Quo accedunt loci, quibus genetivus partitivus dependeat a nomine 
proprio, nomen proprium ipse non sit: 46, 5 {ot TtyvQtot S' avT(ov) 229, 13 
(ubi riaav idem est atque ^stabant'' cum 442, 4 genetivus etiamsi cum M. 
ovcco in oTov mutemus non dependeat a TJQovatag, sed ab r]r) 254, 19 
{t(ov natS(ov ndbaar^v) 364, 2. 477, 15. 547, 19. 681. 12 (ubi M. f. inter- 
punctionis signum ponit ante 2ndQcaxog. — Eiusdem paginae v. 16 
quidni A. struxerit ^sav sntSetxvvvat, qui 256, 16 scripserit ^sav tSetv? 
cf. 699, 10. 944, 27. 799, 9; idem vero recurrit 802, 20) 887, 21 {c(ov 
SrjfxdQxcov 2dUtog Mfc. Ttg) 728, 2. 826, 22 {t(X)V dvSQ0(f6v(ov Mxfxog. 
Nfc. elg) 801, 12. 






f I 



l^/ 



\ '1 



I 



\ 



\\\ 



— 10 — 

Jam e partitivis a substantivo dependentibus restant mentione 

digni hi: 

275, 5 i^TiS' vnoxQiveaO^e iXeslv lega xal b(tciag xal dyogag xal 
rdcfovg- «V rdipoi (^ih sarwv dxivrixoi., ct. 1012, 12 dlld zolg vofioig 
xai T^ xoafxoy r^^ noXcveiag, Sv ovdeig vofiog ovte dgiavoxQavixoc 
xvQtog ovve Srjfxovixog ht ^>) 402 16 {^tavri S' atUotg iv fx^aqy. dtekcov dva 
ytUovg xal egaxo^iovg €g S^xa fifQTi, xal vovvtov txdavov fiFQOvg ^aav — 
dvdQBg. Mfo.in vovvojv) 1021, 8 (dvo ds devoi xavanvdweg sg roiv arifxeiwv 
Svo devovg) 1046, 2 (ioaneQ vt fxrjxdvrjfxa twv ^aQVvdvojv dvavQsnovveg). 

Omnino A. valde amat genetivum partitivum; quod respiciens mutan- 

dos esse negaverim, locos 735, 15 (Nfo. in «v ovx dnaatv) 406, 21 (Mfo. 

in ovSevbg ovS' IxeCvotg tnnswv rjiptkov naQOVVogl 479, 13 {xat avQavriyoi 

«vrcSv iiaav fisv xai xavd fxsQog ixdavto, Mfc. avvolg et svsQot, nam 

a^colv dependet ab ixdav^,, cf. Kr.^ I. 33, 1 et Stich p. 154) 169, 14 

iol aiv avvo» Svo voov alxfiaXtov^^v, Mfo.) 607, 18 {sxvetve vov nanCov 

neQC i^axtaxtlCovg. v^v ante tov supplendum ^) 735, 20 (Mufc. , Mfo.. 

tovvuiv enim pro genetivo partitivo dependet ab ixavov, 'P. snt^avdw ab 

ixavov vovcoyv pro genetivo qualitatis vel continentiae) 672, 4 (Mfo. m 

naQSnefxnov teQetg ve dfia ndvveg xai tsQStat, xavd atpag avv(ov ixdveQOi) 

150, 24 (Schw. B. Mfm. na^d volg insxetva KeXvtiv) 410, 3 {dnsxeaOctt 

vfjgEvQwnrjg Urig xat^AaCag vwv tni vdSe xov TavQOV, Mfo.^*) cf. Stich 

p. 153) 1146, 22 (Mfo. in IvfxavelaOaC vtva vwv KataaQog) 807, 25 (Mf. 

interpunctionis signum ponit post Svvri^svvoiv; rwv ante iroVe ne deside- 

raveris^) 847,11 (Ssog avvbv snelxe xai dyvota. eXvexotvbv ejri r^c 

povJifig To SQyov elve xai v(ov SQyaaafxsvmv tSiov xai el SCxrjv i]Sri votg 

nleCoat SeSwxotev. ij xat vovSe ehv, rj xat vb nkfiOog avvotg avn^Sotvo. 

Bfc. ij xai Swaoiev, Mufc. ij ini vovSe eJev, Schwfc. ij xai vovSe iv Sset 

ehv, Mfs., equidem verba ij xai tovSe ehv post awjfiSotvo collocavenm). 

Prosubiecto positum legimus genetivum partitivum 421,4, pro obiecto 

524, 1 (Mfo.). ^ , , c . 

In genetivo possessivo Mfo. 1058, 25 {dwtkrjxpofxevog sx vtvv vno 
KakrjvoZ vov ^AvvwvCov xavd vi]v 'Ivahav vnoXeketfXfXSVUtv, cf. Kr.^ I 33, 1 
et Stich p. 154) in genetivo causae Schw.^ fo. 696, 11. {sfXfx,a&ov iavv^) 
tfiaSe vfjc x«>^oc pro Std vfiaSe v. x-, cf. cum alios locos tum 29, 4 
kvadfxevot Sri vov xQraCov\ in genetivo explicativo 356, 3 {vsXog snefxipe 
avQavov noUov) Hoesch. N. Mfo., Schwrv. .validam armatorum manum^ 



1) cf. de articulo. 

2) cf. de genere. 



r 



y 



* 



— 11 — 

cf. 532,8. 1016,22 (Schwrv. „mentem reipublicae, amantem" yv^afxrjv 
SrjfxoxQaTtxfjg StavoCag) 429, 5. 829, 12. 254, 15 645, 6 (Mfo. in nQca 
xrjfia vfjgnaiQCSog), Comparando denique inter se servandi sunt loci 1072, 24 
{vove yaQ Sij yvvatxog vt na&ovaa Mufc. yvvatxetov vt, Schwrv. ^muliebri 
quodam adfectu commota", cf. 1109, 5) et 648, 2 xaC fxot Soxel voSe ov 
avQavrjyov naS^etv b 2xtnCo}v, Mrs. contra Musgravium. 

Sed frequentissimus idemque, ut videtur, adhuc minime observatus 
est genetivus obiectivus, quo ita luculente usus est A., ut, si uniuscuius- 
que loci structuram solveremus, praeter meriim accusativum et dativiim 
omnes fere praepositiones, quae quidem cum substantivis coniungi soleant, 
nobis essent ponendae; quas homines docti revera haud paucis locis falso 
non solum desideraverunt sed etiam restituerunt; loci autem sunt hi: 

157, 16 fxdxrjg sva xatQov. 197, 12 KaQxrjSovtwv sxO^et. 267, 8 
fxvaog nQsa^eow Schwfm. in fx. xavd nQsa^eo)v, Mrs. collatis Kr. § 47, 7, 3 
et loco 148, 1, ubi avQavriybg^l^riQ^av legimus pro avQ. xav ^I^i^qo)v, qua 
Stephani coniectura repudiata Mrs. verba tradita coUato Kr. § 47, 7, 3 et 
loco Appianeo 311,9 {imveCxtafxa vov hfxsvog) Nifd. 'l^TqQOiv. Eodem 
pertinet locus 887, 2 {ig intveCxtafxa Tfjg navQCSog). 

Locum 683, 27 {v^g t(ov nolefxCwv Tjvvrjg) Mrs. collato loco 259, 1, 
ubi vq) Maaaavdaaov nTaCafxavt rs contra Musgravii coniecturam r&l ix 
M. nvaCafxavt. 

470, 4 t^v vrjg dxaSrjfXsCac, Rfc. vkrjv ix t. dx. 322, 3. «g to 'Pffl- 
fxaCow avfX(psQov. 870, 11 aov t(ov avfXifSQOvTo^v svexa. 567, 23 xwxwv 
dvTCSoatg, Schwfo. 

854, 12 Tfjc ^ovlfig atScog. 635, 18 atS(6g ts &e(ov. 624, 7. ovSevbg 
BTi ig riS(a Tolg ^ia^ofisvotg SfxnoSoh bvvog ij vofiwv ij nohveCag ij tkxtqC- 
Sog, Schwfv. „et nihil porro, non pudor, non fas, non reipublicae patriaeve 
amor, homines violentos cohiberet afacinore"; vertendum potius est ,cum 
nihil eos impediret, quod pertineret ad pudorem legum, reipublicae, patriae"; 
post svt supplendum est tcov.^) 

433, 6 Trjv vfxSTSQav tov f.islh)Vvog dfXSQtfxvCav. 

287, 22 (po^ov ifxneaovfxsvow. (Obiectivum genetivum non habemus 

449, 22 ubi yeCvovog adiectivum esse apparet e locis 249, 22. 358, 22. 

375, 9. 957, 25. 1175, 13, substantivam est 942, 20. 853, 1. 242, 7 cet.) 

545,3 fxsya Stxatoavvrjc xai nCavewg x/.sog , Mfc. fisya Stx. nsQt 

xat n. xk. 

339, 3 Tovg iTSQ(x)V (pevyovvag, Bfc. ivsQw^ev, Mfc. naQ ivsQOiv; 



1) cf. de articulo et de coU. verb. et Kr.i t I. 33, 1. 



\'^ 



\ 



\) . 



4 



1 



,1 



)^\ 



— 12 — 

if€vyovvitg enim substantivum est, a quo dependet genetivus obiectivus 

ivsQcov. , 

871, 1 €tW« r^g efifjg awtr^Qiag, Mfc. ^r^^ovo^^a, cf. 839, 18 eg 
evvotav emcov fievs^aXev (sg c acc. legimus 645, 3. 883, 15, dativum 

1082, 16). 

864, 6 r^ argaTia — xal o oixeaxog aXkog o^idog avTTJg, Mfo. cf. 
670, 14 xal 6 allog avvov avaaicovrjg Xewg; cUXog, ut saepius, non ver- 
tendum est.i) Ceterum ad delendum athfjg non valent loci 919, 14. 

930, 21. 943, 23. — 

893, 21 vu fievaavdvva avvov Svo VFkrj, Mfc. dn' atvov; quam- 

quam eum defendere videntur loci 901, 6, 21. 896, 23. 905, 24. 909,25. 
920,10; sed cf. 339,3 173,24 (vovg qoivcowag avvmv = v. (f naQ 
athcov). 940, 1 (vd avfi^atvovva vov nokffiov, Nfo.). 

897, 13 fiyefioviag eO^vciv. 868, 15 vcov de hif.idQX<^v vtvig^ dno- 
aavovvog eg vijv avvov x^fQovoviav — avvenqaaae, Mu. Mfm. avvov m 
(Ulov. Schwrs., avvov enim legitur = pro eo, in locum euis. 

929, 19 vd jiolhfiia (ioyfxava^Avvoviov ve xal Aeni^ov = vd n. ^. 
xav "Avv. X. Aei., B. Schwfm., Mrs. 

935, 22 ^diag ex^Qcov i] ifdc^v l-j^Qa, cf. 197, 12. 966, 7 tcfevye vijg 
n6Jiecog, Cobfc. f x ^). 969, 25 dvd^Qenvog avvov 'Peaviwvog. 970, 12 «c 
dvdQotfovov oSomoQov (Nfd.). 285, 16 axd(pag (fQvydviov, Schw. f. desi- 
deravit ifinifinXdweg, cf. 975, 6 vavv xQrifidvoyv (Schwfc. y^fiovaav, Mfo.) 
994, 20 vo i(jyov i^v laxvog xal dtvdfxecjg 1007, 3 vrjeg - vavvix(oveg(ov 
dvSQ(ov (Mfc. ev6vvwv) 1026, 25 vdg nriy(\g ylvxeiag ve xal SaipUovg 
idavoc i^vQiaxev (cf. 547, 22). — 

Inter se comparandi suntetiam loci 1017, 12 eg rorc^ vfn^v noUvag. 
1055, 6 nollvai ve ovveg «//rj/wi- n(j?Jvaig ve ovoiv avvov. — 

1034, 17 To^evfiava nvQog. 83, 8. xivSvvevovvi vfi(5v vm 2xtnC(dvt, 
Stfc. nQoxtvS. vel. xivS. ^neQ, Mrs. 128, 21 clvd^evhv vov noXefiov Stfc. 
ex V. n, Mrs. 410, 14 6aa Koind vrjg avv^xr^g h^t, Nfm. Mfo. 1063, 10 
eQF^tafid vt vrjg oipeoK, Nfc. ex vr^g oipeoK. 1070, 17 avvov rfjg §aQV-^ 
vrjvog (nisi avvov, ut saepissime, idem est atque avvov^) 1075, 11 fiev' 
^'^andvrig ^Awowiov, cf. 1082, 21 r^c s^^andvrig rr]c BaQ^avCov,^ 

1084, 22 SixovoCa vf^g 'AvvcovCov yvc^firjg, Mfc. StxovoCa SC dyvotav 
V. ^A. yv. vel. Six xat dyvoCa v. ^A. yv. 



1) cf. de signif. verb. 

2) cf. de praep. 

3) cf. de pron. 



y 



y 



— 13 — 

1096, 6 avfinenlexvat yaQ otg d^^tov vfidg na^etv xo nQoafjxov 
(Sv efiie dtxat6v eavt notetv, N. Mfo., Mufd. nQoafixov. 

1101, 3 eXnCCiov Se rj (fda) evt ovvt (fidd^etv — sc. arQax(W — 
ij noXefxovwog fxeydlriv laxvv nQoa^xpea&at, Schwrv. „si in amicita per- 
maneret, se ei illas copias conservaturum ; sin bellum agitaret , magno 
robore contra eum se auctum iri." 

1143, 5 x««i[*(wi^o^ sve^v^xeaav Schwfc. vnc x«'|Wft>voc, 1146, 5 «c 
Snl MrivoSc^Qov ^rJQav, Mfo. ceterum versu antecedente M. falso mihi 
videtur scripsisse ex tc5v 6qc5v xad^oQ(6vv(ov xal xaTa^oQ6vv(ov Schw. recte 
8x r«> 6q(ov xaTa&oQ6vT(ov; nam scripturae V. et a ex antecedente 6q(Zv 
lihrarii errore videntur esse ortae. 

Artius inter se cohaerent loci 644, 14 (vCxr^g ^' nav(ole&QCac f.iCaov) 
lAl, 19 (tov nofinriCov tov "Alc^Qa novafxov ev fxea(ji ^efievog) 759, 25 
(ig xh fxeva^v ^aQadlov Te n6lea)g xal 'Evtn8(og noTafxov). — Item loci 
686, 19. (ea Tiov ^vlla xal MaQCov xax(ov dva(feQOVTeg , vHfc. vcov 
int) 945, 7 (xava 2vUav xat MdQtov, (hv 6fioC(og Td yv(OQtfX(OTava roTv 
x«xc5v, Mfo.) 722, 1 (t^v MaQCov xat IvUa xax(ov, Mfc. tiov eni), cf. 
locos 567, 7, 23. 720, 19 (Mfd. xaxwr) 808, 3. 821, 24. — 

749, 11 v()v (f6^ov vfjg yvrjg, Mfc. ix. 588, 3 xavd S6^av ei^xaQnCag 
670, 16 To acfeveQov ddeeg (hv T(p 2tdka avvenenQdxeaav. 555, 17. neQt 
fx6vag fiTTdTO Tdg rolv yvvatxiov ^Sovdg. 996.. 15. eXeo) Tfjg ncXe(og x(a 
nQOfxrj^eCa TQO(f(ov, Mrs. contra Schw. 

780' 15 xaTd d6^av T(ov ent6vT(ov tov re 7vh]^ovg xat aQevr^g 
fxdltava \(ov NofxdS(ov lnne(ov, Mfo. Zippel fc. toC Te n^^ovg t(ov 
int6vT(ov, cf. 787, 15 xaTd S6^av roiv no?.efxC(ov tov Te n^d^ovg xat 

daxrjae(og (Nfo.) .. . ^ ^ , d - 

794 16 TavTric Se axoniov fiyovfxat r^c nQoa^xrjg (^(fOQfxrjv lafietv 
8yveiQri<je(og; Schw. Mfc, sententia inest haec: .quaerenti ((rxo77(«> A. V!) 
mihi videntur ab illo additamento (i. e. a regis nomine) occasionem (non 
.causam«) petiisse aggrediendi operis^ (interficiendi Caesaris). 4 c. acc 
legimus 754, 25, ubi Mfd., v. Hfc (hg nQoa^xr^v Qoniqv) 607, 2 NovxeQiag 
xd ev xvxl(^. 821 , 3 Sta^all6vT(ov i^ifxag eg ahCav dnoQtag etQr^vrig 

da(falovg. 

668, 3 Mfo.; d(f6^(og heQ(ov -= dvev (f6?ov §v8Q(ov = ceteros non 

Extaret denique genetivus obiectivus 875, 9, nisi verba Tfn ^ovXfic 
8 versibus 10. 11 irrepsissent, cf. 880, 8 (ubi rij? Tigoifdcsms non depen- 



1) cf. de articulo. 



f 






Ir. 



\ 



i\i • 



I' 



— 14 — 

det nisi ab sni^mvovrsg, cf. 885, 18) 900, 14. 915, 22! 982, 28. 860, 1. 
Schweighaeuseri certe versio „ut specie aliqua uterer apud senatum** caret 
exemplis. 

Genetivo autem opus non est 411, 26 dg stiI xfjr^aia) (pro xQ^<^^f>^v, 
quod Mfc.) Sr^ avvtMct, cf. 301, 3 tov nXsova (pro nXeovoav, quod Mfc.) 
TTlv oiptv efjLTtoisTv. 

3") De datiYO. 

Dativum A. pro t^no c. gen. couiungit cum verbo passivo 166, 2 (fotg 
Innevat xsKvxXcofxsvot). 571, 13. 1088, 10. 606, 19. 819, 7. 284, 5 (d, 
v. 6.) 907, 2. 96->, 6. 1091, 6 (cf. 1090, 21. 1091, 12. 1093, 5, ubi ha- 
bemus rjTifja^ai vno\ cf. Kaelker p. 279, Stich p. 155. 

Omnino dativus quoque nonnusquam merus extat, ubi Attici ponere 
solent praepositionem (cf. Stich p. 154): 

316, 9 oaa votg fivxolg tmv oixmv sx&xQvnro, Nfc eV, cf. Krebs^ 
p. 75, 7a. 

257, 26 oxXog dvd^QMnoav At^vri (pro sv Affivrj) ^sgovg R. Schwfc. 
409,25 ovx v^Qt^ofxev talg evjiQa^taig, Stfc. fV, idem exhibet Thucyd. 
I. 84, 2, cf. Kr. § 48, 15, 5. 

468, 2 a(ftat nQocfSQovreg, Mfo., atptat = contra cos. 821, 23 ndvO^ 
6 KataaQ ^v anaatVy Schwfc. sv dnaatv. 942, 20 sSeSotxeaav — — 
XU)Qt(ov yetcovag sntd-vfita tmv ^«(^^«^ Mf<> Schwrv. „a vicinis contigua 
praedia adpetentibus", cf. 598, 16 {noXefiog sniy(-yvevat — Tag avdaetg 
iv 'Poyfii] a^taag vno Ssovg sni noXv) et 317, 10 (svO^ovg dnavtag 
snotovv xat dfxeXetg cwv oQUifxsvuiV vno anovSrjg), quo loco Mfd. vno 
anovSfjg. 1036, 8 TipSe pro sv vcpSe, quod Mfc. ; sv TtpSe v. 6, si minus 
^interim" significat, at certe nihil probat. 647, 19 cf^ xacaXi^iffet (pro 
int Tfl X , quod Schwfc.) sxovceg Iv atciatg. 711, 20 v^Qttetv ^QaxBt St- 
aacT^fiaTt XQ^^^^'^ ^^^. int. 342, 18 caiv yeyovovoiv TleQaet, Schwfc. 
ini TleQael. 1091, 22 elnev dnaaiv pro elnev sv dnaaiv, Schwfo. 568, 15 
xacaacriaatto arrff Tovg ^aatXsag, Mfc. sv avTfj, cf. Sch. p. 175. — 1056, 12 
acQacTjyov fisv ovSevog ovcog int naatv waneQ ixetvoig Schwfc. f.xetvot, 
Mf. ixetv(DV^) 393, 13 vtatv ahiatg pro sni c/atv ahiatg, quod Mfc. 905, 15 
dQezfi StaifSQSt, Mfo., cf. 862, 4 aQexxi ^^ ovaav dQiarrjv. 584, 19 fiei^ovt 
xdQtTt Stotaofisvovg Schwfc. inl. — 270, 11 xQV^l^^^^ juera: d^emv avvcp- 
xtafisvTjg, Rfc. /(>. ts d^edov avvtpx, cf. 625, 15. 79, 6. 76, 1. 736, 21. 
768, 15. 1008, 3. — 



1) cf. de genere. 



>- 



> 



o 



I 



— 15 — 

1107, 5 navct Ss (Jdv sct xQsiaacov, Bfc. ndvcwg. 29, 15 xaTa&sad-at 
'P(ofjiaiotg x«V (cf- Thucyd. 1. 33, 1. I. 128, 3. Herod. 6, 41. Hen. Cyr. 
8, 3, 26. Dem. 59, 21.) 401, 2 t6v — noTafiov iv nQofioXfj Totg noXe- 
fiiotg STid^eTo, Mfo. — cf. etiam 1010, 17. 904, 11. 853, 25. 

In dativo commodi Mufo 478, 17 (i^sXtnev avTotg ti< Teixrj, cf. 
198, 17. 236, 7 cet., in ethico 612, 9 (xQoviov S" avT^ — ovarig noXt- 
oQxiag) et 348, 6 Tov Xotfiov a(fiat neQKfSQovTsg (Mfc. iv a(p. n. vel 
a(piat avfineQt(fSQovTeg), cf. 614, 5. 293, 23. 

A substantivis (cf. Kr. § 48, 12) dependet; 537, 20 (fiXovg ri 
noXsfiiovg ^PbHfiaioig (cf. 910, 10) 556, 6 (piXov xai aififiaxov 'Pu)fiaiotg. 
993, 2 (ptXiav Te Pcofiaiotg nQO(fSQOVceg. 1071, 19. sjO^Qav xofvrjv 'Poj- 
fiaiotg. 877, 24 sg dXXoTQiooatv tcov xXrjQOVxt(av KaiaaQt. 1045, 16 ra fisv 
aojfiaTa avTotg vne^e(fSQeTo, quibus in locis Mfo.; praeterea 854, 7 nQog 
avToii aot KaiaaQog (Schw. Mfo.) 854, 1 ig dxQi^saTaTov (fiXov KaiaaQt 
1050, 11 ig avfifxaxiav avTotg snetaav. 242, 7 rwv yaQ yetTovcov fjfitv. 
989, 17 6 Ss Afw^ ifxeyaXo(fQovetTo, tnet ot xat naXatcHv SQytav nQog 
ovx ofxoiovg dvSQag ifxvrjfiovevov, Schwfd. ot vel. a(fiat s. avTotg legebat 
vel ifxvrjfxoveve , Mfo. Cobfc. int ot; equidem tradita verba retinuerim, 
imprimis fretus usu Herodoteo, cf. K. II § 424, 4, c, p. 375 nisi o/, quod 
utique singularis numerus est^), dependet a supplendo yevofxsvcov, cf. 656, 16 2). 

Ab adiectivis adverbiisque dativus dependet 237, 24 {vfxTv ofxoia) 
605,13. 617,1. 915,20. 928,6. 933,13. 882,25. 905,14. 1019,7. 
1091, 17. 1098, 8, quos locos non euumerarem, nisi eandera constructionem 
censerem restituendam esse loco 570, 7 (iuTvxrig ig ndvTa xul (fofisQog 
(av ysvog dgj* saVTOi xal StaSoxrjV Trjv inixQaTovaav Ifxoicag in ixeivq) 
xaTsXtnev, Mufc. in ixeivcov Mfc STt pro ini) deleto in\ quod ortum 
esse videtur e dittographia syllabae ix (eivo)). 922, 25 nihil probat; cete- 
rum cf. etiam 945, 11 et 832, P). 

Dativum, qui vocatur, absolutum legimus: 249, 10 iyo) fxsv yaQ, 
0)^ VfxTv xvQtotg ovat nSQt vcovSe xQTvat, vrjv yvoifxrjv etno%. 

812, 5 Ta i^ dvdyxrjg iipr](ptafxsva aQxovTt rjSrj, Mfc. aQxovvog 
1039, 26 dXXa TsXrj fieTsavQaconsSevov vnSQ nsvve avaSiovg dntovatv 
int Tr^v &dXaaaav, Mfo. Schwr. comma ponit ante dntovatv, qui est da- 
tivus geographicus, cf. Kr. § 48, 5, 2 et locum 4, 13 4 Tr^v "Io)viav xaTa- 
fiaivovTt saTtv ^ fxeydXrj x^QQovrjaog (cf. Stein I. 51, I. 14, 9.) 



1) cf. de numero. 
2; cf. de ellipsi. 
3) cf. do praep. 



— 16 — 



- 17 — 



7 

■1! 



'1 



I 



1 



( 



11 



857, 12 snel xal twv Idioncov noklotg d(j,(fcapriTOVGL aoi xad-' eva 
vfjg ovaiag ovx ddi^QiTOv avrrjv exoov yvwari, St. Mfo. 

897, 18 xivSvvevovat Tolg xoivoTg (fortasse etiam 1088, 4). 

Quem dativum Appiano attribuere non dubito, respiciens usum Thucy- 
dideum (cf. Kr. § 48, 5, 1. K. II. 668); quo accedit fortasse imitatio abla- 
tivi absoluti Latinorum (cf. ad 1115, 8 de accusativo et Stich p. 146). 

Pro genetivo denique dativus extat 795, 20 {xal ydg avTO) xal 
nalg avofXfCero ^^m^ Nfo.). 831, 17. 714, 16 (cf. 706, 17) 911, 19, qui- 
bus in locis Mfo. 

3^) De nomiiiativo. 

Nominativum tractanti mihi non est quod proferam nisi extare non- 
nullis Appiani locis nominativum absolutum: 

29, 12 6g — X(aQov TOVTovg avyx?.€iaavc€g ol 2avvlcai — xal hfHQ) 
nie^ofJLBVcov 'Pcofiaiwv, ol axqair^yol — naqBxdlovv tov JIovuov, 

1028, 6 6&el6vnji)v — jtqosxtqvxscv Tovg noXsfiiovg, avvol [lev 

f;fovr6$ ^Aaiav. 

1028, 8 Toig Ss noXeiiioig ovSev ov daipdeg (ubi, ne accusativum 
absolutum statuam, impedit me nominativus absolutus v. 6). 

478, 9 co fiev l-Qyov ^v tm 2v/./.a dirjvexeg efininTovTt — , bQfxT^ 
8* dnavaTto — xQ^l^^vog, xai nSQi^ewv — xal naQaxnXwv, Schwfo, 

831, 23 vewg aihov KaiaaQog, ^eiwv ctfXbov d^tovf.ievog, Mfc. d^t- 

ovfievov. 

576, 7 xat wv del naqd 'Pcoiiaiotg b xa)/.vu)V SvvaTooTeQog (Zippel 
f. c. xat ovv), quem ad locum M. r. improbata mutatione Duebneriana 
adnotavit, nominativum absolutum posituni esse exemplo Herodoteo (cf. 
Stein III. 16, 13. I. 51. 178), quod cum intellexisset , recte tradita verba 
retinuit 721,7. 776,9 (contra Mu. et Schw., collato loco Herodoteo) 
903, 24. 798, 17, retinere falso dubitavit 142, 20 (e'ao2 — einelv enrjXd^ev, 
eg Tr^v oXiyoTrjca — dcfOQwv Te xat cet., Stfm. in dcfOQoovTt), cum 1088, 4. 
(ubi Schw. ante da^eveaceQav recte interpunctionis signum non posuit) 
nominativum absolutum coniciendo etiam Appiano attribuerit. Non magis 
recte scripturam traditam repudiavit 973, 15 (OvevciStov Se dnelevO^eQog 
evd-vg fxev nQoyQaipevTa xacedrjaev oog naQaScoacov Totg aifayevat, vvxTog 
Se Toig ^eqdnovcag enetae xat eaxevaaev eg bnXicag, xat t6v Seanocriv 
d)g Xoxaylv e^rjyaye' r^Jv t€ dXXr^v^IcaXiav fxexQf^ 2txe/.iag StcoSevaav^ xat 
avyxacelvaav noXXdxtg BTeQOtg Xoxayotg, ^rjvovvTeg OvevriStov, Schwfc. 
^riTovatv, Mufc. wg C^covvceg), ubi quomodo intellegendum sit ^ricovvTeg, 



y- 



y 



apparet e comparatis ceteris locis, praeter imitationem Herodoteam — quam 
persequi meum esse non putavi — ad explicandum hunc usum gravissimis, 
quibus per attractionem quandam ita usurpaverit nominativum absolutum 
(sc. participii), ut is vel praecedens vel postpositus duos homines, factiones, 
populos aut antea posteave comprehensos disiungeret (581, 21. 741,22. 
741, 24. 932, 24. 972, 24) aut antea posteave disiunctos comprehenderet 
(199, 21 Nfm. 233, 23. 988, 26. 1009, 11) aut antea posteave comprehen- 
sorum alterum seiungeret (1076, 12. 1140, 19) aut alteri antea posteave 
seiuncto alterum, ambo comprehendens, adiceret (1004, 10. 973, 15. 62, 27 
— 63, 2, ubi simul extat anticipatio quaedam). 

Servata igitur scriptura C^covvreg locus intellegendus est, quasi 
legamus ^r^Tovvceg OvevciSiov ixdT€Qot, quod deesse non mirum est 
r4 respicientibus verbum avyxaTelvaav, sententiam autem, cum C^TovvTeg 

neque ad solos Ventidianos neque ad solos centuriones referri possit, sola 
ea, quam modo explanavi, ratione sanari nemo non intellegit; cf. K. II 
245-247. 661—664, qui hunc usum non pro constructione absoluta sed 
pro appositione partitiva vel distributiva v^ilt haberi. Sed cf. Kr. § 5<\ 9, 
1—4 et Kr.i I 100, 3. Quoquomodo res se habet, certe extat anacolu- 
thia quaedam, quae mea quidem sententia, praesertim cum maximam partem 
usu veniat loco genetivi absoluti (cf. 988, 8 210, 3), si minus rectissime 
at certe simplicissime et commodissime vocatur nominativus absolutus. 
cf. etiam Stein I 52, 4. Kr. § 57, 10, 11. 45, 2, 2 et 3. — 

y 4) De gradibus comparationis. 

Gradus comparationis A. saepius inter se permutat, quam ut 
librariorum neglegentiae hoc attribuamus; legimus enim superlativum 
pro comparativo: 598, 25 (nQWTog oSe eg to qaveQcoTarov '^Qe&tCe Tovg 
'iTaXtc^vag, Mfo.; loci 374, 4 et 1180, 26 nihil probant; cf. etiam 715, 7. 
726, 16. 993, 19). 

6, 16 xat TOVTWV neQt ~ Srj/coaco Ta dxQt^eacaTa, Mfo.) 923, 9 

(rj oaa TtfitcoTaca dkla, Cfv. preciosiora) 930, 10 (TeXrj Sexa wv TeaaaQa 

fiev cd efxnetQonoXefiw caTa — Stexf^aQco, Cfv. bellicosiores, magis Latine 

certe quam recte) 937, 4 (avcovg enrjXnt^e, neQifieivavcag eg ew cd 

^ dxQt^eaTaTa fiax^etv , Cfv. quoad diligentius cuncta percepisgent , vHfc. 

TdxQt^eaceQa), comparativum pro superlativo 1 3, 23 (efKpvXta, (fo^eQwceQa 

aifiat TavTa fidhaTa yevcfieva, Mfo.) 286, 15 (veog t€ wv eTt xat x^Qa- 

avTeQog eg fidxag , Mfo.). 819, 5 (avv dvacdaet ze xat oQfifj ^aQvceQa, 

Mfo.) 835, 16 ((ftXovetxoTeQot Se toTc e^eqi^ovatv ovceg, Mfm. in (ftht- 

2 



«If 












fi 



— 18 — 

vEixotazoi contra meliorum codicum auctoritatem) 854, 1 (etQrjzai S* 
ofiiog (og sg axQt^BavaTov (pikov KaCaaQi, St. Mfm.) 939, 2 {xa (po^SQco' 
T€Qa "PuyfzaCoig xa^eXovva t€ edrrj xal xTrjadfievov, Di. Mfm.). 992, 16 
(jo Se dviaQOTEQov, Mfo.), positivum pro superlativo 665, 20 {Tovg 
v€(OTdTovg T€ xal €VQ(oaTovg, Mfo.) 672, 13 (Nfm.) 833, 7, 8. 1099, 
26 (ita ut his omnibus locis positivus per xal arte coniunctus sit cum 
superlativo quodam) 668, 15 {avTog Ss tt^v fjLeydkrjv aQxrjv ot>S€v6g 
ivox^ovvTog bkcqv dns^eTo, Mfo.), superlativum pro positivo 366, 15 {xal 
^aav ol fiaxtfKOTaTot jLiVQtcov xat Stax^mv nketovg, Mfc. udxtfxot avTwv), 
positivum pro comparativo 230, 7 {xaQT€Qov m Totg noXefxtoig svsnsaov, 
nisi Schw., apographo nisus, recte coniecit xaQTSQooTeQov STt), compara- 
tivum pro positivo 521, 15 {xal Tond^ovaa noXXd dTon(6T€Qa, Mfc. noUd 
xat aTona) 645, 22 {snt(fo§(»)TBQ(av pro snt(fc§(ov) 1050, 14. 1136, 12. 
Quae permutatio an sit perturbatio necne, dubito; maximam certe 
partem e neglegentia quadam scriptoris mihi videtur esse orta; sed cum 
res sit incerta, satis habeo eam statuisse. 

Eo certiorem autem habemus imitationem Thucydideam 250, 3 
{int(fav&aTaTa S^ t(uv nQo avToi) 856, 13 {dQtarov dvSQoov tcov S(p" 
savTov) 317, 21 {fidhara r&> dXXwv snt(pavsg) 1136, 14 {xetficovt tcov 
n(6noT€ fidXtaia xatvoTQon^rt) , cf. Kr.i I 1, 1 ^noXefwv d^ioXoycoTacov 
T(av nQoyeyevrifisvcov" Kr. § 47, 28, 10. Quo accedunt, qui similem cogi- 
tandi neglegentiam praebeant, loci 45, 9 {fidXtaTa (po^eQc^TaTov). 720, 8. 
911, 7, 8. 817, 19. 210, 24 (Mfo.) 612, 21 (Nfd.). 661, 22. 1188, 17 
(cf. Kr.i VII 42, 5. Kr. § 49, 10, 8. K. II p. 26), ubi superlativus 
augetur vocabulo fidXtaTa, et loci 416, 6 (fiaXXov — nQo^vfioTSQcov) 
725, 5. 856, 17. 860, 3, ubi comparativus augetur vocabulo fiaXXov 
(cf. Kr. § 49, 7, 5. K. II p. 25). 

Tum pro comparativo fiaXXov cum positivo (cf. Kr. § 49, 7, 4) extat 
682, 7 (sTt fiaXXov noXXot aws^sov). 704, 4 (cf. 816, 14), pro super- 
lativo fxdXtaTa cum positivo 711, 23 (ot fidXtaTa sx^qoC) 1136, 14. 
1136, 21 (to t€ axoTog rjvoxXet vvxiog fidXtaTa fieXatvrjc) , qui locus, 
quamquam fidXiata significare potest ^praesertim" (cf. 1172, 23), mihi 
videtur interpretandus esse non „caligo turbabat, praesertim atra nocte% 
sed «caligo tufbabat, cum nox esset aterrima" spectanti et verba to axoTog, 
quae sequentibus verbis augenda sunt, non augentur illa versione, et 
locum 1144, 2 (xat vvxTog r^v ht to Setvbv dToncoT€Qoi). — 

Elativum autem' exhibent loci 195, 18 {n€Qt ovtco ^QaxvTdTov) 
45, 8, 9. 672, 24 {inet (JfavaTog 6 natg 6 tov 2i'XXa veanaTog '^v STt, 
Bfm., ceterum cf. 1180, 22). 



«.^ 



% 



— 19 — 

Formula denique sv ToXg fxdXtaTa (cf. Kr.i I 6, 2. Krebsi p. 75, 7) 
ter legitur: 643, 10 (xQrjatfKOTaTog sv Totg fidXtaTa oSs 6 dvriQ iysvsTo 
T(i) 2vXXa). 658, 11. 887, 10. 

6) De articulo. 

Articuli usum Appianeum, si lex est neglegentia, hac sola lege di- 
cendum est posse circumscribi; quod, etiamsi in tanta multitudine loci 
nonnulli inter se similes recurrunt, apparet tamen primum e coUatis inter 
se eis locis, quibus praeter bonorum scriptorum consuetudinem articulum 
omisit ante ipsa substantiva vel nomina pro substantivis habenda cum 
attributo non coniuncta (cf. Stich p. 161. Sch. p. 174; 175); quales locos 
congessi 84, e quibus 81 Mafo. (cf. Loesch); cf. 104, 26. 238, 2. 296, 2. 
551, 1. 73, 22 cet.; quo accedunt, ubi substantiva sint abstracta (cf. Kr. 
§ 50, 3, 4) loci 12, e quibus 9 Mafo., cf. 409, 6. 411, 16. 

In nominibus gentium propriis valde fluctuat sermo Appianeus; 
habent enim secum articulum 301, 5; 14. 307, 17. 518, 11. 48, 8. 
58, 20. 331, 9. 415, 17. 366, 6. 418, 6 aliis, articulo carent 240 'l9 
254, 11. 289, 19. 239, 25. 297, 6. 350, 17 (Mfo.). 346, 9. 351, 2. 
352, 6. 19, 19. 25, 11. 42, 24. 60, 2, 16. 391, 20 (M. r. omisit) 
447, 13 (Kfo. in Trjg MaxeSovcov ^qx€v) 171, 6 (cf. M.i) 990, 8. 993, 2. 
1142, 5 (Mrs. contra Schw.) aliis. Offendit M. in articulo 618, 18 (6 
Tov IlovTov — ^aatXevg) nescio an non recte pro tanta et universa Ap- 
piani inconstantia et variatione. 

Participium deinde pro attributo coUocatum articulo caret 42 
locis, e quibus 34 Mafo., cf. 25, 24 (Schwfo. in Tr^v yp — su ovaav 
dvsfxrjTov pro Trjv yfjv Trjv ht o{^aav dvsfirjTov) 622, 19 (Tovg ts dXXovg 
noXtTag ix tcov otxicov STt fxayofxsvovg avvsxdXovv, Mfo., cf. Sch.) 381, 3 
{Tr^v aTQaTtdv dno Tfjg"Aatag — xaTtovaav, Mfo., cf. L.) 1094, 10 {eXeog 
Tmv y€C0Qya)v Ta xTTJfxaTa d(fatQovfXSVCov , Nfo. , cf. Loesch, qui f. hanc 
coniecturam attribuit Mendelssohnio). 64, 10 KsXTotg t6t€ fiia^o(poQovatv 
ot — SwQedg vnsaxrjTo, Mfo.; ceterum loco 198, 23 a M. ad commen- 
dandam scripturam K€Xt(ov Tolg adhibito tantum abest, ut quidquam pro- 
bari iudicem, ut mirer, cur M. non ita sibi constiterit, ut loco 64, 10 
At^imv Totg avfxfxaxovat mutaret in Atfivat Tolg avfxfxaxovat, respiciens 
aut eundem locum 198, 23, ubi non legimus At^vcov oaot (velut KeXTcov 
oaoi 49, 9) sedAtfiveg oaot, aut locum 58, 11 — 15, ubi legimus ^^'/?t;e^, 
vnrjxoot fxsv ovTsg oTSe KaQxrjSovtcov. Poterat etiam conicere, quae 
mutatio lenissima videtur, KeXTotg Totg tct€ fxta^o^oQotat; nam inter 



/ i 



i\. 



t 



- 



- 20 ^ 

KeXvtov Totg et KekTolg Totg non plus interest quam inter Ai^voav cooi 
et Ai^veg oaot, cf. etiam 1, 9. 18, 10-14. 38, 10 {volg hi 'Priyivoig 
lomoTgy Mfc. 'Pfjyivcov. 1080, 11 non valet ad mutandum. Appianum 
quoque delectat variatio!) 57, 16. 332, 18. 347, 24. 172, 11. 173, 24. 
355, 23. 375, 20. 399, 14. 405, 1. 410, 5. 416, 9. 479, 16. 424, 5. 

Adiectiva pro attributo posita articulo carent 93, 16 (Mfo. in w- 
xTog Urjg) 105, 14 (Mfo. in oXrjv^I^rj^fiav) 434, 7 (Mfo. in vecoTceTO) naiSi) 
515, 14 (Rfo. in noXkriv paatXeoog 7ia()aaxev7]v) 1^1, 9 (Mfo. in vneq 
navQtov noXtTeiag) 842, 5 (Mfo. in ent oXrjv i^imeQav) 761, 4 {vQtaxiXiovg 
evToXfxoTaTovg ne^oig evijSQevaev, Mfo.), non carent 630, 14 (Tag eTeQag 
noXetg Tag eTt acpcov xaTrjxoovg); itera pronomina carent 187, 22 (Mfo. 
in T^ade neiQag) 1133, 15 (tovto fxev Srj avyxvQriiia, Mfo , cf. Loesch, 
qui confert 686, 9, ubi Nfo. in exdveQog nQo(faatv Tijvde notovfiievog, et 
904 , 12, ubi Schwfo. in otxetov riyoviievot To^e bQyov) 331 , 1 (neQt 
Tcovde (pQOVQcov, Schw. Mfm., cf. Loesch) 424, 2 {nQog eveQOVg MaxeSovag, 
Mfo., cf. Loesch), non carent 964, 6 (vovade Toig — dtaffvyowag) aliis; 
item genetivi carent 448, 11 (ot fiev tov IIcvvov xavaaxeiv, Mufc. t^v 
Tov nSvvov) 496, 24 (6 xatQog eXeyxet ae Tfjg ent^ovX^^g, Mfc. 6 vrjg 
entfi.) 821, 5 (xat vdXXa SriiLioxQavovfievo)V nQa^ofiev, Stfc. va tcov Srj- 
fioxQ.) 503, 1 (avv Svo TeXeat Toig (^tfi^Qiov, Mfc. votg Svo cet.), non 
carent 639, 2 (vd fidwevfxa t6 toov — devo^v). 1136, 17 aliis; item 
praepositiones cum casu suo coniunctae (cf. K. § 462 m., p. 526) 
articulo carent 235 , 5 (o S' enav^et necfQayfievog "I^r^Qat xal KeXvotg 
dno Tov Xotfov, Schwfo. , noli conicere KeXTotg Totg) 568, 4 (avQavov 
neQt vrjv IvaXCav, Mfc. rov ne^i) 67, 20 (dQxrjv e(f eavTov oiaav ent- 
^ovXfjg, Mfc. Tf^g iif' eavTov) 875, 25 (Tovg vndTovg fieT ifie, B. Mfm. 
in Tovg vndvovg vovg f^iev ifie, Schwfc. vovg fiev ifie vndvovg) 679, 18 
(Mfo.). 696, 9 (Mfo.) 847, 12 (Mufo.) 1033, 22 (Mfo.) 640, 5 (vd S' 
evayxog ig Mt^QtSdvrjv, ubi exspectamus vd ig M.) 663, 1 (xat vovSe 
Tov nevd^rjfie.Qov aQxovva IvvFQQrjya ixdXovv' eXrj S'' dv iv voai^Se ^aat- 
Xevg; Mfc. 6 iv ToacpSe /?.; verba elri — ^aatXevg a Schw. vertente 
omissa hoc modo intellegenda sunt ^significaverit autem** — sc. verbum 
interrex — „o iv Toaq^Se ^aaiXevg'^; ceterum nescio an possint esse inter- 
polata) 1065, 1 (Mfo.) 598, 16 (Mfo.). 630, 17. 445, 29 (Mfo.). 1158, 18 
(Mfo.), articulo non carent 577, 18. 6, 4. 253, 18. 838, 10. 846, 2. 
1019, 10. 

Infinitivus caret articulo 274, 13 (eQe&tafia inaveXd^etv ig avTa, 
Stfc. Tov in.) 963, 13 (ig fxrjSev dnoxdfxvowag eXni^etv neQteaead^ac) 
1013, 16 (xai tC fiot xavaXhyetv vd noXXd) 1095, 9 (fia&ovvag — 



t 



^ 



- 21 - 

SvaeXntavov aoo^ead^at firj xavoQd-ovatv). 1119, 16. 1135, 6, quibus 5 
locis Mfo. 

Tum in genetivo quoquo partitivo nonnusquam articulum omrttit 
A., non solum ubi genetivus ille continetur substantivo quodam (670, 18 
exvetve vov Ilaniov neQt e^axtax^^Xiovg, ubi vcov ante tov supplendum^) — 
1016, 7 Xeyevai nove nQog tcov dyQicovdvcov fiaQ^dQcov rj noXtg aXcovat, 
Mfc. T(dv §aQ§dQO)v\ sed etiam ubi constat e praepositione cum casu suo 
coniuncta ita, ut praeter sententiarum conexum ex solo articulo omnino 
apparere possit ratio partitiva; qui loci sunt hi: 73, 25 (ovSev Tt nQoaa- 
^cov ig Tov dSeXcpov, post nQofiad^cov vcov supplendum, non couiciendum! 
Schw. Mfo.) 24, 14 ixXet^f&fjvai vtva — sc. vmv — ig evae^etav, Mfo.) 
446, 18 (ovSevog — sc. tcov — ig dfivvav ine^pQowixet , R. Mfo.) 
569, 24 (Svvavcovdvrj — sc. tcov — fiev ^AX&^avSQov dQxtjy Mfo.) 609, 15 
(noXXovg — sc. vcov — avv avTq. xaTexoipav, Mfo.). 624, 6. (ovSevog 
eTt — SC. vcov — ig atS^ — — efinoScov ovvog, Schwfv. ^) 503, 24 
(xo)fxr^v vnb MtO^QtSdvf] fxeyiavrjv, Mfc. T(av vnb) ^ll^ 28 (dnaTrjXoTavov 
avQavrjybv — sc. tc^v — naQa a(piatv iSoxovv yeveaO-at, Mfo.). 

Porro saepius articulo caret substantivorum duorum per xal 
(vel Te — xat) inter se coniunctorum alterum (cf. Loesch), cf. 637, 
11, 12 (xal rj xe(faXrj xat TovSe xat ^AvTcoviov — xal tcov dXXcov, Mfc. 
^ ^Aw. et xat at Tcov dXXcov) 640, 13 (Trjv Se yvvatxa xat Texva, Mfc. 

vd Texva), quales locos congessi 21, e quibus 18 Mafo.; primum bis: 
855, 12 (fxevd xXtjqov xat vfjg encovvfiiag, Mfc. fxeTa tov xX.) 969, 19 
(ixXvcovTe Seafxcovag xat avvdycov Tovg dnoStSQdaxowag, Mfc. TOvgSeafX.). 

In appositione denique articulus deest 597, 24 (cf. Kr. § 50, 3, 7) 
626, 1 (vnb 2e^TtXiov fjyovfxevov , Mfc. tov rjy.) 472, 27 (cf. Loesch) 
993, 16 (rdtov KaiaaQa, TrjaSe vfjg fxovaQxiag fjyefxova, Mfc. vbv TfjaSe) 
aliis, adest 283, 1 ! (fj noXtg fj KaQxrjSovioov fj vove, Nfo.) 364, 1 (^ldnoSeg 
ot neQav "AXneo)v). 48, 11 (ot nQeafietg ol (^dfitot) 577, 19. 609, 4. 
613, 20. 626, 22 (cfr. Kr. § 57, 10) 964, 16 aliis. 

Pro pronomine (cf. Stich p. 161. Kaelker p. 275) articulus 
legitur 161, 27 (enet vfjg neiQag i^entnvev, Mfc. T^aSe vfjg) 412, 12 
(Tfjg rjfieQag pro Tfjg avvfjg fjfxeQag, Rfo.) 447, 10 (vcov i^vcov pro vcovSe 
Tcov i&vcov, Schwfo.) 665, 12 (Trjv dQx^^v pro TavTrjv Trjv d^xrjv, Mfo.) 
1017, 11 (ig Tovg vfxcov noXivag dno^Xenoweg, Schwfc. vovaSe vovg). 
606, 10 (xat ro fxeQog tov aTQaTOV rai^t) MaQict) nQoaeS^rjxev pro xai 



1) cf. de genet. part. 

2) cf. de gen. obj. 



— 22 - 

To aXXo IX. cet., Mrs.) 771, 10 (ro i^lbqoq exovrsg pro t6 tavTwv fiagog 
sxaOTog bxovTeg) 857, 4 {tov naTQog pro tov gov naToog, Nfo.) 864, 1 
{rriv xecpaXrjv pro Tijv ariv xetp., Nfo.). 

Sed priusquam ad ipsa pronomina tractanda transeam, commemoran- 
dum mihi est, ab A. articulum contra Atticae dictionis usum non 
saepius omitti quam poni, ac ne hac quidem locorum e multitudine 
— quae est 65, e quibus 54 Mafo. — inquirenti evasit mihi lex quaedam 
aut regula, quam eum secutum esse possit statui, nisi quod maximam 
partem deictico illo, quem vocavit Krueger § 50, 2, significatu videtur 
esse usus; cf. 178, 17 (ciiv Ttjg dvvafieaK SQr^fuav) 217, 25 {ovx dvisc 
Ta IsQa Tov efinQrjafAdv vnoSeixvvovTa) 337, 9 (xal athoi TBGaaQsg 
avSQ€g vno t6 Teixiov vnoaTavieg inefiovXevov, Schwfc. vno ti Tetxiov) 
406, 11 (xdfxvovTeg iveSiSoaav, vnc TTJg dnoQiag) 532, 8 (dSo^ovvTeg 
ijSrj t6 twv XrjaT(dv ovofia) 679, 21 (^5 HeQnevvag aiTalg sveyeYQanTo 
eni r^ xXrJQq)) 716, 1 (vno Te e^ovg tcov aTQaTeicov), 816, 12 (tov Se 
TJipaTO fiev ri '^Sovrj) 955, 18 (nQOTJyayev aavT6v enl Trjv acpayriv) 1029, 6 
(xai Ta BQVfivd Tcav evT6g xaTela^e, Mfc. Ttva) 1107, 6 (wv ht xQeia- 
aiav — xaTa t6 nXfjd^og) cet. 

6) De pronominibus 

cf. Kaelker p. 277. Stich p. 162. — 

Primum adnotandum est, pronomina avT6g et avTov confundi 
152 locis, non a librariis, sed ab ipso scriptore (cf. Sch. p. 174 et Loesch) 
ita ut 152 locis falso offenderint aut mutaverint M. alii; cf. 702, 15 
705, 17. 717, 25. 752, 21. 754, 24. 763, 22. 776, 5. 782, 2. 792, 7* 
22, 24. 804, 19 cet. 

Quod cum ita sit, mirum non est, quod dativus ot, qui saepissime 
usu venit, significat et iavTai (velut 75, 16. 148, 12. 162, 8. cet.) et 
adTip (137, 7. 138, 14. 581, 5 cet., cf. K. I § 165, 2 II § 455) o? pro 
^avToil legimus 500, 3, od a^Tov 866, 1, atpetg, acpwv, acpiat pro aihoi etc, 
(cf. Loesch et Stich p. 162) 29, 14. 52, 6. 334, 2. 468, 2. 777, 16. 
834, 18. 999, 23. 1070, 20 cet., pro iavTcov etc. 273, 10. 620,' 22* 
429, 11. 777, 14. 825, 22. 904, 3. 732, 4. 812, 2. 924, 21 cet. 

Pronomen avTog^) pro articulo legimus 677, 2 (noXefiot S' ^xfia^ov 
olTog T€ — xat 6 Mtd^QiSdTov - xat 6 twv krjaTcov - xat neQt KQTJTrjv 
nQ6g avTovg KQ^Tag heQog, Mfo.) 710, 1 (Msfifitog Se dXovg inl Se- 

1) cf. de coU. verb. 



mtm 



23 — 



xaafio), Tov vofiov Tov Ilofinrjiov StSovTog avTq, q^rjvavTt BTeQov dtpetad-ai 
Tfig xacaSixrjg, tov nev&eQov tov U. — nQoexaXeaaTo , Mfo.) 638, 17 
(Mufo.) 777, 18 (Mfo.) 1006, 26 (Mfo.) 1016, 5. 1045, 23 (Nfo.), pro 
ovTog 912, 16 (avvofioaavieg ot^v — f^^XQ^ ^avaTOV Stayoovtetad-at, xal 
ig avTO Bdaaov dvayxdaavTeg , cf. 984, 11) 999, 24 (vnefievov 8(jog 
a^iatv at indX^e/g Stevefiov' wg Se xal aviat xaTeavQr^aav cet. , Mfm. 
in a^Tat). 1040, 14. 1120, 4 (Mfd.) 1158, 18, pro ixetvog 1175, 16 
(6 Tlofiniqtog ifxefnpeTO et noXffUov i^yoiJvTat tov nQsa^etg ig avT6v 
dneavaXxoca xal vd naQ ixeivov neQtfuvovTa, Schw. Mfo. — Candidi 

autem versio saepissime aut prava est aut liberior, cf. 581, 22, 584, 4, 6. 
589, 19. 593, 6. 594, 22. 600, 9. 618, 12. 620, 8. 621, 4. 624, 25. 
627, 19. 633, 21. 637, 16, 19. 638. 9. 641, 10. 642, 13. 347, 22. 
443, 11. 470, 10. 528, 4. 831, 3 794, 14. 911, 8! 1136, 11. 1173, 9. 
978, 23. 697, 2. 694, 21. 1055, 26, cf. H. B. p. 22, Sch. p. 172, Loesch, 
H. B. ^ p. 92), avTa pro TavTa 1028, 16 (cbv ot fiev dfi(pt t6v Bqovtov 
ivD^vfU)Vfievot fidXtava StFTQt^ov. 6 Ss ^AvToovtog avcd SeStcog syvco, Mfo., 
cf. 131, 3, ubi Mfo.), saepissime denique idem significat atque ipse, adeo, 
etiam, velut 1120, 3 (xal Tolg nQoyeyQafifievotg avTotg neQt tovtcov 
ineaceXXoj') 1164, 17 (dXXd xal TTJg dQecfig t6v KaiaaQa iSavfialov 
xat Tijv aQyiav avv^Seaav AeniSco, xat vrjg aQnayfjg avT6v inefiefKpovTo 
avTTjgy ig t6 taov cotg i^aarjfievotg xacaacdvceg, Mu. Schwfo.). 1180, 9 cet. 
ovTog pro avTog extat 1080, 25 (TavT etnev 6 KalaaQ. xal tov- 
Tcov ot fiiv — i^sTQexov, Mfo.), pro ( avTog 621, 6 (6 S' elnev, iXev- 
^eQ^oacov avcriv dn6 tcov TVQavvoilvTcov. Kat tovto Stg xat TQtg iTSQotg 
xal tTFQotg nQsa^eaiv iXS^ovatv etncov ini^yyeXXev oficog, Mfo.) 594, 21 
(Mfo.). 216, 13 (Mfm.) 1055, 26 (Mfo., Cfv.) 743, 18 (Mfo.) 825, 2 
(Schwfo.). — ixetvog pro avTog legimus 920, 13 (a^pcov ixeivcov, vHfd.) 
1042, 9 (vHfd.) 1062, 20, porro 570, 7 aliis, imprimis autem usu venit 
xdxetvog pro „et ipse" vel „et is quidem"; quales sunt loci 273, 12 
(ov nQtv dnsacTjaav crjg nXeove^iag , nQtv — d^paiQe&fjvat xat — naQa- 
Sovvat — xal (pQovQav ivSs^aa&at xat Ta Teixrj — xad^eXetv xal axsS6v 
rjnetQcocat Toce xdxetvot yevsaO-at) 1018, 16 (svrjv — Tovg acQaTovg 
ndvTag dnoSovvat T?j noXet, xdxeivrjv sXsaS-ai Ta avvoiaavTo) 1072, 17. 
1105, 11. 444, 11. 544, 26. 599, 7. 915, 21 (ix(popcov avTovg fifj — 
xad-^ sva Tcov KaiaaQog sxaaTog ofiota 'AvTcovi(p nd^ot, xdxeivo) — TdSe 
na&cvct, Nfd.) 910, 14. 940, 12, quibus locis respectis assentiri non 
dubito Schenklio, qui 178, 4 (tcov Ss aTQaTrjycov "'Anntog fisv Kanvr^ 
naQSfieve, xdxetvog fiyovfievog sXetv Kantrjv) xdxetvog, quod intellegendum 
esset j,xal ovTog" „et is quidem", voluit servari, repudiatis medelis cum 



•^m 'I • ii'« mn i I I a i »i«> 



— 24 — 

Mendelssohnii , qui (M.i p. 131 adn.) xav iiovng vel x«V etg scribendum 
esse proposuit tum van Herwerdeni, qui coniecit i^isya xe.jSog ^yorffevog (!). 
Simili ratione atque xdxsTvog saepius usu venit xal ode (610, 16. 
143, 2. 875, 6 cet.). og pro oaog legimus 137, 1 (smyQaxpag txdatotg 
ovg bSec neimecv, Mfo.), oaog pro og 67, 13 (zdg ScoQedg — , oaag fie- 
ydXag — enencfAcfeaav, Mfo.) 1177, 13 (Nfo.), cavra pro TotavTa 142, 12 
(ola fiev xal oaa 'PoifiaTovg eSgaGav , oTag Se avv^TJxag — l&evco, 
ovSeai TaTca avvd-eaO^ai "Po)fiaT(ov vnoacdvcwv, Nfo.) 847, 12 {ol (fTlot 
— vnecTd^evco TavTa, wace ot fxev — i^^Tovv, Mfo.), cotoaSe pro co- 
aoaSe ti02, 14 (rjx^eco ToicovSe xa) ToadSe eiQyaafieviav dvSQMV dd^Qcixig 
d(faiQovfievog, Zeissfc. ToaoovSe) 170, 21 (Bfo.) 430, 22 (Mfo.) 669,24. 
687, 7 (Mfo., sed cf. 443, 3), oSe pro coacaSe 31, 4 (neQt Se Tfjg dcpe- 
oeoig ovS' avcu fiev fnot Soxel, 'PoifmToiv noXXd xat Setvd SeSQaxoTOiv 
i]fidg — , TovaSe covg elXr^fifievovg dnokvetv navcog dnaO^etg, Mfo.) 
735, 18 (xat cdSe fiev f^v avT(o cd ne^(c), oaog pro otog 1160, 8 (^elri 
cd fiev ix firjxavfjg Ta c5' dno ^«^('«v, oaa iTd^ot xat nVQ^poQa xai co^ev- 
fiaTa, Mufo.), TOfdSe pro cdSe 1081, 16 (xai i]v tu xe(fdXata cov noXeiiov 
TotdSe, Mfo.), quo loco referendum est ad insequentia (velut oJf 219, 17. 
107, 3, 18), cum oSe ab Appiano saepissime referatur ad antecedentia 
(cf. Kr. 8 51, 7, 3. K. p. 556, 7), qua observatione neglecta Mafo. 599, 4 
(eariyovfievog Se ttjv yvoifxr^v xat entfiTvoiv avTjj xaQceQcog, vno Ttjg 
fiovXfjg enC Ttva acQaceCav e^enefKpO^rj Std TcSe , Zippel fd.) 825, 17 
(6 S' ev T<i ^Qy(i) fiovov eactv enTfiefinTov, taacine^a rifietg, StaUaxcfJQtov 
vfiTv df,ia eg Tovg ofioeO^vetc eWjfievov, xat rjStaTov rjSrj nv^ofievotg. 
otg Tfjv c/fifjv cr]aSe cf^g yi]g toig «(fjjQrifjievotg fjfietg ex toov SrjfioaTwv 
XQrjfidcwv — dnoSo)aof.iev , Nfd. cfiath; equidem, ut i]fietg v. 18 cum 
Musgr. deleverim, ita (ug v. 17 mutaverira in oY) 583, 5 (lov f^iev FQdxxov 
vofiov ovx expeye Std tov Sf^fiov aa^polg, Tfjv Se TovSe SvaxeQetav ene^t(ov 
ti^Tov cet., vHfm. covSe in covQyov) item in cotcaSe Ni. Mfo. 560, 22 
(etnovco Se avc(f) fiecd co aQfia ot ava cQaTevad fievot cet cet. c fiev Sf^ ^qT- 
afiSog ^v TotcaSe.); cf. 173, 1. 179, 16. 198, 15. 199, 19. 251, 20. 294, 13; 
16, 17. 8, 16. 293, 22. 475, 19. 616, 16. 620, 14. 434, 5. 825, 11 
(criv Te yfjv TjjvSe avcr]v eaaet ^e^atovfiev xat ^e^atooaofiev, xat fidQTVQa 
Tov ^eov TovSe notovfied^a, Mrm. covSe in T(f)vSe cum C). 

Quo accedunt loei, quibus oSe si minus superflue at certe ad pre- 
mendum articulum vel pro Latino ille videatur esse positum: 136, 14 
(dvexdket Tfj adlntyyt covg evSov, xat nQtv avcq. yevea&at x^^^ovg, Totg 
Innevatv evoxlovfievotg ene^orj^et. TovSe Se cov acQaTov tov nUovog 
ex Tfjg xoofirig ^'xSQafKwcog, ecQeipaco fiev eg (fvyrjv Tovg noXefxTovg, ov 



f 



— 25 — 

fxriv iSTwxe qevyovcag, MuSchwfm.) 449, 3 (tov S' avvov xQOVov Mtd^Qdag 
xat Baycoag ^AQto^ccQ^dvrj TovSe tov vno '^PcofiaToov xaTrjyfievov — exfia- 
Xovceg, ^AQtaQa&rjv xacriyayov, Mufo.) 654, 24 (Mrs. contra Mu.) 200, 5. 
854, 10 (Nfd.) 924, 25 (Nfd.). Usitatam autem significationem (cf. K. 
p. 552, 1) exhibet 210, 10 ((peQe ovv, ^fietg fiev — tcofiev, Maaaavdaarjv 
Se TovSe entcd^u^fiev) 669, 24. 216, I. 249, 16 aliis locis. ovg fiev — 
ovg Se pro toi'c fiev — Tovg Se semel inveni, 251, 13. 

Possessivum pro personali extat 433, 7 (Totg efiotg (ftlcdtotg, 
Krm.? cf. 795, 5 toov S' avToji KaTaaQt (ftkTdccov) 871, 6 (coTg efiolg 
int^ovXotg, Mfo.). 

Interrogativa denique pronomina in participio exclamativo 
(cf. Kr. § 51, 16, 5) legimus 241, 23 {ot noaa xat nr^Uxa SeSvvrjfxevoi 
SQdaat) 264, 15 (vfietg Se — tT TcovSe tcov avvd-r^x^jav ahtcofievot nuQa- 
^e^dad-at tov noXefiov eiprj^fTaaa^e;). 

Haec habui, quae proferrem de pronominibus , in quibus utendis et 
inter se confundendis A. mihi videretur ostendere neglegentiam ^) quandam 
(cf. Kaelker p. 268 sq.), qua in universum observata singulorum lo- 
corum memoriam ab hominum doctorum offensionibus defendere non dubi- 
tabam, etiamsi me defecerant loci gemelli. 

7) De temporibus. 

De temporibus aut permulta mihi dicenda sunt aut perpauca; nam 
pro Appianei usus proprietate — id quod cadit etiam in pronomina et in 
praepositiones — inqiiisitione egent accuratissima , qualis cum abhorreat 
a generali huius libelli proposito, neglecta singulorum locorum ratione 
in universum dicam perpauca. 

Summa igitur congerenti et inquirenti mihi evasit haec: 
Primum libentissime uti solet A., ubi aoristum exspectamus, 
imperfecto verborum (pevyetv, aTQaToneSevetv , aTQacevetv, xekevetv, 
^dXXetv, aQxetv, yTyvead^at^ ejetVj dyetv, Ti&evat, Xeyetv, nefineiv, yQd(fetVy 
dvatQetv , verborum in — vetv, — d^etv, — T^etv, — co^etv) — axetv, 
— TnTetv, — ovv desinentium, verborum liquidorum aliorum; quales locos 
congessi 168, e quibus 98 Mafo. 

Deinde plusquamperfectum exspectamus, legimus imper- 
fectum 42 locis, e quibus 33 Mafo.; cf. 122, 15. 94, 25. 141, 8 
(cf. Sch.) 567, 23 (Schrs.) 819, 19 (Bfm.) 916, 19 (Schwrv. Jecerat 



ij cf. de grad. coinp. 



— 26 — 

irrite); plusquamperfectuni contra loco imperfecti extat 900, 13 (o 
KalaaQ exaaza itia^wv rjnoQrjio , Mrs.) 74, 14 (oi^devog de XafXTiQov — 
YSvo^svov, vd At^VMV vneQrjv^rjTo , xal icaaav axsSov li^rjQi^av tlyov, 
R.Mfm.). 444, 8 (Mfo.) 879, 20. 965, 12 (M.Bfm.) 104r>, 8 (Mfo.), 
loco aoristi 74, 7. 5^7, 23. 290, 4 (roVe iidhata insxuvio toIq 
noXiOQxovfisvoig xal nQcg avcovc hsvavxeaav, Mfc. ivBvevaav) 298, 16. 
320,2. 722,2. 908,3. 1173, 4. 

Praesens pro imperfecto legimus e. c. 112, 3 (xai, fjLoi doxsl 
cbv OvQidr^ov noXefiov — avvayayelv); quales locos inveni 9, e quibus 
8 Mfo.; imperfectum pro praesenti extat 1026, 20 {e^6xet ye lii^v a^ 
dvdyxTjg o "Avrwvtog (aSe nQa^at, Mfo.) 1120, 20 (avv&^r^aav ml voiaSe, 
XeXva^at fiev zov noXefiov — xai rdg efinoQiag dxcoXvzovg ehat nav- 
Taxov — aQxetv Se laQSovg — xat oacov dXXwv etx^v eg Tore vjjawv, 
Mfc. exet) 996, 13 (M.Nfo.). 752, 9 (Mfo.). 

Aoristum pro imperfecto legi 22 locis, quibus Mfo. (cf. 611, 15. 
226, 11. 193, 8. 146, 7. 316, 19), praesens pro aoristo semel 177, 23 
{avv XQ0V(p S' eniavQOVTeg rj Stagj^eiQOVTeg, rj sg Trjv ^AXfiavcSv avyxQiatv, 
""AXfirjaeag avTovg xaXovatv) , coniunctivum praesentis pro coniunc- 
tivo aoristi 90, 22 («V eg Ai^vrjv aTQaTevji, Mfo.), optativum aoristi 
pro optativo praesentis 8, 10 (el Ttg ofiov Ta 'A&rjvaiMv xal Aaxe- 
Saifiovmv avvaydyot, Mfo.), item indicativum 1188, 20 (Mfo.). 

Imperfectum pro futuro extat 358, 18 (Mfo.?), perfectum pro 
plusquamperfecto 322, 21 (Mfm.?), aoristus pro perfecto 265, 20 
(Mfo.?), praesens pro plusquamperfecto 805, 13 (Mfo.?), futurum 
pro praesenti 799, 20 (Mfo.?) 1078, 4 (Mfo.?), praesens pro futuro 
248, 8 (Nfo.? -— 1166, 10 Mufo.), praesens pro imperativo 264, 3 
(xoQog eaitv aTvxrifidTwv, Mfo.) 991, 12 (Mfo., cf. 950, 20, ubi Mfo.?). 

Quam locorum multitudinem quicumque spectaverit, concedet is 
mihi, ni fallor, ad refutandas editorum offensiones haud fere iam opus esse 
singulorum locorum defensione aut singularum commutationum explicatione, 
qualem dare magis minusve artificiose conati sunt Berg et Loesch; mihi 
quidem, ut tam accuratam inquisitionem meam esse iudicem, una tamen 
— praeter paucos librariorum errores — videtur dari explicatio, quae est 
Appiani neglegentia, varietas, inconstantia („A. ist in der Darstellung der 
Zeitverhaltnisse im Allgemeinen etwas lassig** Loesch. — «Consequenz darf 
man von Appian nicht erwarten" Sch. p. 172), quales virtutes unaquaque 
fere pagina et in toto dicendi genere apud eum deprehendimus. 

Neque tamen multa quae accuratius et per se tractentur digna esse 



n 



: — 27 -^ 

negaverim (campus enim hic patet latissimus), praesertim si quis Bergii 
exemplum (H. B. ^) secutus viam inierit comparativam. 

Mihi autem ut in animo estservandam potissimum curare Appiani 
elocutionem (qua in re, ni fallor, certissima ratio est enumeratio), satis 
habeo, quae illuc pertinerent, enumerasse. 

Quod valet etiam in infinitivo et participio iam a me tractandis. 

8) De infinitivo. 

Infinitivum tractanti hoc potissimum mihi est commemorandum, 
Appianum verba sperandi, exspectandi, minandi, iurandi, promittendi 
nonnusquam coniungere cum infinitivo praesentis vel aoristi, cf. 208, 14 
r<B xTeivetv Maaaavdaarjv vntaxvovfievq), Mfc. xTevelv. 498, 22 rjnetkei 
xTeCvetv, Mfm. 363, 11 vnoaxofievot Se^aad^at, Mfm. Schrs. 1168, 3 ol 
S^ ovx eipaaav av&tg avQavevea&at^ Schw. Mfm.; quales locos congessi 39, 
e quibus 29 Mafo. ; servandam enim censeo esse scripturam traditam, quam- 
quam 70 fere numeravi locos contrarios. 

Item fielleiv saepissime coniunctum extat cum infinitivo faturi, 
cum aoristi ter (583, 22. 850, 22. 1122, 24, quibus locis Mfo.), cum 
praesentis decies, cf. 163, 5.. 139, 3 cet. (novies Mafo, 168, 10 Schrs.). 
In infinitivo praesentis pro infinitivo aoristi posito septies Mafo , futuri pro 
aoristi quater, praesentis pro futuri bis. 

Infinitivus pro imperativo legitur 184, 1, 2 av S' vnofievetv fiot 
SevQo.xatTdevSovhntzriQelv) 854, 11. 866, 8, 11. i) 1179, 11 (cf. 289,22 
Mfo.? 946, 5. 600, 2). Tnfinitivus finalis octies caret particula (ag (terMafo), 
cf. 177, 25 SQOfKt) Sied^eoVy tov xtvSvvov fieraaxetv. 764, 16 rac axr^vdg 
— StTJQna^ov eg t^v (pvy^v o Tt SvvatVTO endyead^ai, Mfc. tnetyofievot. 

Nonnusquam deest etiam articulus, quem saepissime A. imponit 
infinitivo, cf. Stich p. 161 infra. — tov cum infinitivo legimus vi negativa 
(cf. 608, 22. 805, 15 Mufo.) saepissime, rarius vi positiva, cf. 301,3 
Tov nleova Trjv oiptv ifinotetv Tolg nolefitotg. 

Nominativum et infinitivum exhibent 34, 24 (ol Se levovwv, 
oaot rjaav iv TvQQrjvta, nv&ofievot dvrjQfjaO-at, TvQQrjvovg r^yov int'P(ofirjgy 
Mafo.2)) alii, genetivum et infinitivum 31, 10, 11 (Ti-g ovv dveteTaC fiov 
TovaSe firj xreiveiv), dativum et infinitivum 52, 25 enotovvro S' ot 
'^Poofiatot '^evovg, otg iSiSoaav fiev elvat (ptXotg Mrs. Schwfm.^) 

1) cf. de anacol. 

2) cf. de verb. sign. 

3) cf. de attractione. 



sft w. j t n ..% J 



••«<«> 



} 



— 28 — 

Infinitiviis activi denique pro passivi extat 832, 7 (oc tiqotsqov 
ovSe nBQiovTac avvovq eipEQOv xalelv ^aadtag) 858, 24. 244, 1. 240, 8, 
quibus locis Mfo. 

9) De participio. 

Saepissime participium praesentis legimus pro aoristi, imprimis 
verbum ylyvead^ai, nvvd^dvea&aL, dia&dvead^at,, Tvyxdvea^>ai., O^vetv, dvvetv, 
xQvnvecv, yiyvMaxefv, aw^tcv, y^uDQelv, dtfixvelaO-at, xQaietv, dyetv, dxfid 
^etv, quales locos congessi 79, e quibus 05 Mafo. Contrarium exhibent 20 
loci, quibus Mafo, cf. IIO; 20 6 ds OvQtav&og — O^afitvd emu.v xal ov 
Ttva xatQov dSoxrjvov exXtnwv — i^vcox^et. 

Participium praesentis pro futuri legitur 36 locis (cf. H. B.), e 
quibus 20 Mafo , cf. 131, 1 rjv tTc vecoreQog Tfjg vevofxta^evrig cotg vnatev- 
ovatv T^Xixrag. 

Participium praesentis pro perfecti inveni 12 locis, e quibus 9 
Mafo. , cf. 584, 3 (r&r 2xtnt(ovt yafiovfievi] pro c 2. yeyafirj[j.Fvirj Mfo.) 
371, 6 (xat ereQa ed^vyj d^ptatdfieva m nQo avtov, Schwfo., Pletho fm., 
cf. M. 1. p. XXI), 1089, 9 rr}i' acQavtdv, carj colg ytyvofi&votg ecpTJdQeve, 
Cfv. «exercitum omnem qui gestis rebus interfuerat", cf. ea, quae supra dixi 
de Candidi versione, quam nihil probare iudicant etiam Loesch, Berg, 
Schenkl. — 

Haec habui, quae proferrem de participii teraporum commutatione. 

Jam restant pauca de usu: utitur enim A. participio pro enuntiato 
non solum ad significandam causam adfectuum — 573, 20. 574, 12 225, 26. 
623, 9. 721, 15. 864, 24. 1158, 22. 226, 12, quo loco verba olg JiJ xal 
fidhava, £f)g nXeov Sedtoatv, eO^dQQet Schrs. contra vH. qui fc. nleova 
etdoatv. — cf. 817, 17 vnoacrjaead-at dipatQovfievovg — aut rationes 
irrealem (874, 11 ovce dtpetkovco dv — firj — dvvtXa^ovceg, 1061,8 cet), 
temporalem alias — quae non sunt nova, sed etiam in verbis dicendi 
et sentiendi, et in eis ita, ut modum usitatum longe transeat: nam pro 
ipso infinitivo aut accusativo et infinitivo eum ponere participium nerao 
negabit, quicumque inspexerit locos 225, 27 (ewQa Se lag — xaxonad-^am') 
262, 9 (vnoonvevov ovx enl avvOrjxi] fie^ata r« ofnrjQa naQfxovveg) 376, 10 
(crjg nQea^stag avvtevceg dcptyfitvrjg) 847, 5. 849, 20. 1061, 8. 1107, 20. 
1118, 6. 1138, 18, ac non solum post verba sentiendi et dicendi hoc usu 
venire docent loci 374, 11 etpaaxov elvat SvaeQtv ce xal (ptkonokefiov xal 
ovnove eiQrjvevetv Svvdfxevov. 511, 27 efielXov. . . Mt&QtSdvrjv . . . dno- 
xXetaetv — ... ovve e^odovg ... evt e^ovva ovve fitd^ea&at Svvdfievov 



V- 



V 



V 



~ 29 — 

evt AevxoXXov vno vrjg Svax(OQtag, rjg xQavcSv xavetpQovrjaeVj Mufc. xQavetv. 
886, 10 nXdaaevat yQafXfiava — SC. wg^) — cf^g ^ovX^^g xaXovarjg avvov. 
649, 4 rifielet dyetQcov, ubi tamen ellipsin potius statuerim vocabuli ovSev 
post rjyetQet. 1066, 9 xavakeyovct — xat errtvefiovvt SvaeQyeg ^v. 1061, 8. 
1131, 1. 1147, 7 (Mfo.) Saepius etiam praepositionem cum substantivo 
abstracto aut cum articulo et infinitivo coniunctam exspectamus, legi- 
mus praepositionem cum participio, quod nescio an depromptum sit 
e sermone Latino: 

846, 7 fiecd 2vQtav Sod-etaav = post datam Syriam. 

573, 21 Std vovg StatQovvvag = Std vrjv StatQeatv, Mfo. 

1116, 7 eg entxvrjvov dQXYjv — eg enixcrjatv aQxfjgj Mfo. 

622, 18 ent votg neQtoSevovat — ob viarum transitus, Schwfo. 

308, 20 vno fidO-ovg ve xat nvevfidvoav dyQtcoveQMV sc. 6vv(ov, Nfc. 
dyQtovrjvog. 

Accedunt loci 900, 20, 1062, 19. 1115, 16. 584, 10. 

(og semper fere coniunctum legitur cum participio futuri, neque 
tamen hoc nonnusquam npn caret particula (og (233, 9 tnefine — AaChov 
e^ayyelovvva. 259, 4. 354, 6, cet.); ideni cadit in locum 863, 4 (rdtov — 
v6 Soyfia (peQovva vcp avQacco Stenefineco, Mfo.), ul)i participium prae- 
sentis extat pro futuro. 

Extant porro loci, ubi duo participia sine ulla coniunctione^) 
inter se sequantur, ita ut alterum ab altero dependeat: 100, 2 NeQyo^Qtyeg 
— nvxhofievot , nefixpavceg rJQ(6v(ov. 752, 4, 5 ot Se xat xdfivovveg oXoog 
T^ noktfKi) vijv xQtatv vaxvveQav fiaXkov rj nQtnovaav enetycfievot yevea- 
■d-at, ndvveg e^cocQVVOV avvov cet. 

Conatum denique significat participium praesentis loco 617, 17: 
inel StaXv(ov avvovg ovx enetS-ev. • 



1) cf. de ellipsi. 

2) cf. de asyndetb. 



r 



10) De asyndeto. 

Asyndeta haud crebra sunt neque tamen rariora quam ut coniecturis 
mutandique studio non abstinuerint homines docti. 

Extat igitur haec figura inter substantiva 856, 17 (7r«Vr« Xa^iTiQa 

T(ov KctiGaQog {■'x^eg, ysvog, ovo^a, dh'(Ofia, neQiovGiav), inter adiectiva 
vel inter adiectiva et participia^) 268, 8 {^ ^sv noXtg eadv avonXog, sQr^^og, 
ov vavv, ov xaianatriv, od ^slog, ov ^t^tpog sxovaa) 527, 2 (xal nkovvog 
diriQnd^ezo noXvg , ota noXecog veoxaraaxevov , (fdovipwg avvcpxiafx^vrig, 
Nfo.) 687, 19 {c Ss KaiaaQ ^v hi vsog, Seivog einetv re xat nQa^ae, Mfo.) 
793, 7 Sia^S(ov Tcre yv^v6gd'/.rihnfisvog, cf. M.) 806, 21 {^olo^slXag, vsog 
dvriQ xat neQi(6vvfxog, vnaveveiv — ^Qrjfisvog Mfo.) 895, 22 (dvonXovg, 
davvrdxrovg, sg fwvag — StaXXaydg avveX&ovvag), inter participia^) 100, 2 
(Schwfo. 4)) 442, \^{elfxa — dfxnexofxevog — xat vnoSrjfxaza sx(ov IvaXtxd, 
riji; xe(faXriv IhQni^^vog xaintXov entxetfxevog, Nfo.) 544, 25 (nXrjaidaavvog 
ds Tov nofinrjtov xoiV(oa(Xfxevog ^Qadrri , avyx^^QovvTog Tt xdxetvov xat — 
fxv(ofuvov, xan(fvyev, E. Mufm. rt in Te) 964, 19 {o^ev ovd^ etQTJvrjg vave- 
Qov yevofxsvrjg xaXovfievog snaveX^etv r^^icoaev, Mfo.) 830, 15 (alxf^aX^^iovg 
— yevofxsvovg, dvvt xoXdae(ov sn dQxdg — nQoax^evvag, Schwfo ) 465, 10 
(Mrs. contraSchw.) 1060, 14 (Mfo.) 1174, 17 (Stfo.), inter verba totave 
enuntiata ') 247, 4, 6 (oiHot Zaxav^atovg .... 'sxTStvav ovSiv dStxovvcag. 

otTOt NovxSQtav Xa^ovTeg cet.) 786, 1 1 {snsSwxe Ss xat ^sag ixaTS- 

Q(o^ev. dvsavrjae xat Ty yeveieiQa tov ve(ov, Mfo.) 30, 1 1 (dXXd . . . Siayoo- 
viovvrat aot neQt TfjaSe Tfjg xf^QtTog. sxetg svsjvqov, Nfc. otTi;). 

41, 6 {xQrjfiard ts aviov Xa^elv IvTev&ev ijSrj naQexdXet, nQo^paatv 
(og S(6aovra TOtg t^v etQTJvrjv BQyaaafisvotg. intyeXdaag 6 0a^Qixtog . . . 

1) cf. Kr. § 59, 1, l 3. K. § 546. Stich p. 208. 

2) cf. Kr. § 57, 2, 4. 

3; cf. Kr. § 56, 15, 1. K. § 492. 
-*) cf. de particip. 
5) cf. Kr. § 59, 1, 5. 



>- 



r 



< 



X 



— 31 — 

8(frj, Schwfm.) 278, 6 (xal dno TovSe ^v otaTQog dXoyog . . ., otov . . . g)aac 
Tag fxatvdSag dXXoxoTa xatvovQyetv. ot fxsv tcov ^ovXevToov . . . fjXt^ovTOy 
Bfm.) 293,23 (Schw. Mu. Mfo.) i) 450, 14 (Nfo.) 875, 25 (Schwfo.j 
247, 4, 6. 889, 23-890, 9! 890, 13. 950, 7, 13. 1033, 24. 1037, 22 
(Gelen St. Mfm.), cf. etiam 818, 16 (Mfo.). — De locis 1029, 22 et 1131,21 
agam, cum tractabo particulam xat.^) 

11) De anapliora. 

Anaphoram, partim coniunctam cum asyndeto,^) exhibent loci 242, 10 
(od) 247, 4, 6 (oi^Tot) 261, 18 (oiJ) 268, 8 (ov) 269, 7 {ov) 338, 7, 8 (ot'). 

670, 17, 18 {xoQov Te xat xoqov xat xoqov) 825, 13 (ov) 1013, 18 

(ov), 21 (ov); qui tamen quidquam novi non magis praebent quam ei, 
quibus anaphora continetur particulis fxsv et Ss: 

259, 15, 16 {xazrjyoQovv fisv — xaTTjy^Qovv Ss) 319, 17, 18 (sna^e) 
823, 15 (snrjyaye) 1063, 8, 9 (Xeyofxevog) 1096, 3 (d(patQfi) 990, 10 
{S(oaovat), cf. 1017, 12, 14. fxsv deest 667,3 (nQov^rj .. ..nQovfirj Ss) 
493, 26 (naQaSol—.. . . dnoS^ Ss) 977, 6 (l-Sicoxe) 750, 22—24 (6 fisv 
Srj ToTaSe nQoaS^Sfievog aiSot fxdXtaua rcov s^fcov s^vcov sg atcdv dqo ■ 
Q(ovv(ov, xat (fstSot AevxCov Ixtnicovog, Mfc. fxsv pro fxdXtaca) 845, 6, 7 
(aiTetv), 



12) De figura . 



«r« avveatv. 



Quod supra numerum tractans egi de figura xazd avveatv, iam agam 
de eius figurae genere, quod minus arte cohaereat cum numero. 

Ac primum quidem A. saepissime structura aut coUocatione com- 
mutat terras, urbes, oppida cum incolis: ^) 

247, 4 ovvot Zaxavd^atovg, noXtv 'iprjQiag snt(pavfj, a(fCat xe avTOtg 
svanovSov xal (fCXrjv rifitv, rjfirjSov sxzetvav. 

156, 15 noXtoQxetv S' ovSsva ela, naQa^pvXdaacov xat ^entxeifxevog 
(Schwfc. ovSefxCav noXtv, Mfo. cf. 653, 1 vdv dvTtavQavrjyovvra . . . sno- 
XtcQxovv. 1111, 6 noXtOQxovvva S' evt vov^Iovtov, Mfc. noQd^ovvva. 891, 1 
noXtoQxovat avQavov vfxsveQov. 83, 24 noXtoQxetv avvovg sSet. 83, 26. 
84, 1. 979, 23. 984, 16. 1006, 6. 913, 7 1143, 14. 299,25 snoXwQxet 
vd fxea6yeta, Mfc. ini^Qd^et-, 395, 2. 562, 18. 360, 14). 

1) cf. de praep. 

2) cf. de coniunctionibus. 
3] cf. Kr. § 59, 1, 3. 

4) cf. Kaelker § 265. 






— 32 — 



5, 8 avcrj v€ "Izalta fxaxQOTatri Sij ndvvuiv id-vcov o^aa, M^rs. 
collatis locis 1005, 13 {vriv "I^r^Qiav, evQVTdcrjv e&vwv odaav) 1020,4 
(Maxsdoviag, bO^vovg oQ€tov), quibus addo 618, 18 6 tov novTOv xat dUcov 
id^vwv ^aaiXevg) 639, 11 "Aafav xai dUa ed^vrj jtoUd 687, 17 Hovtov 
fiaaUea, xaC riyv aQxriv aihov, xal caa dUa eOvrj jiQoaeXa^ev. 773, 3 xal 
xalovatv athd — sc. vd eO^vrj — evi ovoi^iaTt 'Aatav Trjv xdTco. 756, 23 
Utaidat xat nacfkayoveg xat KthxCa xat 2vQCa xat 0otvixrj xai i6 "E^QaCcav 
yfvog cet. 833, 7 Trjv^EXXdSa—, SvaaQXTozaTov t^vog xai (ftkelevd^SQov^) 
988, 1 2vQCav T€ xai noXXd twv eyyvg ed^wv. 1062, 7 r^v "iTOVQaCav 
xai oaa dXXa yevrj Ivqojv (cf. 1123, 18) 500, 1 AvxCovg xai^PoSCovg xai 
MayvrjaCav xaC itvag dlXovg, Mfc. MdyvrjTag. 561, 4 toj Se aihtf) noXefiiqy 
xai KtXtxCag Td fiTJnm acpCat xacTqxoa xai 2vQCag Trjv t€ 0otvCxrjV xai xoCXr^v 
xat UaXataTCvrjv xai zijv eg t6 fxeaoyetov eni noTafi6v EvifQdrriv, oi"Sev 

eit Toi Mt^QtSdTi] nQoaijxovTa nQoaeXa^ov, Mfc. TdSe pro ht, post 

nQoaTqxovTa supplendum est ed^nri. — 1064, 5 eneiiine zovg Inneag Tldl- 

fivQa noXtv StaQndaat, fitxQd {nev entxaXtZv avTOtg. 1064, 17 xai 

Soxet t6S€ t6 eQyov "AvtcovCo) t6v fieT ov noXv HaQOtx^v noXefxov e^dipat, 
noXXtov ex IvQCag TVQdvvcov ag avTovg avficfvyovTcov, ubi athovg in- 
tellegendum est ndQd^ovgl - bS\,21 '^ Se noXtg . . . . StTJQrjTo eg Xvnrjv 
xai rjSovjjv, oT fiev otxTetQOvveg cet. 

1099, 8 TTiv Se UeQvaCav avTrjv eyvcoxet fiev 6 KataaQ eg StaQnayi]v 
entcQexpat to) acQaToi, KeaTtog Se Ttg aihcov... evenQrjae, M. ad athcov 
r. adnotavit „noli daccov conicere.** — 351, 19 — 20 ol' St dnexQCvavTo 
KcQxvoav fiev xai (DdQov xai "laaav xai ^EnCSafivov xai "iXXvQtcov Tovg 
Actvcavovg ijSrj '^PcofiaCcov VTcrjxoovg etvat. — 

1182, 10 xaC fxot eSo^e ra ^XXvQtxd, ovt€ dxQt^cog yevofievd fiot 
yvwQtfia, ovT€ avvTeXovvTa fifjxog tSCag avyyQacffjg, oihe ^ciQav e^ovTa 
tTeQcoOt Xex^vat, tov xQovov xa^" ov eX^^^farjaav avvdyovTog aihd eg 
TsXog nQoavayQdipat, xai vno^etvat atnd Trj ofioQw MaxeSovtxrj. Ad 
sXrj(fOrjaav non ra "iXXvQtxd supplendum, quod supplet Schw. vertens „quo 
primum susceptae sunt" sed ol 'iXXvQtot, cf. 359, 16. Genetivus tov xq6- 
vov dependet a n q o avayQdxpat, Sententia inest haec: „visum mihi est, 
iam ante describendam (Octaviani) aetatem, qua capti suut, Illyricorum' 
res usque ad finem conscribenti enarrare.'* 

562,6 ot ndvTa dfitxTa xai dnXooTa Tatg noXeatv eg dXXrjXovg 
inoCovv, Stfc. dXXrjXag, Mrs. 

469, 13 at Gfi^at... iXcfievotl 
^^^ ^ ^^ ^oXtg, dnayyeX&eCarjg cfjg avfKpoQcig, oT fiev . . . eO^Qijvovv. 

') cf. de grad. comp. 



> 



\ 



I 



— 33 - 

^ Restat locus 997, 13, 14 ineTaTcev Zfiwg xai zotg dXXoig ^veat 
cfiQ "Aatag (fOQOvg ecolp SCxa avfKfeQetv. xai oT fiev enQdaaovTo . . ., 
qiiem locum hand pLine gemellum brevitatis causa huc adicio, nam voca- 
bulo elhvog apud Appianuiii saepissime ipsam terram significari ut Mendels- 
sohnio (M^) concedam, tantum abest, ut figura iUa, quam statui, xtxTu 
avveatv rem facillime et simplicissime censeam expediri. 

Qua figura quam vario modo A usus sit, haec denique doceant exempla '): 

672, 5 at dQxai.... intxeCfievot, d. 664, 4, ubi Mfm. 267, 23 cog 
e'c (xv'}qo)71ov dxovovaav post naTQCSa. 

149, Jo oSonotolv rj = ()S()vjiotcov 7] Mu. Schw. Mfo., ceterum cf. 33r;, 24. 

710, 1 (haano)fievog — (itaancofievov tov nXrj^ovg avTov^). 

599, 6 yevea^at post SrjfiaQxetv = Sr^fiaQxog yevea^ai. 

971, 5 ev XdQvaxt dgdn6 atS^Qov eg xQyifidcoov rj ^t^XCcov exovai 
q)vXaxrjv. 

94»;, 15 dTQ€fX€tv (ag exovat = aTQefia fietvat cog exovat. 

1012, 12 Totg v^^fiotg xai t(o x()afi(,) Trjg noXtTeCag, (Sv ovSeig vtjfiog 
xvu/og }ht ^v, Mfo , cf. etiam 275, 5.^) 

1013, 24 (^fiaQxqtg, rjv Ttva uQxrjv. 

663, 14 Tr]v dQxfjv, ovg exdXovv, cf. 567, 9. 

1050,23 ovTtg ath(ov dneXtnev, ot dnoXtnovTsg — mlli dneXt 

nov ot dnoX/novTeg, Mrs. contra Schw., cf. 776, 7—9. 732, 17.^) — 
1016, 8 ovS€v6g dneT€fiov xe^aXdg, Mfo., cf. 1050, 23. 
1168, 4 T(Zv nQOT{QO)v post acQacevaea&at = tcov nQOTeQwv acQa- 

TStCOV. ^) 

1069, 5 d^vfioTeQO)v Se eg t(x eaofieva ovtoov, Mu. Schw. Mfo., 
vHfc. eaofieva dv ovtcov t(ov acQactwTcov, equidem twv aTQaT/wTcov verbis 
non expressum solo ex intellectu suppleverim. 

334, 2 naQd a(fCa/v post r^ fxev ^ovXij = naQa 'PwfiaCotg. 

1062, 16 xai ev K/l/.xC(x nQog avT6v eX^ovarjg KXe/mdcQag efiefi- 
ipaco fiev (og ov fiecaaxovar^g tcov eni KaCaccQt n6vo)v, Tfjg Se ovx dno- 
Xoyovfievrjg fiaXXov fj xacaXoyt^ofxevrig avTOtg OTt xai Td naQa ol TeaaaQa 
TeXri ^Q^^ ^oXo^eXXav athCxa nefiipe/e, xai acoXov dXXov e To/f tov exovaa 
xo)Xv^eirj. . , Mfo., athotg = Totg ne^i ^AvTcovtov, Schwrv „ultro illis 
imputavit"; an atholg pro neutro referendum est ad verba Antonii, ita 

1) cf. Kaelker p. 264 et 269. 

2) cf. de brachyl. 

3) cf. de genetivo partitivo. 

4) cf. K. II. p. 1071 m. 

5) cf. K. § 597, g. 



* 1 



K\i 



— 84 - . 

ut idem sit atque nQog avtd?^) Mihi quidem illud veri videtur esse 
similius. 

884, 25 Mfo. — 944, 17 nQovxC&evto sc. at x€(fcdal post ore n()og- 
xPoiTo ri x6(faXrj, Schw. Mfo. 596, 15 eni xiiv tvFQav sc. aQxriv post neQi 
TTJv x^^QOTOTovtav, Mfo. 

328, 17 wg ovSevoc tcovSe 'PMjj^iaoig nQocTrjxovvwv, Mfm. in oi^Sh 
cum Schw.2, qui frustra confert 409, 11; utilius conferuntur 1134, 8 ubi 
Nfc, et 1050, 23. 

1088, 11, 12 ol dQiavot t(ov i(feSQeiwv. cf. 613, 7 (Mfo.) 2) 

13) De ellipsi. 

Appiani neglegentia scribendi cum ex aliis rebus apparet tum ex 
ellipseos usu frequentissimo. 

Ac primum quidem saepissime solet omittere accusativiim pro 
obiecto positum, etiamsi haut facile ex intellectu possit suppleri; quales 
locos congessi 96; e quibus 35 Mafo; cf. 65, 8—10 fisyiQi I^t^q^ov avT(ov 
oT Te paatXetg GvaTdvreg ol xaTa fi&Qog xat caot allot SvvaTot, xTeivovatv 
&Se; Mfm. avc^av in avTov, quod post xTetvovatv supplendum sit. 

172, 22 exO^BovTeg d(pv(o avvevdQaaaov deC Tt xal xTeCvavTeg sna- 
v{eaav, Mfc. nolXovg vel vtvdg, 

294, 4 o S' 8n{veae f^isv (iog d^tontaTOTaTov ix ndvTcov ^xQttco'' 
<r e(frjy Mfc. avTov. 

497, 26 xal ^ficov dfjivvafjtevcov rjSrj, Mfc. ae rjSrj. 
621, 4 nQfa^etg S' h 6S(} xavaXa^ovieg rJQCQTcov, tC fieO^" onkcav int 
Tijv naTQCSa iXaivoi, Mfc. 2vXXav aut avTov, 

810, 14 i&dQQet aTQUTtdv iaayay(t.v ig Tr^v noXtv StaTaQa^at, 

Nfc, TTiv pro ig Trjv, 

1086,24 ivvxTOfidxrjaev , . , . neQi dnav t6 neQtTeCxtafia. xat ov 
SvvrjS^etg dvsd-oQev, Schw. Mfc. otfSev. 

1179, 16 xexeXevaTat S* vn^AvTwvCov noXefiovvza fiCv ae xaTaxavetv, 
iyxetQCCovTa Se nsfinetv ig avTOv ivTCficog, Mfc. iyx^tQitorra Se eavTov. 

Deinde 25 locis (e quibus 3 Mfo.) desideramus genetivum pro 
obiecto positum, imprimis in verbo Seta^at, cf. 90, 18 x^^f^ovg xal 
StaxoaCovg ^PoofiaCuiv Sts(f0^eiQev, dnoXofxevcov S' ath(f StafivQtwv iSetTO 
nQoansfixfjag. 269, 9 firjSe Tcp naQaacfj xaTaytyvcoaxetv , et Tavca xat 
nQt^v elnofiev, ot€ vd onXa ^TetTe. 578, 18 xat neQtidov xard fieQog 

1) cf. de dativo. 

2) cf. de brachyl. 



V 



— 35 — 

exaaTov iSelTo SrjfiaQxov avTov . . , eXfa^at, Mfm. sxaaTov in exdaTcov, 
Fxaacov pertinet ad neQtlcov (cf. 114, 15 Schw. Mfm. 166, 5 Mrs. contra 
Schw. 228, 20. 747, 9. 640,25. 846,25,26. 865,26. 906,9. 937,3, ubi 
comma ante fieTa deleverim. 1001, 1. 1133, 21. 478, 9. 831, 2. 623, 5) 
806, 12 T7]v Te 6a3rjTa Trjv aTQaTrjytx^^v aneSvaavo cog na^d TVQttvvov 
SeSofifvrig vneQ0Q(5v, Mfc. SeSofxevriv, deleto vn€QOQ(ov. — 283, 8 «^i^w 
S' dg dv6nX(ov xaTe(fQr,vovv , Mfc. tcov noXefjtCmv. Genetivus pro attri- 
buto positus deest: 523, 6 odSh S' 6 AevxoXXog elSc^g oi'>Se nQOfia^c^v, 
Mfc. TovT(ov. 961, 24 01} x^f^Qovg ig a^oTrjQtav iaofied^a tcov fir^TeQcov, 
Mfc. ig a(OTriQCav Tfjg naTQCSog, 414, 20 (Mfo.). 469, 6 (Schwfo.) 
1096, 11 (Mfo.). 

Tum dativus pro obiecto positus requiritur (praecipue pronomen 
oP) 48 locis, e quibus 37 Mfo. semel Schwfo. (538, 14), cf. 733, 11 ol 
fiev aQxovTeg avvov nQoaneaovTeg Ixeievov. 642, 9 Jm S' avTovg Trjv 

re d^Cmatv xal neQtovaCav xat teQ(oavvrjv ivTeXrj ndvra dnoSodijvat, 

SC. avT^. 579, 9 iv dyoQa tov vtov indycov exdarotg avvCaTrj xat naQ€- 
Tid^eTo wg — dnoXovfxevog {exdaTotg dependet ab indycov) 84, 20 ScoQedg 
T€ (fSQovTa xat T(ov 2x6ntOQVcov vnofivrjatv Tfjg ig avTOV 2vg)axa (ftXCag, 
xal SerjGtv 'PoofiaC(ov, dv inCcoat, avXXafx§dvetv (M. St. Mfm. in 'P(ofxaCotg). 

Substantivum cum praepositione coniunctum deest 995,23 
Svo Ss xat t6t€ vavg dno^aX6vT€g — SC. ig Trjv n6Xtv — avvexXeCad^rjaav, 
Mfo. 291, 5 iatotlat Se — sc. ig t6 aTQaT^neSov — ot KaQxrjS6vtot Tfjg 
nCXecog txSQafx6vT€g vn7JvT(ov, Mfo. (v. 8 fd. verba ig t6 aTQaT^neSov, 
ceterum cf. 634, 13 — 19. 765, 8 — 14. 879, 1, 3. 880, 3. 882, 15, 26. 
673, 18. 927, 22. 937, 10. 995, 23. 1032, 5); item Mfo. 899, 9 et 1048, 22, 
cf. 58, 24 et 618, 5 qui locus (iasSQafxov svd-a fxrj &Bfxtg p dvSQdatv) 
apte comparatur cum loco 1033, 11 {naQaSovg Se t6 acofxa Tolg (fCXotgl 
iv&a Xa^QaCcog ^dipetav). 

Saepissime deest etiam participium wV, cf. 606, 5 Ovsva(fQov eXcov 
ix nQoSoaCag sxTetve Svo 'PcofxaCcov anetQag — SC. ovaagt— sv avT^, 
Mfo. 887, 13 xaXetv avTcv ig xQCatv rj^Covv^ cog ov ndTQtov a(fCatv dxQtrov 
xaTaStxd^etv, vHfc. cog ov ndTQtov ov, 

789, 26 b Se KalaaQ ig '^Pcofir^v '^neCyeTo int (f6^ov xat S^^rjg 

sc. wV — otag ov Ttg nQ6 tov, Mrs. coUato loco 640, 1 ; quales locos 
congessi 46, e quibus 24 Mafo. 

Participium y€v6fxevog deest 161ocis, e quibus 13Mafo.; cf.321, 1 

noXefxov inC(fo^ov fjSeaav, Std t€ dvS^eCav xal (fQ^vrjfxa xal T^Xfxav 

ex^Q^v xai dmarCav iv a(fCatv intxCvSvvov y€v6fX€voVy post a(fCatv sup- 



- 36 - 

plendum est Yevofisvtjv, Mr. (f(f,'(nv refert ad Romanos. ^) 422, 9 "AXf^avSQog 
fisv S^ ^aadevg ^v enl mQaatg Iv^iov, 6 xul navcMV ^aadevg — SC. 
yevofisvog — Zawv €i(hv, Nfc. ^aadevaag, cf. H. B. p. 34, qni ellipsiii 
statuendam esse non perspexit. 

Post (Lg nonnusquam desideramus participium, cf. 150,26 6 
Sf, w^— sc. (ov-fv ^a(j^(X(jofg va xal fS^r^TKjafv avn^v, . . . . rrjv xfjutjv 
evfjXXaaae. 62, 16. 593, 17 cet., post rhe 152, 18 chi(.Mvvvo iWc Tdiv 
1/171 f(av aie xarfdafifiavovran' ate ne^ovg; contra 11 (e quibus 10 Mafo.) 
inveni locos, quibus deesset a5c ante participia seu tradita seu supplcnda, 
Cf. 713, 23 eQf&tana xaxa tov KaiaaQog - sc. (^g — oj^x rlmjStSf^vTfK, 
Mfo. 42, 3 6 nvQQfjg ... Ttiv vfjaov ~~ sc. o^ - ofxet(,v — sc. or>aav - 
avTl Tfig^lTaXtag neQte^kfneTo, Mfo.; item aie deest, 1001, 3 oihe xhiid- 
x(ov rj nvQYOH' ffinenQriafifvajv evn(jQovvTeg, Nfc. iUe ffiji. 

«^deest ante substantivum cum praepositione coniunctum 

568, 9 ix raXavtag ^Xavvev inl tov nfjfim\tfw - SC. dg — inl Tyjv na- 
TQiSa, Mfo. 810, 5 Ta vnofivTJfxava . . . . fieTexfjfu^eTo , dve Trjg yt'i'«^xoc 
avTa Tf;g KataaQog - SC. (hg - i'^ fntxtvSvvfJv Tfhe otxtac . . . . fifTa- 
ifeQovarig, Mfo.^ 858, 4 VorVcov Totg noUotg (h^axeQclvag o KalaaQ - 
— sc. wc — eg v^Qtv elQiififvotg (xnexc^Qet, Mfo., cf. 852, 21 (Mfo.) 

Verbum fipri (ecpaaav, (faatv) omittit A. 50,18 orc yr/frorc ^' /6- 
Setxvve 'PfofiaCfjtg ^otTot fjl tt^v ^o^v zr]v ^uQetav IfvTeg cet., Bernh. 
f. 0. 447, 12 'leQ(.Wvfiog S^ oi^^ entipavaat vfov i&vcov oUok, «//' (hf} 
Triv naQdltov Trjg DafKfvXtag xal Kdtxiag hfQ((v Mv int Tf)v JaQfmv 
TQanfa&at sc. fy^, quod f. c. Ruhl in Jahnii annal. vol. 127, p. 739. 
319, 20 Mrs. contra R. et Schw. collato loco 293, 23 (Scbwfo!) 854, 5 
St. Schw. Nfo., 990, 2 non repugnat quominus teneamus. 347, 23 Schw 
•Mfo., cf. 427, 15. 1033, 10. 

^ ^Post oafj^g verbum desideramus 737, 13 '6aa y^q elneTv ent 

007 ^"^ ^^^"^' '^'''"^'' • ■ • '^^''' (^vveaTt, Mu. St. Mfo.; cf. 165, 27 

297, 21; omnino verba finita quae ex intellectu possint suppleri, nonnus- 
quam desunt, cf. 60, 12 (sc. IfY^Tat; ceterum nescio an deleto fSf^^e v 7 
punctoque posito post 'Ptcfiatfjtg llfYeTo trahendum sit ad insequontia: 
sed cf. 928, 22. 929, 6! 519, 22. 523, 9 Bfm.?) 854, 9 ./ f^sv t. .at 
t(ov YeYovfjTfov fieTa&ea^at ^eXetg (Svvaaat y«> el ^fkefc)' et S^ fu] 
la Ye Xotnd cet , post ^fXetg supplendum fieTa^ov vel potius fieTa^ia^at' 
aexeXevto, cf. 275, 6 xat ivaYt^eTe avTotg ineQx^fievfu xat Tfjtg leQotg 
^W^.'>lere ent6vTeg - sc. ^veTe ~ , vd Si kotnd xai^fJifOfxev, 

1) cf. de signif. verb. 



1- 



- 37 — 

cf. 861, 1 xat ig Td n(oXrjTrJQta neQtitov xrjQvaaetv fleYev 6aov SvvatvTo 
navTa vovg ntnQdaxovvag fVKtYiaTov SC. ntnQfiaxetv , Nfd. , Mfm. ») 

iiv mente supplendum est 1015, 5 (Mfo.) 627, 19. 566, 14. 764 4 
822, 11 (Mfo.), favfo 951, 22 (Mfo.), alia verba 379, 10 (Schw Mfo )' 
1139, 21 (sc. elnev). 1035, 24 (Mfo.). 1180, 8 (Mfo.). 147, 19 (sc' 
iveYfvfTo, M. Schwfo.). 

Latius patet ellipsis qualem exhibent loci 1075, 7 t6v fih 
'AvT(6vtov o{>Ssv dU rj xQ7]fiaTa fiova dYeiQetv. 1178, 17 x«^ otWv in' 
fQYco TotfoSe nXffjv rj atl^tg ig t6 fiea^Yetov ixcoQet, cf. 1107 7 764 9 
Infinitivus facile suppletur 812, 17 Toig ahovat ne^l KaiaaQog ^pfj^(^(jv 
— SC. avaSo^fjvat - dvc^Yxrj TaSe nQoetSfvat, Mfo. 996, 3 fXmZ^ov y^q 
Tt TotovTo - SC. faea^at ~ hne^ffQeTO nvQYovg. 1001, 5 xeQaiag Totg 
Tetxeat nQoavtHvTeg fhg Std xKtfidxfov - sc. dva^aivetv — ineyeioovv 
d. 1094, 17. 76, 22. 1131, 1. 121, 22. 196, 28. 337, 2. 413, 23^ 
quibus locis omnibus Mafo. ' ' 

Subiectum quoque nonnusquam deest, et in genetivo absoluto 
(228, 9 t6v Sf xivSvvov . . . ixaTeQog {meQen^^Qev, 'Avvt'^ac fiev oTt 
KaQxr^Sova xal At^vy dnaaav oSe 6 ^ycov xQtvei, rj SovXrjv ei'>&vg ^a- 
ao}fifva)v eivat rj ig to snetva aQxetv, Mrs. contra K. Item 954 24 
417, 11. 747, 11. 1062, 14 Mafo., cf. 593, 10. 643, 12. 1117 11) et 
in accusativo et infinitivo: 767, 7 ^ aTQaTtd S' iftaQTVQet^ xa^dneQ 
fv&ovv ig ixdaTr^v zd^tv fieTa^fovTa nolld xat lafinQd SQaaat, Mu. 
Mfo. 794, 16 TavTr^g Sk axon(ov ^YOVfiat irryc nQoa^xr^g d(fOQfjiriv ka^etv 
sc. a^novg, Mfo. 883, 15 avvojfivvov §x6vTeg ovx ixXeiipetv Trjv ig 'Av- 
T(ovtov eivotdv Te xal niavtv, «g dnoQfjaat — sc. Ttva — Tiveg i]aav 
olnQo oXiYov . . i^Xaa(frjfiovv, Schwrv. „ut dubitari posset, cf. 593, 10 
et 884, 10. — Similiter comparati sunt loci 876, 14. 889 9 998 6 
10l»4, 4, quibus Mfo. 

Pronomina quoque desideramus aliis locis alia, imprimis Ttg, aihog, 
(JVTog, cf. 842, 6 oil Y(^Q Ttg a{^TOtg iSoxet MaYVov Y^vfxsd^at SrifioxQa- 
TtxtoTeQog, od^ev ovSf neQtno^rjTOTeQog — sc. Ttg — ^v, Mfo. 954, 21 2) 
(ftXoSeanoTog Ss olxfTr^g t6v xexTrififvov inl U(fov ixd^tae, Mfc. Ss 
Ttg otx. (cf 954, 18. 955, 4. 952, 20. 950, 13. 955, 11, 18. 971, 10) 
305, 25 el (po^eQog avvfjtg eir^ xai Si avvo xat Svaentxet^QrjTog. Nfc. 
«i'fo Tovio^ 1113, 11 f)'AvTo]vf.og iveSiSov xal tov nofin^tfjv dvaxfOQetv 
ixsXevev ig 2txeXiav wg intfjieXrja6fievog ~ sc. avTog - t(ov avYxei- 

1) cf. de coll. verb. 

2) cf. de genet. part. 



r'-> * rv 



<^ r^*i.ti' i L!$^ 



h 



— 38 - 

[AfVMv, Mfo.; accediint loci 352, 19. 685, 2. 80, 12. 637, 21. 759, 23. 
849, 9, quibus Mafo.; fi6vog omittitur 548, 23, jTQwiog 444, 21. 

Adverbia et particulas, praesertim ubi extant participia, desi- 
deramus 36 locis (e quibus 36 Mafo.), imprimis f^wvov, t6t€, a^a, atU 
oiiiMg, tTL, (bSe, afxa, fidhava, cf. 992, 3 ai xal naQa nokefiiocg laxvovabv, 
ov nagd (fiXoig xal XQOifevaiv. 722, 4 xal 6 Sf^fJLog . . . ixexQaYU 

KaCaaQa xal nofinrjtov dnoO^&a^ai rdg Svvaaveiag KixiQmv 

6e xai — sc. tote — nefinetv eg KaiaaQa StaXXaxmg. 566, 9 syxetQiStu 
nokXdxtg (peQovTmv, xTtwvfievrjg ts — SC. det — Ttvog dQxfjg ex Staatrj- 
fxaTog ev leQotg r^ ixxXrjaiatg. 980, 25 evvovg Se djv Totg Ilofinrjfavotg 
Std vdSe xaTeyiyvtoaxev — sc. ofmg — det Trjg fioiQag wc dTVxovarjg 
dfietXixTcog. 1140,3 x«r« SaifAova S' dfjKpoTtQiov — SC, dfxa — nQoatovtmv 
Tif) QevfiaTt, 'AvTcovtog .... earjXaTO. 1034, 2 xat to Stoovvfxov r^v avKov 
t6 ''AQetov, o ent Ttfxf^ Tf^g dXxfjg — SC. (oSe — (ovdfia^ov. 

Praepositiones denique ab A. post xat, rj, «c, waneQ, ota non 
iterari nihil est proprii^), nihilominus e 18 locis undecies Mafo.; cf. 945, (>. 
988, 18. 624, 2. 949, 3. 

14) De anticipatione. 

Anticipationis usus Appianeus satis frequens est, imprimis in verbi.s 
cognoscendi, rogandi, dicendi^); quales locos habemus hos: 

165, 21 ovSe Tovg nevTaxoaiovg etSoTeg oTt rjaav nevTaxoatot. 
222, 6 nv^ofiBvtp neQt aihdSv oTt Seot notetv. 235, 4 iniSeaO^e Tr]v 
dvdyxrjv ^ yeyovev. 273, 6 taTe avTovg oTt dnta^r^aav. 253, 23, 24 
eiSov Tr]v noXtv oarj ^v. 570, 9 TavTa S' cncog eyeveTo, avviyQaipa. 
648, 20 otx bxoi Triv ahiav avfi^aXetv St rjv eyeveTo. 794, 14 rjSeaav 
athov firj^). 838, 6 nQoetnovTog Tr^v rjfxiQav Trjg TeXevirjg, oTt fjtr^ ne- 
Qtoiaet Tag etSovg, Mfd. r. ly. r. t. 904, 5 avveiSoTeg t6 xQdvtavov cog 
eLrj. 938, 26 eg ^fidg, ota nenovd^afxev, oqcov. 1185, 7 fxaO^cov neQt Tfjg 
fxr^TQog (og etrj xa&etQyfxevrj. 

Quibus locis simillime comparati sunt 981, 16 Setaat neQt Tfjg 
dvax(OQfjae(og fxri dnoxXetaO^eirj ^) et 941, 26 ig SvaeXntaviav , fxr^Seva 
Qvaead-ai Ttva nQoaSoxcov. 

Id autem anticipationis genus, quod ubi extat, notio anticipata 

1) cf. Loesch et Krebs p. 10, § 3, 1. 

2) cf. Kr. § 61, 6, 2. K. U p. 1082, 4. 

3) cf. de bracbyl. 

4) cf. Kr. § 61, 6, 5, 



( 



— 39 — 

seu mutata seu non mutata structura repetitur in ipso enuntiato, 
exhibent loci hi: 

62, 27 — 63, 2 Soxoiat Si fxot Qoivtxeg otxfjaat . . . ."^'EXXrjveg 
ve ()fXoio)g nXeovveg, efifxeivat xal vcovSe w^c. 153,10 Ta Se ent O^dTeQa... 

vvv fxhv eavt xat TavTa. 167, 25 ^ Se noXtg ot fxev eO^Qrjvovv^) 

197, 26 drio ydQ TQiafxvQimv dvSQcov .... oXiyot fxoXtg avvcov SteSQaaav, 
Mfo. 158, 7 ^ovg Se oaag et^ev, .... Totg xpQaatv avTcov SaSag ne- 
Qted^xev, Schw. Mfo. 270, 24 neQt Se Tfjg dvotxiaecog, et Tq) Soxet 
TovTo . . . nQOTi^ead^at. 358, 12 ev rotg vnofxvrjfxaat . . . ev TotaSe. 
429, 8 (faat . . . . Toi>g fxdyovg xeXevofxevovg . . . xpeiaaaO^at Tovg 
fxdyovg, Mfo. 827, 15 ovx d^tov . . . ToaovSe dvSQ^g entvd(ptov . . . 
nrrr^l yeveaOat, N. Mfd. avT(o. 47, 24 Tfjg yf^g tcov KeXvdov ovx dQxovarjg 
avrotg. 835, 8 avvefiri S* avvotg xat rd avQaToneSa 6fxoio)g nQod^vfxa 
fiev eg dfxqw . . . yeveaS^at. 840, 6 Kdaatog xat BQOVTog . . . fJQrjVTO 
xat oTSe. 1141, 3 6 XQovog avTotg {■■Xrjye rfjg dQxfjg, ^Totg TQtatv eiprj(ftavo 
dvSQaatv, Mfo. 1168, 18 6 Se aTQarog ovxeTt fxev ovSetg e^p^eyyeTo. 
1013. 17 dXX' ovx, d(p ov KaiaaQ eSvvdavevaev , ovx aQxrjv uva — 
exetQOTovfjaaTe, Mfo. 

15) De attractione. 

Attractiouem saepius admittit A. in pronominibus relativis, et 
ubi referuntur casuque attrahuntur ad substantivum^), quod aut 
praecedat, veluti 567, 23 {xaxcov dwiSoatg ^v (Sv 6 IvXXag eiQydCevo, 
Mfo., cf. Sch.) 334, 3 (vcov xQ^f^dTwv d^fixev wv ht do^fetXev, Mfc. « 
vel oaa) 734, 10 {nfxrjTdg Se tcov (ovi(ov dne^prjvev (ov eSet Tovg xQ^(rtdg 
Totg Saveiaaatv dvvt t(ov xQW^^^^^ StSovat, Schw. Mrm. otg in (Sv) 
422, 9. 444, 22. 234, 15. 664, 9. 631, 22. 736, 24. 832, 9 {ev ^fxeQatg 
atg xaXovatv etSotg MaQriatg). 832, 15. 880, 6, 7. 914, 8. 966, 10. 
1003, 13. 1026, 17. 1145, 11. 1170,5, aut insequatur,^ vehit 118, 1 

{xai Tovg vn avT^ ndvvag ^g e^ovat yf^g aQxetv, Schwfo.; 567, 23. 
409, 8, 9 nihil probant) 372, 3 {Tafxtelov evxatQov eg rd Xotnd &v 
enevoet ndvvoiv eaea^at, Mfo.). 1145, 15, et ubi supplendum est 
pronomen demonstrativum^), vehit 581, 2 {^eovg eyxaXvnvofxevog 
(ov l-fxeXXe SQdaetv) 584, 6 {SvvaTog xavaaxetv wv vnoaxotTo) 121, 22 
(ubi accedit praepositio^); quales loci extant multi. 

1) cf. de fig. %ara avvsaiv. 

2) cf. Kr. § 51, 10. 

3) cf. Kr. § 51, 10, 1. 

4) cf. K. p. 913. 



. ■ ■ .'gT-r' ; 



l| • 



i 



i* 



— 40 - 

In infinitivo quoque saepius invenitur attractio') ita ut participii 
cuiusdam cum eo couiungatur aut genetivus, veluti 918, 7 {Aem^ov ^U 
f^v iih ^otdrjv SeSt6rog . . ., vni(Txvovfjifvov S' ofiu^ ox noX^ii\auv 
txovzog, Mrs. ^xcvrog contra Musgr.), aut dativus (52, 25 olg sSlSomxv 
(.dv alvat (fCXotg. 620, 20. 270, 26 aliis). 

Numeri attractio nem exhibent loci 004, 6 {(jvveMveg re ^riloig 
xo x^axiazov (og eirj Trjg exavegov CTQaTiac , Schwfc. elev . Nfc. ofm, 
Mfo.) et 657, 7 (m re alx^dk^^Ta . . . 2vUag, oti 2avvlTai to nXeov 
i]v, xaTrixf^VTiaev) , generis 892, 9 xal yeqag Tolg firjvvovai SexccTyv 
vneaxrjfxsv(ov, rjv SmXaaLciaofxev vfxeTg, Nfc. o. 

16) De brachylogia. 

Brachylogiae exempla apud A. haud rara sunt. 

Ac primum quidem haec figura usu venit in genetivo compara- 

tiyo2) his 5 locis: 177, 3 iXn,t(.,v Sk Tovg avQaTriyfng ai'c(ov ^nb Ka 
nvrjg dvaarrjaeiv ^ avTcg ti Kanvr^g fiel^ov eQydaea&at. 940, 16 x(xi 
T6Se Si dfiag ov^ ^aaov i^fi^v (= ov^ ^aaov ij St r]fxag). 428, 3 TaySe 
ydQ dQFaxofxat fxakXov tov NtxdvoQa xTetvat. 30, 18 fietCov S' otxav 
evQotg ^ld^og v6(ov ofiov nevTe fxvQtdS(ov, Nfc. cUvfi^vwv. 278, 16 
xai afxtxQOTeQa fxsv ta(og Ta xsQSrj, ^e^atoveQa Ss xat (IxtvSvvfheQa xa- 
Mna^ Td Tijg ye(OQytag rwv SfxnoQcov, Schwfc. tcuv ifxnoQtx(ov , Mfi'. 
Tdv T^v ifxn6Q(ov; deinde saepius dvTt cum genetivo extat, ubi ex- 
spectamus totum enuntiatum, quo distinguatur per oix — dUd^): 239, 19 
xat r^yavdxTOVv, el iv hfxa. tov atTov ol ccQxovTeg alQovvTat 'P(ofxatotc 
dvTt T^v noXtT(ov ig rdg dvoxdg naQaaxetv. 873, 23 ig ^fxag dvT hxeC- 
vtov r« ZnXa fieTeveyxetv , Mfo., cf. 881, 14 dvTt rr}g 'AvtcovCov fxtxQo- 
loyCag . . . ^ Tr^v KaCaaQog fxvrjfxr^v fxeravC^ea^at (874, 16 nihil probat). 
893, 18 (fovov xaTriyoQ(ov noXsfuov xotvov dvTt tcov (OQtafXsvcav intTt- 
fxC(ov Tolg (fovevat TCd^eTat, Schwfv. „non contentus poenis*; quales locos 
inveni 20. 

Nonnusquam etiam exspectamus enuntiatum a nQlv incipiens, cum 
legamus nQo cum genetivo: 623, 15 oi^Te v^^fxov o^va nQo rf^g 
Pov% ig To n^^og iacpeQ^fievov. 1024, 14 ot Ss mXtnnot n6hg iarlv 
ri JdTog (^vofidCeTO ndlat xal KQr^vCSeg STt nQo Jdrov , Nfc. n^d tov. 
1034, 22 dyavaxTovvTeg Ss ol dvSQeg oTt xQeCrrovg ovTeg dkxrjv 

1) cf. K. § 475. 

2) cf. Kaelker p. 270. 
8) cf. Kr. § 68, 14, 1. 



- 41 — 

St' duQa^Cag dn(olXvvTo, ot fxsv nQO tov nvQog iavTovg dvr^Qovv, Schwrv. 
„non exspectato incendio^ cf. 782, 1. 861, 24. 862, 16, 1. 987, 17.' 870, ll' 
Similem brachylogiam invenimus in fierd cum accusativo cou- 
luncto 748, 19 dv S dnetO^fj, Tavra nQoardaaetv 'AvTonCo), xat tqCuo 
fxerd TSvjAvToovtov Ka^v^o. 955, 2 xveCvet tov loyayov .*. . . fxevd Ss 
ixetvov savvov inavatQcov elne (Mfc. ixeCvo)) 964 !^ 18 in d()eCag i'e- 
snXevaev ig Bqovtov xat ig MCXr^Tov fxecd Bqovtov (Mfc. fi. B. djioO^a- 
roVr«) 1056, 10 iyCyvevo yd^ cJi) xai fxe^d Kdaat6v ue xai Bqovt(jv 
sveQa ifx^fvha ofxota (= fxerd rd K. xai B. SfKpvha) 1062, 2 'Ad^vaCotg 
S' ig avTov iX^ovat fxerd Tfjvov Atytvav sScoxe („pro Teno Aeginam de- 
dit- Schwrv., modo adiecisset ,pro Teno iam antea data% Mfm.; ceterum 
in rem non inquisivi) 215, 21 ipe^aaad^at fxsv ^eovg, ipevaaa^at Ss 
fiecd Tovg ^eovg'P(ofxaCovg, Mrm. fxerd tcuv ^e(ov^), cf. 1111, 5. 874 5; 
in ini cum dativo coniuncto 422, 8 'AXs^avSQog fxsv S^ ^aatlevg ^v 
ini BsQaatg 2tQ(ov. 1021, 14 ig Ahov d(pCxovTo xai ini Aivq> zl^Qtaxov, 
Mfc. ig J.,m nQog cum accusativo coniuncto 1128, 18 6 Ss Uofxnijtog 
Trjg fxsv avTOfxoUag tov MrjvoS(6Qfjv , intnXsovTog rjSrj KaCaaQog, rja^eTfj, 
uQog os Tov sxaTSQ(o&ev inCnXovv avvog fxsv vnsfietvev iv Meaarjvr] 
Tov KaCaaQa, in ix 1041, 4 dvSQdatv inetyofxsvotg ^no hfxov xai dno- 
ytyvcoaxovatv ix t(ov dUo)v savTovg (=z postquam de omnibus aliis rebus 
desperaverunt), in nQo 1016, 5 xai rolvSe rolg novr^Qotg rjyefx^veg elaiv 
ol TQetg dvSQeg,^ avvoi nQo t(ov dXlcov dSel(fovg xai ^eCovg xai int' 
TQdnovg nQoyQdipavreg. 

Zeugma^) legimus 221, 22 ol Ss hjtnoC vtvQo^axofxevot xai iQsa- 
aovveg S(p^aaav ig vov hfisva, cf. 682, 13 xai Svo fxsQr^ vov avQavov 
xai a^Thg avvancolevo avvoXg et 246, 6 ndvT(ov da^evetg xai dnoQfjt, 
St. Rfo., et 1094, 25 xai nQoreQov xai vvv i^pQovr^aa pro xai nQ(jveQ(JV 
S(fg6vr^aa xai vvv (/qovoI quod premitur iterato (pQf)V(ov sm, quare Nfm. 
Cum anticipatione quadam coniuncta est brachylogia 857, 2 
TieQi Ss T(ov awv xq^kov, i^sXovva fxsv ae . . . SaveCaaa^at r^y^jvfxr^v dv 
elQowetav Isyetv. 922, 10 vd re svayxog vavva xai Bfjfxn^tov Mdyv(jv 
avvotg xai Joloj^mav nQOV(peQOV (cf. 640, 5) 991, 11 nQog as Ss c^ 
Kdaate xat atSwg vtg savtv i^aCQevog sg ve Tr^v n()hv . . . , Schwfc. noog 
afjv, Mfo. 1052, 14 (Mu. B. Schw. Mfo., cf. etiam 1055, 26). 454, ^16 
242, 17. 726, 19. 1181, 4. 

Jam restant brachylogiae tam variae, ut certa lege circumscribi 
non possint, exempla haec: 

1) cf. de pleon. ad 625, 15. 

2) cf. K. § 597 s. 



»< » ■!■ 






— 42 - 

570, 7 ofioicog ixBivu) pro ofxoiMc rf, exetvov Svvc^juiei^). 579, 1 
ixf^levev tavTO) Tr)v sxxXrjCtav smv^f^ipca, Mfc. sniacaGtav vel STtKTra- 
Ttutv (cf. 547, 24). 902, 17 ovx rjvsYxe Ttjv ^a^jVTrjTa tov KixeQwvog, 
aXl" eg rag KaiaaQog anoixiag exSfjaficov ojg yvw(jipLog Svo eg tov 'Av- 
TMveov iev€(TT(jciT€vG€ Tfkrj , Schwrv. „revocatis ad Antonii militiam*', 
Mfo., hg ter recurrens me non offendit). 

594, 9 o Sa noXmxog ox^og &^6a mg yevo/x&vrjg ev exxkrjatn ^Qovvf^g, 
oS-ev ov O-ejuiig eail 'Poofiatoig cwSev eu xvqovv. 

627, 8 /aAe/tr^AVwv pro /a^e/m^^g^v inoxQivofievog, Mfo. 302, 25 
el^ aeXnTov xal ^Qaxeog, nequaquara accurate dictum pro e^ deknTov ix 
^Qaxeog, St. Mfo. , Schwfv. „praeter spem, brevi, quo abfui, tempore, in 
tantum auctae sunf, ^Qaxvg enim, ut saepius apud A., hic intellegendum 
est non brevis sed exiguus (cf. 177, 27. 983, 7. 402, 7 alios) et oi per 
attractionem positum est pro iv &!. Sed quoquomodo res se habet, bra- 
chylogiam adesse nemo potest negare. 

562, 12 ToaoaSe elg ovTog noXefiog xal noixilog eyeveTo, Kfc. cJjf 
noix, vel ovTU) nocx, 

953, 3 rj 6' vnoxQivafievrj fiev iXO^elv ineiyeaS^at, SeStevat <J' wg 
iv vvxTt xat O^eQanatvatg to vnoncoVy N. Mfo. 

1040, 9 xal hfxcjg 7]^ r]^i^ aacfi^g, eg t€ fihyed^og xal Seog exdaTTjg 
rjfieQag ineyiyveTo, Mfo.; qui quattuor loci miram quandam exhibent 
duarum notionum contractionem. 

376, 8 dn€Q ov Totg cfikotg dXXd Totg '^TTtjfxevotg Tovg xexQaTtj- 
xoTag ijitxeXevetv, Schwfc. dneQ ov ifilovg Totg (fiXotg cet. 

627, 17 Tovg veonolicag rJQeO^tCov ig t6 ivOvfii^fia tov MaQt'ov, 
Tatg ifvXaig, — sc. ndaatg — dvafuxOfjvai, Mfo. 

741, 19 6 Se KataaQ tov Ilofinrjiov tov ^Ak(OQa noTafiov iv fieoco 
S^efxevog iaTQUToneSevaev, Schw. Mfo.; 644, 14. 759, 25 alii non valent 
ad mutandum; ceterum cf. etiam 297, 1 (Schwfv.?). 

379, 10 r« "AXneta ctQri • • vneQr^jXOov eg t€ Trjv ^ltaUav, vfiwv 
ovSevctg nm OaQQovvTog, ifi^akwv, dveaTrjaa, Schw. Mfo. 

467, 23 waT€ xat n€Qt twv dXkaiv (ftXoaocfwv dnoQov nof^aat xat 
tnoniov, €tT€ St^ dQ€Trjv, €tT€ neviag xat dnQa^iag Tr^v aocfiav eOevTO 
naQafxvd^tov, Nfc. iCrjXcoaav post dQ€Tr]v. 

496, 2 (t)Qvyiav Se aot Mdvtog eScoxev int SmQoSoxia , , , xat TqTSe 
fxdXiaTa avTr]v bfxoXoyetg ov Stxaicog Xa^etv, ix SooQoSoxiag, Schwfc. ix 
S, Xa^cov, Mfo. 



1) cf. de dat. 



— 43 - 



501, 16 xat yrjg dvaSaafXovg iQyaaafxevo) xat XQ^^v dnoxondg xat 
SovXcov eXevOeQcoaetg , xal TVQdvvovg in^ ivioig, xal Xfjai;rJQta noXXd, 
Mfc. TVQ. intoTriaavTt iviotg, 

644, 18 aTQaTtdv xal TQOtfdg xal ;f(>^jUara avvfjyov, ovSev, cog n€Qt 
iaxaTcov, aqiatv dnoXeinovTeg, Mfc. wc tcov iaxaTo^v a^jiat neQteaTMVwv, 
Nfc. n€Qt iaxdccov xtvSvvevovveg. * 

658, 16 ol fxev eavTovg dvfiQovv , ot S^ dXXrjXovg ex6vT€g, 01 Se 
xat ^Qc^xotg avvenXexovTo, Mfc. ex6vT€g i(f6v€vov, 

658, 17 xat TagO-VQag ivecfQaTTov eceQOt, xcd ivenifinQaaav, Schwfc. 
xal Trjv n6Xtv iven. 

169, 3 ot fxev 01* X '^^iovv .... ^Xa^rjvat t^v noXtv oi^>Se SovXovg 
fxev iXevd-eQovv, tovq Se iXevOeQovg vneQOQccv, Stfc. Tovg Se iXevO-eQovg 
SovXevovTag, Mfo. cf. 376, 8. 

660, 10 iyxXijfiaTa S^ r^v xat ^evia xat (ftXia xat Sdvetafxa, Xa^/tv- 
Tog ij ScvTog, 

689, 11 — 13 tjg iQoov KotVTog KovQtog, dvrJQ St cveiSrj noXXd Tfjg 
^ovXf^g dnecoafxevog xal TfjaSe Tf]g KaTtXiva avvO-rjxr^g ri^toofxevog, xot>(f oog 
fxdXa xat (ftXoTificog i^e(f€Q€v ota nQog iQCOfievriv, d)g avTixa SvvaatevacoVy 
Mfc. i^e(f€Qe T€ ndvTa nQog avTrjv xat ifxeyaXavx^fi^o ota . . . 

697, 21 ivtaTafievcov Se noXXcov — SC. ze dXXo)v — xat KdTO)vog, 
Mfo., cf. 698, 19. Mfo. 543, 20. Nfm. 253, 13. Schw. Mfm.i) 

877, 24 ig dXXoTQioiatv tcov xXrjQovxtdov Kai,aaQt,^) Mfo. 

928, 12 v6fxq) S^ eTeQO) dneXve fxri eivat noXefxtov JoXo^eXXav, xat 
eivat (f6vov Sixag int Kai,oaQty Schwfc. xat ed-eco eivat, Mfc. xat TQico) 
eivat. 

949, 15 xat nXeiovg oip6fX€vot avved-eov fj dxQocufievot M. r. adno- 
tavit „exspectabas fj nQocov dxQoaa6fX€vot^ , sed nihil mutandum. 

993, 26 Ta S^ avcd xat BQOVTog Vfxlv nQOT€iv€t ipLr^^fiafiaca xat 
IIofxnTJtog . . , ., cdg S^ txeceiag int colg iprj(fiafxaat xat olSe ndvceg, oaot 
(fevyovatv dno Tfjg ^ovXfjg, ot fxev eg ifxe xat Bqovtov, ot S^ ig llofxnr^toVy 
Mr. adnotavit ad xat „exspectabas notovvTat'', sed nihil mutandum. 

1114, 22 d fxev Srj ylafitrjv6g ve xat IlaQ&valot Sodaavceg enax)^ov, 
T^ IlaQd^txfi Sr^Xcoaet yQa^f^^ Mfc. eSQaadv ce xat enaOov. 

886, 16 vno^vyta . . . xaTed-ve xat i^aQixeve, fxtj xQ^vtog ly noXtoQxia 
yevotTOy Nfc. Seet fxrj; similiter comparati sunt loci 794, 14. (Schw. Mfo.) 
1039, 16 (Nfo.; ceterum cf. 897, 24) 1136, 12. — 



1) cf. de particula te. 

2) cf. de dativo. 



«#■ 



«w 



*l! 



ii! 



I ' 






- 44 - 

m 

^081,4 smaToX^v fSeixvv noXefietv, C. liberius vertit „hac 

sentoiitia'*. 

1 157, 1 oijie vvxvog i&aQQovv . . . Uvtu St dneiQiav cScov xal HV^§Qccg, 
Zippel fc. (fo^ov 8vi-6Qag, 8t' evfSQag =^ Sia <f6^ov €V€Sqc3v^) 

1053, 2 neQtf^aU cs Tij dQtacri q>otvtxtSt, Mfc. v. d. tc5v tavTov 
(fotv., eodem pertinent loci 1005, 13 G04, 21. 613, 7 2) 1016, 7,3) qui- 
biis Mfo. 

1131, 1 Tag euntUQafXfvag fxcoXvasv = vdg ifjtn. SfimnQafjiFvag ^) 
ixtalvaev aiit = rac Pim. Sfx ctnQavat ixcoXvaev.^) 

Jam reliquos locos verbis non expressos liceat adiungere: 
1115, 15. 943, 22. 713, 1. 892, 13. 894, 19. 1033, 12. 1050, 10. 
1089, 20. 107, 24, quibus locis Mafo. (129, 2 Mrs. contra St.); quo acce- 
dunt 660, 10. 853, 3. 852, 4. 855, 3. 878, 18. 970, 6. 1153, 3. 

17) De pleonasmo. 

Ad pleouasmum ex eis, quae supra tractavi, pertinent: primum figura 
etymologica accusativi, deinde fxaUov cum comparativo, tum fid- 
XtaTa cum superlativo coniunctum. 

Quo accedit superflua quaedam structura particulae nkriv^): 
834, 1 nXijv €1 firj, 1020, 3 n^v ix fiovrig MaxeSovtag. 1080, 9 nliiv 
t^rjg yv(6firjg fi6vrjg. 43, 10 nXrjv ScSSsxa fjtovcov. 

Omnino fiovog vocabjulo similem in modum solet uti, cf. 1099, 1 
dvei^ Trjg /?or% fi6vrjg. 1099, 13 xfOQtg Tov^HifataTeCov fiovov. 830, 13 
XcoQtg fiovov Mxfiov. 835, 19 ovSh rj XQarrjaat fx6vov. 1127, 4 dvev tov 
nQoaconov fi6vov (798, 16 Mfo.). 

Item pronomen avTog satis moleste nobis videtur positum esse 

178, 24 ov ydQ 6 ye avv OiovXsun aiQaTog ^v avT(^ ndfxuav d^t6fiaxog. 
539, 22 TTj S' sntovari x(*^Qf()v xixvfka^e neQtxQtjfivov, ov fita eg avTo 
dvfjSog p, Mfo. 1175, 19 'Ar^v6^aQ^ov . . inev6et avUa^etv ex nQoSoaiag 
KovQtov Ttvog T(ov dficpl Tov "Ariv6^aQfi(jv, iXntt(ov eg dvTtSoatv avcov 
fieydXrjv s^etv fiotQav 'Arjv6^aQ^ov Mfd. «i-roiT. ^) 

Valde vero amasse videtur A. nimium usum pronominis Ttg, cf. 

1) cf. de numero plurali. 

2) cf. de fig. xaTrt avvtoiv. 

3) cf. de articulo. 
"*) cf. de participio. 

5) cf. de ellipsi infinitiTi. 

6) cf. K. II. p. 988, 8. 

7) cf. de pron. et de praep. 



— 45 — 



580, 2 OL fiev avTov i(fvXaTTov otd Tiveg SoQVipoQot. 603, 13 iieaovrwv 
Se fMvSe ot^Se t(ov dXXo)v 'Pcofiatwv r]v ctg (fetSco, Nfc. hTi 793, 18 eUe 
d/ioyvovg, eUe xdfiV(ov .... eUe ttaiv ix^Qotg Trjg 7c6Xeu)g d(ftaTdfievog, 
Mfc. cotg. 900, 9 covg Te dXXovg 6aot ctvsg s^vovg rj acQacov 'Pcofiaim' 
dQxovatv, Nrs. ctvsg, B. Mfm. in Ttv6c. 73, 25 ovSsv Tt nQofiaO^cov. 744, 4 
c(ov ctg KataaQog etg intSQafidov covg Svo dvstXsv, Nfd. cig^) 8, 13 ot 

Ss c/vsg aih(ov ig ^EtxsXi^av nXsvaavcsg nQoasncaiaav. 551,7 o^c 

vtv fisv sci avyyvMaofisvcov ct 'PcofiaiMv , (Nfd. ci, cf. 172,23. 396, !.''>. 
555, 2), quales locos congessi 50. 

Porro abundantiam quandam elocutionis ^) ostendunt loci lii: 

524, 18 rjv ctva n6Xtv int Ttfirj cfj snvcov t^aatXsvg iv ixsivm 
yevsad^at t^j x«W (J^'v(()xt^e, Schwfv. ^condiderat", cf. 506, 24 R. Mfo.*^') 

576, 11 (og xat dxovTa ^taa6fisvog, cf. 856, 11. 

580, 20 nQcocog i^fJQxs crjg oSov. 

o98, 7 deC Tt fivaog sxdaTov STOvg iyCyvsco. 

614, 7 fisys^et fisyag, M. confert Stein T., 51. 

46, 11 Ta fieysO^rj fisitovg ccov fisyCaTcovl 

623, 3 iv fisa(i) ndvcMv e^fOQMvcwv, cf. 207, 2. 591, 19 618 16 
669, 15! 298,11. - ' * 

800, 6 oi;x ig csXog cd ytyvofisva ndvca nsnvafisvoc. 

834, 13 dxfiaC(')Vcoov fidXiaca, Mfo. 

1013, 17 dXX' ovx d(f' ov KataaQ iSvvdacsvasv, ovx dQxrjv civa. ov 
acQucrjydv, ov^ vnacov, ov SrjfiaQxov ixstQocovrjaacs sct.^) 

267,20 dyavaxcstv sct inavaavTo, vHfd. Mrs., nisi sTt post 
fiaXXov suuni locum habet. 

905, 3 fidXXov ixQacovv. 

625, 15 sv&ovv xitcd SaCfiova, iibi pleonasmus non est nisi in vor- 
bonim forma, cf. locos 201, 7. 75, 7. 317, 9. 767, 7. 829, 8 cum locis 
79, 6. 76, 1. 200, 6. 270, 11 (Efm.) 736, 21. 768, 15. 1008, 3. - 

172, 14 OQydvcov noXXcov rjihi^Qovv, Mfm. 

1116, 22 xat ov nst&6fisvot, c6cs s^aXXov, cf. 



1) f:k idem est atque fi6vog 62, 16 Nifo et 157, 16; aliis locis ita premitur ut 
notionem ^6vog aequiperet, velut 196, 2. 212, 8, 17. 391, 13, 17. 562, 11. 585, 12; 
aliis ita non premitur, ut commutari possit cum ris, velut 343,4 Nfo. 567,6. 786, 12 
Mfo., cf 820,4 Mfd. eva, cui opponatur sequens toaom (cf. 852, 22. 353, 2. 354, 4, 20. 
355, 24.) 

2) cf. Kaelker p. 272. K. § 60l. 

3) cf. de inf. et de coll. verb. 

4) cf. de anticipatione et de anaphora. 



n 



;i 



— 46 — 

1047, 15 Tovg ds dTiccTTJaaq (Sdi aoi nccQeifxi, Cobfc. ods, cf. 692, 4^) 
(Mrs. contra Schw.)2) 

601, 13 ov d-aiitva TiQoiav', dll' avSov iv neQmdco) . . , XQW^^^^^^* 
Nfd. FvSov. 

140, 26 xaxona&ovvieg eg togovSs xaxov, Mrs. contra R. 

805, 15 Sf€e Tov fxri nenoXefir^xevai. 

1082, 9 vofitfKocsQav aQxijv naQav6i.iov, Mfd. ? 

488, 4 Tsleov xo SQyov i^^eTeUad^. Mfo., cf. 

1089, 6, 7 To Tslog BTeXevTa^) et 530, 27 ig ovdsv ^f§atov . . . 
TsXog shr^l^ev, Mfo. 

948, 11 iyeiQovTeg dno xov vnvov, Mfo. 

152, 18 ol S^ iv daTet '^Ponfxalot, Nfd. 

Jam restat locus 172, 1, de quo pauUo dicam accuratius: 

Schw.i igitur in verbis wg dv sg xvvrjYSTag offendit, quod, quam- 
quara verbum axevdCetv perapte coniungeretur cum praepositione ^'c (vehit 
972, 10, 19. 967, 12, cf. etiam 61, 16 et 201, 18) o5g dv ig vereretur ut 
ferri posset; proposuitque comparato loco 973, 12, ubi axevdCetv coni- 
unctum legitur cum ojg (cf. 860, 1. 330, 2) sequente accusativo — ceterum 
miror quod eodem loco idem Schw., II. p. 591, v. 26 adn., amplexus est 
ig (quod recepit M.) — scribendum esse ojo-am xwrjysTag; quatamen coniec- 
tura, quamvis lenem statueret corruptelam, veram corruptelam editor ille 
mihi non videtur investigasse. M. autem cum delet wg «V, violentius mihi 
videtur procedere. Corruptelam igitur latere ne ego quidem negaverim; neque 
enim facere possum, quin tal, quali turbetur sententia, hunc locum la- 
borare iudicem pleonasmo; praesertim cum ipsum dv sit pleonasmus quamvis 
tolerabilis. Nam recte ea quae traduntur interpretato alia mihi non videtur 
evadere sententia nisi haec: ,induti erant veste tali, ut venatores videri vide- 
rentur^ Puto autem, Appianum, si axevd^etv vocabulum constructione ab 
ipso usitata hoc quoque loco ita voluisset usurpare, ut cum personae quam 
dicimus accusativo coniunctum significaret „veste induta se in aliquem mutare* 
vel„vestemutataspeciem alicuiuspraebere^ dicturum fuisse aut sg xvvrjysTag 
iax, aut (og xvvrjysTag iax., quae cum dixisset, etiamsi omisisset vocabulum 
dv, nescio an fallendi notionem, quae hic requiritur, satis expressisset. Neutrum 

1) cf. de particula ©6e ad 14, 9 „de coniunctionibus.* 
_ 2) Ceterum nescio an locus 1069, 21 Ual t6 ixav iv m ^eitqi^ yEvifiBvov toi6vbe 

^r, THSTnXritiivoi, 6' inX vifiriaiv tote yr^g ig to ittbiov to "Agtiov vito \aitovb'riQ «^* vmthi 
avUovto) sanari possit coUocato totc post y^q, praesertim cum sequantur verba vno 
anovbis 6ti vvAtos, quae premuntur. 

3) cf. de fig. etymol. 



-f 



— 47 — 

autem quod scripsit, equidem suspicor, hoc loco omnino non agi de persona 
qiiadam sed de re. Puto enim in archetypo fuisse verba cog dv ig xwr^ysa^a 
iaxevaafisvovg (i. e. vestitos, quasi essent venatmi). Qua scriptura sen- 
tentiam sanari nemo non intellegit; ipsam autem quin tribuam Appiano, 
eo minus dubito, cum legamus 281, 11 ig fidxrjv iaxevaafisvot. 394, 25 
ig vavfxaxCav iaxevaafisvot, cf. 731, 1. 744, 2. 525, 21. 521, 1. 1147,' 17. 
Hiatus 1) autem si quem offenderit, sciat, hiatum ab Appiano per negle- 
gentiara nullo fere raodo vitari nisi per inconstantiam (quod centum paginas 
in solos hiatus observandos intento perlegenti niihi evasit) ; quod si verum 
non est, scribat xwijyeatav (xvvrjysata legimus 67, 1. 544, 17, 20. 699, 10. 
147, 27 et alia significatione 524, 23, xwr^yeata uno, ni fallor, loco, quem 
tamen memoria non teneo). 

18) De anacolutliia. 

Anacoluthiam A. quoque^) nonnumquam admisit; primura ita, ut ex 
obliqua oratione desiliret in orationera rectara, cf. 259, 21 «c Ss 
Ttg TMV ^ovXevTtav xovg ^Qsa^etg iJQeTO, onoog ovx iv dQxf] tov noXsfxov 
Tovg ahtovg, dXld fxSTa Ttjv r^aaav i^exTJQV^av, xat UQog ^fxag ov nQO- 
TeQov dUd vvv nQea^evead^e, ot fisv dnoy.Qiaewg rjjioQow. 

452, 20 oi) Xoywv stpri XQn^^f^^ oi'^s xQtaecog „dkX at^tg vfiag naQa- 
xaXovfxev'^., Stfc. x^/^'&/, Mrs. 

1112, 12 ixnoSccv Ss xdxetvrjg yevofxsvrjg, ovSevog vfxtv ivSetv sti 
sxpri ..nQog dXliqlovg nXrjv dXrj&evaat neQt wv vnevor^aaTe'' Mrs. contra B., 
qui c. ivSet; accedunt loci 379, 23. 392, 24. 885, 3. 965, 6. 1033, 10. 
1111, 3. 1070, 21. 

Contrarium praebet locus 1073, 11 c Ss dvTeSiSaaxev avTovg otl 
avTu. fxsv xat "'AvToavio) ndvTa etvat (pCha, cum 866, 13 mirara inveniamus 

orationum obliquae et rectae confusionem^): ^AvtoovCov xaTe^oa' ,,KaC' 

aaQt fxsv SC ifxs fxrJTS oQyCCead^at fXTJTe ivv^Qtteiv, eveQysTrj yeyevrj- 

fxsvo) • ifxot Ss TMV fxsv v^Qewv, ig oaov ^sletg, ifLKpoQSta&at, Trjv Ss Tfjg 

ovaCag dQnayrjv intaxetv, fXSXQt Tovg nolCTag sxetv' dQxsaetv ydQ 

Sfxot nevofxsvq) Trjv ts tov naTQog So^av, dv Stafxsvrj, xat Trjv tov Srjfiov 
Stavsfxriaiv, idv idarjg So^fjvat.'' 

Deinde haud raro una cura subiecti rautatione hypotaxin inter- 
rurapit vel continuat parataxi: cf. 592, 10 xa^eUe t6 ^saTQov, ov 
Aevxtog Kdaatog ^qxto xat '^Srj nov Tslog ikdfx^avevy wg xai ToSe aTaaewv 

1) cf. Kaelker et Hu. 

2) de Polybio cf. Kaelker p. 272. 

3) cf. de inf. 



t 



•0 



li 



— 48 — 

aQ%9VBv fQMV. 440,12 — 16 ov ini^ovXevo^evov vno ^eXevxov tov avexpiov 
ot fASv 2v(}0t vojiuCot^(Tf neQKT(od-fjvfxi dc evah^eiav, xai Sia vovco evae^ij 
jiaQMVofnaaav {tvaiQct (V avzov ^(SonGev, SQaaO^eicra voT xciX^ovg) SfJLol de 
doxovatv eni yfXcdii avtco noii^aaad-cu. to ovofia ol ^VQf)t. 

274, 9 orav . . . dvaf.uiivriaxr^ai)^e rov nXr^*hovc, mv 61';^^ rf vemv xal 
Xa f VQoiv oaoyv HpeQeve xtd sg oiovg ye covg kif.uvag xarriyea^e aofiaQol 
xal Tft veo)Qia xal za tcov axevoov Tafuela evenifinlaTe, Rfc. ic vel oiu 
hen., quales loci extant 15, e qnibiis 6 Mafo. 

Lociis837, 22 — 838, 2exhibetcontrarinm: taeX&fxw . . . xalnlewv 

ejiLVoovvTa 8r^ tovtov ^iaieiiiaat Titv noTafiov xal inl tovto sxnXiovTtt 
(faaiv entcoi&dafu. 

Meram autem parenthesin praebent loci 22, 15. 250, 20. 1061, 2. 

Tum extant loci, quibus mirum in modum casuum mutet re- 
lationem: 

643, 12 od-ev avcov o 2v}.X«g FTt vetuTaTov ovca fiyev fv TifiTjj 
xal entovcog, (paaiv, vnaviacccTo fwvff), ubi exspectamus intovct, et 751, 6 
nQoSi(f)xrjvco xat oSot xat Xifiiveg xal (fQOVQia ^wc fx Te yfjg det ifi^Qsa- 
0-at xai Std d^aldaatjg ndvTa dvefiov avTfo (fiQeiv, ubi idem vocabulum 
ndvTcc pro subiecto pertinet ad (fiQead-at, ad qiQetv pro obiecto. Nfd. 
dvefiov et (fiQeiv. 

Jam attractione^) quadam nititur anacoluthia 111, 11 Tovg 
fiev dXXovg ixeXevaev .... SiatQeO-Bvvag . . (fevyetv ... ig ToifioXftv nt/Xtv, 
bvd-a avTov neQtfiivetv, '^tXiovg Ss fiovovg tntXe^dfievog exiXevaev avTi») 
avviacaaO^at; nbi ne conieceris xai ivcaid^a aut simile quidquam; tvd^a 
avTov neQifiiveiv enim attractione quadam dependet, iam non a priore 
ixeXevae, sed ab insequente. — Item 907, 12 dXXa 8e ""Avcoaviov TfXrj 
xaXovvTog ix T(t)v dXXcov aTQaconeScov cov ^QaSecog wc iv at^fViSim Te 
fiBTaxXriaet xai fiaxQf)^ev Iovtoov ixQaToi^v ot tov KaiaaQog Tfj fidxjfj, ubi 
(bv post aTQaTonsSoov noli delere aut mutare in xai covtoov. — Eodem 
pertinet 983, 21 xai SoiSexa teXri aTQaTov rato) KaiaaQt Ix noXXov aTQa- 
Tevf)fxeva xai yeyvf^tvaafiiva nQoaeXafiev dO-Qooog' ov to fxev sv avTcov o 
KataaQ iv 2vQia xaceXeXoinet, ubi Mf. probat Schw. coniecturam ov mu- 
tantis in xai; quibus tribus locis relativum habemus pro demonstrativo, 
quae structura nescio an sit deprompta e sermone Latino. ^) 

Anacoluthiam vero satis duram exhibet locus 319, 13 — 21 Xfyecat 
fiBv SaxQvaat .... vnBQ noXefiicov ... xai avvtScov OTt xai noXetg 



1) cf. K. § 602, 7. 

2) cf. de acc. absol. 



r 



y 



— 49 — 

Set fieTa^aXetv coaneQ dvB-Qconovg Saifiova, xai tovt snad-e iq 

MaxeSovcov, eoTe sxcov etTe nQocfvyovTog avTov TovSe vov snovg ,^saa€Tat 
rifiaQ IlQtdfioto,^' Rfc. sxoov S(frjy Mrs. ^) 

Quo accedunt loci 906, 21 — 907, 2 yvcofirj Ss ^v ^AvTwvi^p /i^ 

inix^tQStv . . firjS' dfivvead^ca, Std Ss tcov tnnscov , . . . ivoy^Xetv, fxsxQt na- 
QaSoiri . . . ., iQTi^M) Ss xai KaiaaQt Std tovto fidXtaTa r^v fid^rjv ineiyea- 
S-at, ubi yvcofxri significat et consilium et sententiam. 

434, 24 ^AQyog To iv ^OQeaveia .... xai t6 iv ^oviq) Xeyofievov ot- 
xiaat JtofiTJSriv dXcofievov, ubi exspectamus ^xiad-at vno JtofiijSovg dXo)- 
fisvov, Schwfc. o Xsyovatv. 

1116, 9 et . . . . ig ISiovg i^S-Qovg vnSQ otxeiag Svvaaceiag, vnSQ ^g 
S'^ xai uQoyQacfdg xai a^paydg xai XtfJLov ix TcovSe (— xai i^ wv) navco- 
Svvov yeyovsvat, su xai Ta Xotnd neQtSvotev avToilg, Mfo. 

1181, 17 etai S^ ot TlXdyxov, ovx ^AvTcovtov XsyovTSg imaTelXat xai 
vofii^ovatv aQy^ovTa 2vQiag xai Tatg intaToXatg intTeTQafifisvov ig %a 
ineiyovTa intyQd(f€tv tov ^AvTcovtov xai rf^ a(fQaytSt xQ^(^Sat, ubi M. Bfd. 
xai vofutovatv; post 2vQiag supplendum est ovTa et xai ante Tatg intelle- 
gendum est ^etiam**. sntTeTQafifisvov autem dependet a vofii^ovat, quare 
Schwrv. „cui nimirum, Syriae praefecto, commissum putant ab Antonio 
ut ^* 

cf. 398, 5-12. 205, 9. 239, 21. 

Ceterum anacoluthiam exhibent nonnulla quoque exempla ex eis, quae 
protuli cum egi de figura xaTa avveatv et de nominativo. 

1) cf. de ellipsi. 



H 



\\ 






III. 
19) De adverbiis. 

Adverbia nonnusquam extant pro adiectivis et vice versa 
adiectiva pro adverbiis; alterum inveni 8 locis, quibus Mafo , alterum 15, 
e quibus 8 Mafo.; exscribendo inter se comparasse satis habeo locos 
693, 19 oi' Sv(Tx€Qwg exQacriaev avSQog ifinXTJxvcog aUoxorov SQyov inl 
vovv Xa^oviog t€ xal eg neiQav hi Sfiu^xroreQov dnaQaaxev w g tiqo- 
ayayoviog et 1073, 14 ot acQaxevofxevoi zag dnoixiag exovai ^e^aCovc. 

Imprimis nQozeQog modo pro adiectivo legimus (700, 14. 600, 11 
cet.), modo pro adverbio (82, 4 et 879, 6 Mfo. 234, 19 Mrs. contra St.); 
item fiovog, in quo adiectivo Mfo. 772, 19, Nfo. 1017, 19, adverbio 
454, 17 Schw. Nfo.; in nQwzog denique adiectivo Mfo. 831, 22, adverbio 
436, 26. 

Jam hoc commemorem, non deesse locos, ubi adverbia, in quibus 
insitnotiomotionis, coniuncta sint cum verbis, quae significent 
statum quietisi), cf. 110, 6 avvewae Wc Xomovg ^g n xcoQrov, ol 
xtvSvvevetv . . exQfiv. 966, 20 ^ S' onot y^g iailv 6 dvyQ intyvovaa^); 
quales loci extant 11, e quibus 7 Mafo. 

Sed usu venit etiam contrarium, quod legi 10 locis, e quibus 7 
Mafo.; cf. 382, 23 /xrjSafAov nQottoatv. 32, 8 i^fjLelg del 'Pwfiuiotg ianev 
Sofied-a (ftXtav. 

Quam confusionem respiciens ne loco quidem 521, 18 (xal StFqev- 
yov wg ix neStov ndvvo&ev dxoaficog) dubitaverin?, ndvcod^ev, quod tra- 
ditum est, defendere a M., qui conicit ndvvoae (cf. 712, 24); idem cadit 
m loeum 313, 4 {neQtnffiipag ovv iceQw&ev hsQovg, R. Mfm). 

De singulis adverbiis haec observavi; £v,IA« semper ubi significat 
(etiam 111, 11 3)) ibi nusquam nisi forte ab initio enuntiationum (73, 20. 

1) cf. de praep. 

2) cf. K. p. 384, 3. 
8) cf. de anacoL 



r 



- 51 - 

432, 15. 481, 19. 559, 14. 887, 19 cet.) cum hvrav^a saepissime usu 
veniat; causalem notionem exhibet svd^a 1131, 24 ovx ev^ovlov etvat 
cfi QtipoxMvvov, evd^a avfifiaxCav dXXr^v nQoaSoxar/]; quae saepius inest 
etiam in o^ev, velut 594, 9 yevofisvrjg iv ixxXr^aia ^Qovcrjg, odev ov 
'/Pfitg iact 'Pcofxatotg ovSev sct xvqovv. 930, 17 fxaxQocsQav bSov . . . 
inevoet cov ce^^Pfjvov neQdaat xal xd dyQtOiceQa rwv ^aQ^dQwv vneQeXx^etv. 
oS^ev atnov vno xe xf^g dnoQvag xal vov xafxdTov nQoicot fiev ot veo- 
avQdcevcot xavahnovveg ig KaCaaQa bX(*iQovVy quales locos nuraeravi 11 
(bis Mfo.); et in onov 597, 19 ovSsva svt (^(pelovarjg ovve ilevSeQCag 
orce .... dQxfjgy onov xal ri t(ov SrjfidQyoov . . . cotdSe v^Qt^e^). onov fisv 
— onov Ss extat 193, 12, 13, 6vs fisv — ovs Ss 166, 6, 7 (cf. 251, 13). 
ig va ficxhava pro ^c vd fisytara legimus 866, 9 (Mfo.) 869, 26 
(cf. 949, 20. 866, 21), iv xtvSvvct) fxdhaca cov pro iv xtvSvvcp fieyCaT^i) 
cov 1154, 7 Mfo.2). Saepissime autem fidhaca significat fere, circiter 
(906. 4. 990, 3 cei), praecipue in numeris (560, 26 cet.). 

20) De negationibus. 

Enegationum quoque usu Appianeo apparet sermonis posterioris 
neglegentia et libertas, imprimis e pLrticularuni /ti} et ov com- 
mutatione, quam non tam hiatus vitandi studio attribuerim quam ne- 
glegentiae ^). 

Legimus igitur firi pro ov 208, 15 {6 fisv Srj firj jieCd^cov sScoxs 
Ttvt c() ;f^r(T/'oi^) septem aliis locis, ov pro firi 393, 23 {ovx ilnCaag dv 
Ttva nSQt nQoSoaCag intacokriv avTOyQa^fov ovx dXr^d^evovca nsfiiliaty 
Nfc. fxfi d^r'Kl ovSetg pro firjSetg 961, 4, firjSelg pro ovSetg 176, 24, 25. 
331, 23. 1060, 23, fxrjSs pro ovSs 686, 2. 

fxr^Ss pro fi^ legimus 1066, 23 et 1070, 9 (quibus locis Mfo.), 
ovSs pro ovx 796, 8. 758, 2. 811, 12 (quibus Mafo.)*), fir) pro fxr^ or 

183, 21. 

Non minore libertate utitur A. in abundantia illa negationlim, 
quam modo admittit (242, 3 iy(o S' oi>x iQco fisv ovSsv. 29, 16 fir) Setv 
fxrjSs iTQea^evetv 659, 21 ovSs (fcovr^v su oi^Sev()g . . . sxovvog 1013, 17^) 
multis aliis) modo non admittit (246, 8 ov fxsvvot xat v6v vov StxaCov 



1) cf. K. p. 963. 

2) De tv tmc, fiahoTa cf. de grad. comp. 

3) cf. K. § 513, p. 747. 

4) cf. de particulis. 

5) cf de aDticipatione et K. II. p. 760, 2. 



!!' 



I 



— 52 — 

Xoyiaiiiv &v rzsgt^vyoifit, Mfc, odSs vdv. 364, 6 ovrs 'onriQov ovts aXko 
n slAij,f>s<rav, Schwfc. SUo odSh slL, 541, 10 ?dos ycig oddsv ^v 
ofioiov, il TfXuaaa, Nfc. ovSs ^ y>l6Tcr<ra '), cf. 393, 22 454 16 855 27 
661,20. 102,15. 620,8. 619,5. 893,14. 555,22). 812,3 848 2 
855,27). j , . o,^. 

Mentione denique dignus est locus 499, 27 vH ts ^ovlf, nsgl 
ndvKov iniatsXi^v, oi^ V7tox(>tvcfisvog iipi]<fia&ai noiffiwg (cf. 489, 22 
et p. 640), ubi vnoxQivofisvog non dissimulans, quod aliquis putaverit 
significat, sed simulans, ut omnino apud A.^); negatio enim oi!x perti- 
net ad ipg^ia&at, cf 595, 21 o,'x ^^aaxov aitotg sasa!>at r^r yiiv. 
596, 5 ovx e(prj Si' §avt6v idasiv . . . alios locos *). 

Neque tamen cum M. mutaverim locum 1071, 16, ubi extant verba 
vofi^ovtsg ovx sivat pro ov vofti^ovtsg sivai. 

21) De praepositionibus. 

De singulis praepositionibus agere ut mihi in animo non est, ita 
adnotanda mihi sunt duo potissimum, quae spectent ad usum universum 

Primum igitur idem, quod in adverbiis, hic invenitur: ut prae- 
positiones, quae signiflcent motionem, a verbis, quae quietem 
significent,^dependeant; quod partim cadit in femporis notiones'*), 
"^- ^^^' ^^ *9"? Siaxprj^mv 7iQo»i^astv ig trjv smovaav^) hsqC ts toC 

1) cf. de particulis. 

*) cf. de genere. 

*) cf. de patticnla xot. 

<) cf. Kr. § 67, 1, 2. 

Krebs. p fo8^2 ^ ^''' ^' '*" ^"''' ^' '"" ^*"'" ^'' ^ ^*'' *' ^' ^ '^- *^'"- "^' ^' P" ^^»" 

«-1. * '^ ^ T' f- r** '""'' "'^*"' ^'^"'' "^"^'^' '"^i-^i^"^ «t •<"=»"> P'"'lo »te. 
cedentem 576, 9, ubi fien non potest, quin suppleto post ^moioav vocabulo i^ifav 

ay„^v coniungamus cum ivi»eto (cf. 579, 17. 887, 21), etiamsi lacunam cum N sta- 
tuamus (Schwry. .comitia in sequentem diem distulif), et usum vocabuli i^av, quod 
V;,"'^ °° ^'"'"'sdam modo ponit (887, 15. 1044, 1. 1180, 5. 1085. 20 76 22 

,oLt ^l'^' ^ ***-^ ""^" "'"'**'* (^**-*' 5- 831. 11. 825, 25. 887, 21. 888, 22. "«Oe' 2o' 
.099. 19. 1168, 17. 80, 22. 205, 19. 222. 26 cet.). Neque vero bene proc^dit narrlti!; 
s. ayop«, V. 21 eignificat locum comitiorum (cf. 4 r,l fiovXevrri^^ov v. 19), v. 22, ino- 
tete repetitum, ipsa comitia. Irrepsit autem e v. 2 1, male iteratum. - Ceterum vocabulum 
H vel x^ofa A. omittere solet non solnm in universum, velut 68, 11 (Mrd ). 181 14 181 21 
85, 19. 539, 5 (Mfo.) 575, 12 (Mrd., iure enim postular^mns ,,>, si qJid ollo 

m V -Tn ^ ""'''''' ''' '' "> '"''^^ '^' --^''-^^) 934, 12 (Mfo.), sed 
etiam ubi inteUegutur certa quaedam terra vel urbs: 58, 23 sc. ^.^t,'^., Schwfo. 184, 22 

I^' :: K 'i, t :Ly ' "• '^'"^ ^^- '' '' ™- '''^ '' - ^^'^ -'^- Schwfo., 



> 



— 53 - 

vofiov xal Trjg ^Qx^g; explicatur partim attractione quadam, maximam 
partem scriptoris neglegentia, quod concedet, quicumque coiisideraverit 
usu vemre etiam contrarium, ut in adverbiis. Loci autem iUuc per- 
tment 37, e quibus 14 Mafo.; cf. etiam 937, 4 el fj,rj mSwg avrovg . . . 
eTTTJlmCe, TteQifieimvvag, ig ew ra dx^ifiearava (ladeTv, ubi ig ^to per- 
tmet ad fta^elv. 827, 7 xal fieva ^ofig xat nofinrjg int r« ^fi^ola ngov- 
Te&ri, Mr. confert 671, 11. - Loco 617, 13, ubi legimus ^&ovg 6e xQo- 
vtov Tovg T6xovg fiefiacovwog, oc fiev xaxa vo ed-og fjrovv, oi Se olov 
ix noUfiiov xe xai oedcrewv dve^dUovvo xdg dnoSoaeig, post axdaeiov 
equidem suppleverim ovieg. — 

Idem deprehendimus in attributo tribus locis: 483, 14 ai^axidv 
(J' ofnog dXlriv dno twv vn ainov iO^vcov dndvtatv .... avvekeYev 
(cf. 173, 15) 607, 1 xal Tovg e"^ ai^rcSv — SC. tiSv noXeoav — alxfiali^vovg 
ve xal SovXovg iav(jdvevaev. 232, 5^). 

Contrariuni exhibent loci 33, 19 Sval S6(jaacv ig triv y^v ifine- 
nriplaiv imxd^ocov dUo int^eig, iUnefine 'Poofiamv exaaiov vno Tovuit 
Mfc. vovTo, 5^2, 23 ini t7]v ig 'Pwfirjv avdatv inety6f,evog. 680, 22. 
933, 5 (quibus Mfo.) 846, 3. 

Altero loco mihi est commemorandum , valde amare Appianum 
verba simplicia^), cf. 258, 15 Uefixpev pro hitnefjLipev, 555, 13 x''^ut 
avdSta Tijg rifieQag . . . SQafielv, Mfc. SLaSQafielv, quales locos inveni 87, 
e quibus 83 Mafo. Neque tamen non extant loci, quibus composita le- 
gamus, exspectemus simplicia 29, e quibus 20 Mafo., cf. 542, 18 evriyyva 
WOriYyva. 772, 1 avyyvwfxriv ineStSov pro a. iSiSov. 936, 22. 1003, 11. 
353, 24. 593, 19 (cf 697, 21). 338, 2 cet. 

Qualis inconstantia apparet etiam e locis 27, 11 (cf. 1072, 8), ubi 
extet alviav (peQeiv, et 413, 15 (cf. 302, 8). 1115, 20, ubi extet ahiav 
dvaifeQecv (cum 1094, 14 legaraus ahiav fxecaipeQeiv) inter se comparatis. 
Quod cum ita sit, ne in eis quidem offendendum est locis, quibus 
praeter praepositionem cum nomine coniunctam seu eandem seu aliam 
praepositionem inusitatius et abundantius cum verbo invenimus composi- 
tam, quod 27 locis observavi, e quibus 14 Mafo.; cf. 232, 15 SvvriS^evviov 
'avv avv^ avvavvaai vov SQ^fiov. 465, 9 jivevfia Kavvixov ifineaov ig 
aVTag — SC. Tag blxdSag — ig 'PoSov naQTJvevxe^ 584, 14 xai voSe, 
ov TrjUxovTov, ola naQeQyov ini Tf] rQdx^ov avdaei avveneaev, ubi verba 

1) cf. de articulo. 

2) cf. Sch. p. 174. 

3) cf. de ellipsi. 



U 



I 



1 ^ i 



i 



— 54 — 

sni T^ atdoei non pertinent ad avvmeaev, quod idem est atque ^accidif % 
sed ad ndQegyov) cet., quos locos cum respicio, nescio an falso 570, 7 
deleverim in^). 

Eadem cum varietate, inconstantia , neglegentia A. utitur singulis 
praepositionibus; quas cum hic mihi tractandas esse non proposuerim, hoc 
tamen commemorem, saepissime extare comnuitationem praepositionum et 
per se positarum et in verbis compositis sive Appiano sive librariis 
attribuendam; nam pro locorum numero et ratione et pro volurainum 
Appianeorum amplitudine utrumque vereor ne possit statui. 

22) De eoniunctionibns. 

De coniunctionibus particulisque quae proferrem, digna niihi visa 
sunt haec: 

In usu particulae xai abundantiam quandani ostendit A., quae 
quod homines doctos videtur fugisse, eo magis miror, cum lioc omnibus 
fere recentioribus Graecis sit commune; loci autem huc pertinent permulti. 

Ac primum quidem xai nonnusquam bis ponit ita ut alterum altero 
augeatur, cf. 109, 3 xai tcvmv nQta^evof^Uv(^v k avziv xai d^eUviMv 
^e^aiovv xai oaa "ArUio) . . . avvO^fpevot, naQe^e^rjxtaai', Mfd.; 396, 15 
eveSQeviav xai deC xi xai evox^tiov, Schwrm.; 25, 11 xai duTJvrr^aev aviG, 
xai foSe ov noU vaxeQov, Mfd. , Hilberg fc. xai avuh\ quales loci ex- 
tant 29, e quibus 8 Mafo., cum r. addiderit locum 972,^1, xai desiderans 
post elQTiviiq', quo, si recte conicio, accedit locus 205, 1, ubi verba vnoxQi- 
vaa^aC xe Maaaavdaarjv xai eg qiXCav vnayayCa^ai ferri nou possunt; 
significant enim, quod recte animadvertit Schw." .Massinissae personam' 
induere^ quae vis ut semel, 956,21, inest in vocabulo vnoxQCvaa^ai, 
ita hoc loco non quadrat. Ceterum tribus praeterea significationibus A. 
utitur verbo vnoxQCveaO^ai: prima respondeiidi 48, 8 (Schwrm.?) 340, 17 
(Mrm.?), altera causandi 922, 6. 344, 14; tertia et ea creberrima simu- 
landi^) (47 locis, e quibus 5 absolute, 3 cum accusativo); quae significatio 
loco 205 , 1 quoque sine dubio requiritur. Schw. auteni et eum° secutus 

1) cf. de verb. signif. 

2) cf. de dat. 

3) Loco 465, 4, quocum rem spectanti comparandi sunt loci 484, 25 et 485, 6 
nisus lectione Candidi qni tum addidit e Latino sermone - inter ovdh et iTto- 
%QLvin8vog inseruerim Ibnv, quod pro scripturae similitudine post oiUv facile potuit 
intercidere, faciUus certe quam , quo Mu. explevit lacunam , q,i>ovriUiv. Nauckii vero 
matatlo a traditis verbis longius recedit. 



— 55 — 

M. quod scripserunt ^noxQCvaa^aC xe xai M. ig ^pdCav imayayea^at 
sanarunt illi quidem locum, sed ita, ut equidem desiderem aliquid et elel 
gantiae et sententiae. Multum enim interest inter Carthaginiensium illam 
simulationem et Massinissae amicitiam. Ego certe, si verba scriptoris non 
legissem nisi ad vocabula imoxQCvaa^aC ve (quae idem sunt atque ^noxQt- 
vafisvovg), iion tam amicitiam ((puCav) futuram esse exspectarem quam 
ipsam pacem (^avxCav vel elQTJvriv). Quo cum accedat quod facilius, ni 
fallor, ante Maaa. potuit intercidere vocabulum xal, quam ut commuta- 
rentur inter se xai et Maaaavdaar^v, equidem inter ze et Maaa. inseruerim 
alterum vocabulum xaC, respiciens cumulationem illam supra exemplis fir- 
matam (quae ipsa pagina 205 recurrit v. 16). 

Deiiide etiam non admissa cumulatione A. xal particula saepius ita 
usus est, ut prorsus superflua videatur esse, nisi quod nonnunquam verti 
potest per ^ipse" aut commutari cum Srj vel neQ, cf. 242, 25 Si avzd 
fiCvuoi xai vovTo ndlXov tTi (feiSovg d^Ca. 621, 10 xai tovto . . . elnii^v 
tni]yyeUev o>a>g, el d^eloiev . . . avvayayeiv, xai nQd^etv o, w dv fiov- 
XevofiCvoig Soxfi. 369, 5 pfirjQd Te Sovveg enxaxoaCovg nalSag, ovg xai h 
KaiaaQ rJTei; quales locos legi 23, e quibus 15 Mafo. 

Ne videtur quidem superflua esse 884, 23 Toi KaCaaQi S' b aTQatog 
neXhxeag ,\ . . nQoauyay^vceg, rfiCovv eavvov dvuaTQdvriyov dnocfijvai 
nolepov Te r^yefxovevovTa xai aqtav dei vn aQxovai, Tax^evvoiv, ubi 
Mfd. xai, Schwr. commate posito post dnogfjvat, non posito post fiyefno- 
vevovTa, vertit „ut propraetorem se ipse renuntiaret atque eo titulo et 
bellum administraret et ipsos duceret, adsuetos parere magistratibus". 
963, 18 6 Se jioUg sg IixeXCav />, yeuovevovaav r/;^ lcaXCag, xai 
nofinrjCov a^ag nQo^vfiM^ vnoSexofiCvov, Mfo. in xai, participia causaiii 
continent, cf. 1006, 11. - 1029, 22 ^yev .... atSrJQia (fCQ^ov xai xXCfia^ 
xag, wg e^eXaiv avTO — SC. tc SiaTeCxiafia — xai naQoSevacov eg t6 
Tov KaaaCov avQavoneSov, Mfd. xai, Cv. Latine magis quam verbo tenus 
«quasi eftVacto vallo in castra eius irrupturus% cf. 1131, 23 d S" ovx 
sneCd^eTo, KaXsCatov neQifievcov, xai XCymv ovx ev^ovXov elvai to Qiipo- 
xCvSvvov, Mfd. xai. 

Saepissime porro xai significat etiam vel adeo'), cf. 336, BUqO^C- 
TavQov S' ev"lUvQioig SvvdaTrjv xai txTetvev emfiovkevaag , Schw. Mrm. 
Nld.) 494, 5 eaevCyx,] Se xai Trjv Sandvrjv TovSe tov nokCfxov. lAl, 11 
KaCaaQog S' avvovg neQt&eovTog Te xal avv oveCSet fiaxQav hi tov 
Tlofiniqtov ovTa emSetxvvovTog, xai etfOQcovTog to. arjfieta dneQQinTovv, 

1) cf. Kaelker p. 286, b. 



\ 



i 



'n\ 



i !)• 



,1 



— 56 — 

Schwfm >). Mu. Roscher fc, Sch. f. probat Roscheri coniectnram; xai enim 
significat vel, quod recte statuit M.3; idem .ectc dixit, avro^i nou inse- 
rendo, sed intellegendo esse supplendum; cf. 367, 14. — 767, 17 Ke(>xvoag 
tisv xttl v6ts xal At^vTjg vneaetSev, Mufd. 824, 2 et 1073 22 Nfn '• 
cf. etiam 1094, 6. . , ^^ «lo , 

Kal cum tao?, ofioios etc. coniunctum invenimus 586, 15 {rovg Se 
fiovXeviag taa xal {mrjxoovg ino(ei) 665, 10. 600, 4 (cf Soph R 
1 187); pro xarrteg cum participiis 676, 3 (./?«(,„*,,>, « ^al m''«W«c 
riv xat vavt' inna,»a^6^vog ig tijv SXa,,ov fnA zoSv noXe^tmv. 

bchwv. ,neque ipsorum hostium cavillationes curabat") 875, 7 (Sv 

ey» xal»eaatTeQov etS^g ^v KeXtixriv difjiQovfitjv, Schwfv. ,audaciorem 
leiiquis ; post^p«(riiW4.«r equidem suppleverim nou oVr«, sed Sv, cf. 875, 13) 
699, 19. 718,22. 883,22. 948,26. 1161,18, pro i^ 46, 17. 521, 19. 936,5 

noXtg denique cum adiectivo, quo pertinet, modo coniungitur par- 
ticula xat modo non coniungitur, cf 267, 23 leyowec olxrgA xal noUa, 
Schrs. contra vH. 371, 7 noXX^ xal i^eydXa V<r«.. 978, 22 noXXd xal 
aXXa naQahnovvt. 1181, 7 uQia.ovg re xal noXXovg. 767, 8 noXXd xai 
A^Hnea (ct. 183, 8 dniacf xal xanjyoeo,- 945, 3 e^v SvvacmidTfiv xai 
ToaovTo.v e9vaiv . . . ^ye^tovCSa, Mfo. 965, 9 MtaadXag S§ inmavr)g xal 
veog eg Bqovtov tifvye, Cob. Mfo.); non coniungitur 206,20 xal noXXd 
Setva naaxovatv, Mrs. contra Schw. 521, 15 Tond^ovaa noXXd dTon^- 
i€Qaj Mfo. 

In re quoque particula utenda neglegentiam quandam et incon- 
stantiam prodit^ A.; modo enim prorsus superflue eam videtur ponere, 
Cl. dyi, U atd^ ^g ^,a\ ovv xaTacf(,ov7Jaee x^rgag te atSriQag in.^aXov, 
xai (fvveaTTixorwv t^v axafpwv 6 ^yiov ^v ^mu(f ev yfj, 957 4 rj ve 
xofirj vov dovaxog aaXev^elaa evecprive tov O^^agov. xaf Xri^^ek neyev 
etvat hjacric. quales loci extant 13, e quibus 11 Mafo., modo ita omittit ^) 
ut eam desideremus, quod inveni 22 locis, e quibus 18 Mafo • cf. 644 ' 7 
Paev,a,jj ^al d^avel h^ga. 810, 19 ^eaaatievot ^' a^T^v Tcveg rL> 
adexaaTiov xal t^v eaTgarevfieva^v .... ^fiaXXov. 234, 6 olr6 xrjgvxelov 
vifniXov eaTriaav ini r% m^^Qag xal vag xecQac cogeyov, cet. 

Neque tamen utrumque rarius usu venit, quam ut tradita verba 
smgulis locis hceat retinere. Falso certe ve desideravit Mu: 708, 19 ubi 
voaelv non ab eS6xee dependeat, sed ab ^Q^af^eva (cf. 12, 21). Magnopere 
yero pnmo obtutu offendit Te xal 1030, 16 (?aU6fiev6g Te xal xaXen^c) 
quod tamen recurrit 1156, 15. ^ '^) 

1) cf. de ellipsi. 

2) cf. Kaelker p. 287. 



- 67 — 

Non magis mutandi sunt loci, quibus re, ab initio positum, usum non 
respicienti videatur esse mutandum in $e, cf. 172, 2 xdngov Te atjToTg 
ent ^vlwv eml^elg fjxe vvxrog eni cdg nvXag. 

137, 22 ovc(o fih 6 2xtnmv 68e nQooTog, ihg epoi doxel, neqteTeixiae 

nohv ov ifvyofiaxovaav . t6v Te A6q,ov noTafxov , ^ev^at (lev odx 

edvvaTo, Mrs. contra Schw., cf. Schw.^ p. 321. - 453, 20 d fih , . . t<fe(je. 

^Werarf d Se . , . . efiXanTev, /jQwvceg vneQetSeie . iftXiav re xai 

avfiiiaxtav ^filv nQOifiQovatv dnexQtvaa^e, Nfc. Se, cet. cet. 

Omnino cum multas tum has particulas videtur inter se confundere 
A., quare ne locis quidem 1, 12 et 1171, 23 Se cum M. mutandum esse 
m Te pro certo affirmaverim. 

Locis denique 829, 10 {rotdSe elm^v Trjv ea^rJTa . . . dveavQavo, xai 

ueQtCwadfxevog to Xf-xog . . ^ neQteacrj, xavaxvnT(ov re kg a^no xai 

''^fn^'^ vfivet, Mfc. xai xaraxvnTcov ye) 77, 16. 560, 24. 1040, 8 

aliis xai exspectamus, legimus re (cf. 671, 17 Mrc?) 

Haec habui quae proferrem de particulis xai et d ^). Sed priusquam 
pei-gam, hoc adiungam, loco 646, 9-1 1 (fxfjxog S' av\ov - sc. tov nohfiov - , 
Std ze t6 fieye^og t^Zv eQyow, aiv enet^et djg en e^^Qovg iStovg caxv- 
v6vvwv, od noXv (og ini ToaotaSe tQyoig eyevevo) Schw. et M. ita mihi 
videri recte offendisse in Te et in I^Qyotg et in asyndeto, ut eas offensiones 
simphcissime censeam deleri deletis verbis Std ye t6 fi,ye^og z(ov eQy^v, 
quae nescio an adscripta fuerint aut ad interpretanda verba djg ini ToaolaSe 
eQyotg aut pro varia horum lectione. 

Particula ^' disiunctiva ^) pro xai legitur non solum in enuntiatis 
negativis (541, 10 Nfm. ^) 1050, 15 Mfm., cf. 624, 7. 482, 2. 398, 17. 
823, 19. 855, 27. 1055, 2), sed etiam alibi saepius, cf. 25, 23 xai calg 
Srifioxontatg inatQ^fievog efiovXevaev ^Srj xQeoov dnoxon;dg xotvdg, rj tov 
Sfifiov rj^tov votg Savetaaatv dnoSovvat. 635, 23 ig 6ipetg hQenovco d&e- 
fitacovg, xctvvvvceg ce dvrjXecog xai neQtctpvovceg avxivag dvSQwv fiSrj 
ceS^ve(^C(ov , xai nQoct&evceg cdg ovfKpoQag ig (f6fiov fj xacdnXrjltv ij 
O^Fav dd^etitacov, Schfc. xai. 974, 12 2tcctog fih S^ nQioTog fj fx6vog 
dvSQ(ov oSe.. i(pvyaSeveT(j, vHfc. xai. 1066, 15 oT ce veot xai yeQovceg 
fj al yvvatxeg, Schwv. «muHeresque^ quales loci extant 19, e quibus 10 
Mafo.^ - Ceterum 567, 20, ubi legimus Toa^jvTov ^v aQa Totg 6Q(oatv m 
^^g ^mg c cvTov Seog, fj Tf^g duo&eaecog xacdnXrj^tg, fj tcSv ev&vvoov Tfjg 

1) cf. K. II. p. 787, 3. Kaelker p. 286. 

2) cf. de coll. verb. 

3) cf. Kr. § 69. 

4) cf. de neg. 



\ 



<M 



I 



■■ ( 



, ■/ 



— 58 — 

inayyeXuxg aiS,^c, ," rlX^ <pdav»e^nra , ^al XoYcrr^d? gnl cvfiu.eoovxi 
np> TvgavvCSa yevsa^a,,, Nfc. >cai vel i^ ^al Xoy., Siog enim et ^atcinXrfin 
et aid,og et ^dav»Qa>ma sunt varia sensus genera, h.riaftoi autem per- 
tinet ad mentem. Neque enim pro vocabuli aXXri (quod non vertentes 
optime vertamus) significatione illa ') dubitandum est, quin, si »" Xoytaaoc 
scnpsisset A., legeremus rf ^iXav»Qmma ^ aXXog Xoyca,irig. ~ 

Quo accedit locus 14, 8, ab hominibus doctis satis vexatus; de quo 
qind ludicem, data occasione iam proferam. Vaticani igitur scripturam 
a>Se fifv eg movg 'ir^aata cAv i»v&v rj aTQatr,yAv vd ifi^vXca St/Qtjvac 
quod emendavit ScbwJ (p. 133) ita ut ,sententia et ratio grammatica 
flag.tabant% cum scripsit e.aara ^«5. i^r<ov rj i, avQavriyovc za if,c.vha, 
Sir^Qrjcai, M.2 contra eam emendatiouem his verbis disputavit: ,at vero 
nec ri hic locum habet - ,cai enim necessario requiritur» (quod vertendo 
sigmhcavit Schw.) - ,nec articulus abesse potest sicut recte paulo ante 
cap 14" (quo ipso loco Schw. nisus est ad commendandam praepositionem 
H^, .scriptum est: (r« ificfvXia) ig rovg atQa,>]yovg cov acaaeu>v ,?/,- 
VQrjcai.' Quibus disputatis M.^ ipse proposuit recipiendum esse xai ig vovc 

acQairjyovg ca iftcpvXca. 

Quam coniecturam ne ipsam quidera ego probaverim; puto enim 
huuc locum omnino non iUo mendo, quod investigasse sibi visi sunt ho- 
mmes docti laborare, sed servata Vaticani scriptura eicienda esse verba ta 

Ac primum quidem ideo mihi non placet scriptura a M.^ proposita, 
quod A., ubicuuque mSe particula autecedentia^) comprehendit, compre- 
hendit ita, ut mhil iam addat, quo explicando aut iterando recurrat ad ea 
quae supra leguntur, aut minuat vim particulao ^Se.^) Locus autem 13 24 
milu videtur non modo ud adiuvaudam Schw. aut M. coniecturam per se 
mhil valere, sed potius induxisse lectorem quendam aut librarium, ut ad 
exphcanda verba »; (sc. e>,naia xmv) aiQatrjyuiv otiose sive in margine sive 
lu ipso coDtextu adscriberet ca ifu^vXca, cum loci sententiaui, ut vernacula 
lingua utar, recte huuc in modum intellexisset ,So (auf die eben, p. 12, 
13 - 14, 7 beschriebene Weise) ist also die ganze Geschichte der Volker' 
beziehungsweise Feldherrn eingeteilt. ' 

Qua ex versione apparet, ni fallor, eiectis verbis t^ i,x^>vXca requiri 
neque „ai neg.ie cSv ante acQacriyun: Sed ex omnibus id maxime me 

') cf. de signif. verb. 

2) cf. de pron. et K. II. p. 556 sqq. 



1 



> 



— 69 — 

oifendit in Schw. et M.2 coniecturis, quod speciem praebent, quasi ipsa 

bella civilia sg ^i^lovg divisa non fuerint. 

Quale iam evadit discrimen! Nonne potius exspectamus: ^wSe ^h 

sg a&vfj va ^sv aUa, rd S' Sfjicpvha sg avQavriyovg SqJQr^rai'' ? 

^ Quod frustra exspectamus, quia omnino antecedentia non expresso ilio 

discrimine repetere voluit A., sed comprehendere vocabulo (SSs ita, ut diceret: 

„Hoc modo, quem descripsi (hoc divisionis fundamento nisus) res gentium 

imperatorumve in libros divisi^ quae cum legisset interpolator, ,res impe- 

ratorum" explicavit additamento vd einqvXia.^) 

Sed iam redeamus ad particulam ij; quae pro comparativa sola non- 

nusquam legitur, ubi exspectamus ^dUov ij: 751, 13 Ucag ze xdfxvovatv 
avxolg sSoxec Sqav tl r^ ixei' dfjyCag hfia) Stacfd^aQpai. 829, 2 ev dxfijf 
f.i8ydXwv iau xivSvvtov ^fxlv xd ixellovva '^ rd ovva, Schwfo. 1036, 25 
l-iriSs ^QaSvTflTd xig riyeiaO^oa xijv SfinetQCav ij xaxvxrjxa, Schwrs. ^ xa^. 
contra Mu., Mfd. 662, 11 SoxoiaC fiot naQaaxc^^uxovxeg ij ixfiethaaofxevot 
xov dvSQa iiitYQdipat, Schwfc. fxdUov ^; cum 835, 19 exspectemus dUo 
ij, 852, 13 (Stfm.) dUoS^ev rj Postpositum leginius fiaUov 886, 3. 1171, 6. 
846, 13 (Mfo. in ^Y^nwv Se ofxcog Jolo^eUav eietv xiv axQaihv'Aviia- 
vCov fxdUov); fxdUov dUd pro fxdUov ij extat 899, 5 (Nfo.), alQelaO^at 
riQlv pro atQeta&at ij 937, 2 (cf. 934, 24), dU ij denique legimus 1032, 8, 
nX^v ij 1015, 12. 

Particulam fxev^) quoque 19 locis desideramus (e quibus 18 Mafo.), 
cf. 641,9 xat ot avv oQYfj TcaQijeaav dog dfxvvov fievot . xmv Se Qa^So 

^^'V«»^ 880, 18 dW MveCSiCe dxuQtaxCav ifiifxifexo Sk 1061, 2. 

709, 23. 990, 5, 1159, 13 cet. Contra 9 legi locos, quibus superflua vi- 
deretur esse (Mafo.), cf. 192, 3 ol Se omceQa xovxa,v Swdfxevot.. . . iuQ.a 
^evov, xrfv fxev dv^Yxr^v avxmv xat xijv iiQoaCQeaiv vuoSeixvvovxeg. 158, 1. 
774,21. 800,23 cet. 

Se pro Sr^ legimus 16 locis (quibus Mafo.), cf. 57:i, 14. 265,4 
27, 20. 808, 23 cet. 

1) In universum quideni A. caret interpolationibus ne^iue tamen desunt, quae 
iincis viri docti secluserint aut secludi voluerint; <iuales loci extant 35, e quibus cora- 
mcmoro 224, 26, ubi verba tovq v.aTaov.( itovq v.Tf:hmv M. recte in suspicionem vocassc 
apparet e comparatis locis 483, 2. 517, 4. 172, 3. 251, 17. 255, 27. 143, 23. 1096, 21. 
777, 1. 959, 2. 1053, 25. 1105, 10. 1180, 7 (cf. 506, 3. 333, 2. 560, 18. 233, 5. 260,' 24. 
345, 11); quibus intorpolationibus nescio an addenda sint verba 6ia to da&kvtg 349, 1, 
ola 'P(ofiaiG>v fiWi Kat ra yvvaia 22, 7, xal 'rtaQ avTo ^v xal dntXnvfXfvor 300, 1, fit> />' 
dv tv Toa^s (iaailevs 663, 1, 4 ra dTtoiiQijfiva 124, 12, quem locum tractabo, cum agam 
de verborum significatione. 

2) cf. Kaelker, p. 288. Stich, p. 207. 



— 60 — 

SOO .^°.t/J!;f.^^^''* ''"' '^'^''^ '"'=■?" <* '^^' 10«'« 739,19. 
6JJ, 5^ 361, 6 (Schwfm.) 443, 9 item, cum prodosis sit genetivus absolutus. 

Jam quod nonnusquam legimus de pro rs, zi pro ,5^, ot^wpro oiSL 
ovSs pioovTs, ft^,s pro ^rjSs, su pro ijS^, ,'rf, pro ,-„, haec confusio 
Appiano librarione sit attribuenda, fateor me haesitare 

. i" r !""''"*" ''^'""' ^^^' ^ ^*''" ^"« ^« ^ee<r/?««c, Mfm. in 
afte, aenyiitc. tw nct^ovcas, recte interpretatur) 1069,2 a« rovc sct 

X TofX ^^^' '^- ^'*' ^- '^'' '^- ^''' 13 (Mfo.?) 689, 18. 847 24, 

Sificat- 826 r ';'' '• ''■'' '■ '''' '^ '^*'™' ^^' 'p-*«-- -' 

bignmcat, SJb, 18 autem nescio an Mro. 

^ n^n idem est atque vvv yel vvv Sri (nostrum ,eben") 244, 9 {pAhava 
lisv UKoq avtovg ijStj ffaovdwv ^vXax^g ala»dvea»ai) 406, 10 (o»sv ijSv 
nolla xafivovvsg svsSCSocav ino rfjc dno^iag, Nfc. Sij) 7 aliis locis 

In ovSiv hi 561, 4 («ai rijv 4 «^i ;«e<rJye.ov m* novafiov E^wodtfiv, 
ovdsvsvtr^ Mt9^iSdzr, nQoatjxovca) non video cur oifenderit M.; inest 
certe hoc loco m lu notio non temporalis, sed localis ita ut significet, ex- 
ceai e hnibus quibusdam non temporis sed spatii. 

Particulam dXXd nonnusquam legimus ita positam, ut negationis 
pauUo antecedentis vim non contrarii quidquam introducendo minuat, sed 
ipsam narrationem continuet, quasi negatio non antecesserit: 1066, 14 x«« 

at noisig rjf^ow T^v'haXiav dnaaav smvsi,iaa»at tb ^yov, i^ sv dXlaig 
, .f*?' *^« '*^« ^'f^" ^'"'« Su,Qovtisvovi iftovv, xal d(,yvQwv ovx 

riv, aXXa avvavrsg dvd /xsQog kg rriv 'Pmnrjv s'»erjvavv, Mfc lacunam 

post aX>l«. _ 700, 10 xal xXrj»sk 4 HaQrvQ,av i KatoaQ od xarstnsv, 
aUa xai vors S^fiaQxov hg sm^ovXrjv rov KixfQmvog dnswrivs, cf. 230, 2 
(Mrs. contra It.) 073, II (Mfo.). 465, 13-15 (Mfo.). 

Jam particula dv, ut 856, I a M. recte videtur vocari in suspi- 
ciouem, ita locorum numero haud exiguo, qui est 16 (e quibus 15 Mafo ) 
nequaquam inserenda mihi videtur 820, 13 x«i ov'nors S snufuv»riv 
nQoSmaa,, uqIv Hd,xs ug inavsX.j 821, 16 iy^ /ih yaQ 6viag ys'Pwfiaiovg 
oiiiatnolXamg dao»avslv Usa9a, fiaXXov ij SovXsvstv . . . 592, 2 dQiarov 
xai (0(fsX,ftordrov, si sSvvaro nQ<xx»ijmt, ysvofisvov cet. 

23) De verborum significatione. 

De verborum significatione quaestionem ita instituam, ut primum, quae 
in umversum mihi videantur esse dicenda, proforam, deinde singula verba 
quorum sign ificationem aut significationis variationem observaverim, enumerem. 

1) M. coDfert Kr.i U. 42, 3, p. 204. 



> 



I 



— 61 — 

Primum igitur solet A. nonnusquam unam notionem exprimere duobus 
vel plunbus verbis, imprimis ita, ut duo substantiva ponat, fibi nos exsnec 
temus substantiviim cum adiectivo aut cum genetivo coni^nctum ^ 

Qualem figuram (h'v Std Svotv) exhibent loci: 

180, 18 avv oQyrj xat /Joj, cf. 802, 5. 

141, 27 inb Xtfiov xal Xoifiov xal xofirjg xal xQovov. 

184, 21 ra ,}' ivrog s^srsrd,fQsvro xai StsiXrjnro. 

11, 2 Si sv^ovXiav xai xQovov, Schw. Ni. Mfo. 

301, 23 xQov<p xai fisXsrri, cf. 408, 14. 

161, 8 noXifloig xai svrvxCatg, Schwfo. 
qon ^^^'^^ fj- ^"} ^"'Qvrdra "ocl avQara, xarayofio,, Schw. Mfo.; 

390, 1 non valet ad mutandum. 

679, 15 SsStorog rs xai ndaxovrog, Mfc. SsSQaxorog, quod si lege- 
remus, dubitaremus quodnam nd»og intellegendum esset; nd»og autem 
est roSsog cf. V. 7 et 8. Schwfv. ndaxovrog ,pericula haee subeuntis.' •) 

580, 8 SQoflov xal <pvYrjv. 606, 3 XQovq, xai Xtfta,. 
620, 3 naQQTjata^ofisvov rs xai Xsyovra. 
079, 13 fiST iXiov xai fiv^firjg. 

1098, 18 sv oipst oixrQti xai c'Jet« fisra^oX^. 

1161, 11 iv noXffio, xai »aXdaa;], Schw. Mfo. 

1178, 9 iv iansQoc xat xoTr^,. 

160, 22 xQovip vs xai avQarsiatg. 

747, 8 xtoQig alSovg xai naQayysXfmrog, Mfo 

_ _ Deinde quod attinet ad poetice dicta, in hanc rem aecuratius non 
inquisivi neque tamen, quae quidem mihi adnotaverim, dubito huc afferre. 
Constat igitnr, Appianum libenter uti locutionibus poeticis, imprimis antiquae 
et epicae dictioms^); occurrerunt autem mihi cum alia tum haec: 

62, 4 nsQixXvavog. 62, 18 noXvi^ivvfiog. 62, 7, 11 (173 6 199 10 
cet.) nsXayog 92, 19 dQtnQsn^. 160, 4. 175, 7 i>SvQsa»at. 160, 8 sLvv 

^loJofo^/ ""'''"''• 177,16.«w.W. 178,5«V.„,. 567,3 
r^Xsng 232, 12. 258, 5 nsQtmSvvog. 236, 10 vif,sa„. 241, 12 nsQt^vvf^og 

ta" T^T^' ^^^' ^^ '"'^''- ^' '^- 3*^^' 13 " **»'« P™ V^^- 
319, GnoXtg av»riaaaa. 163, 22 at adXmyysg ^xv^^av (Schrs. contra N.) 



1) Ceterum^ verba v«^(, airi.v suspicionem mihi movent propter antecedentia 
v^^ re a^mv avra>v Kal v«if aitoi; quamquam eicienda ea esse pro certo non affir- 
mavenm. ^ 

2) cf. Krebs p. 19 adn. et Sch. ad 163, 22. 



! 



|i 



ll 



1 



l^ 



r 



(i 



Ml 



— 62 — 

Jam pauca quae de singulis verbis observavi, deinceps proferam, 
ac primum quidem de substantivis, deinde de adiectivis etc. 

yvwfxri non solum sententiam significat, sed etiam factionem vel 
factionis studium, cf. 910, 15 (cfdoTtti6zc.Tov ^dxelvov 4 ^n^ KaCaa^og 
yvwfiTiv ifavtvva, Mfc. ixvi]fxriv. An yvm^riv delendum, suppleto doxnv?) 
1016, 22 yvf^iiriv SrjfioxQavix^g Siavoiag ^). 1100, 2. 1090, 6 rogationem 
legemve 663, 19 aliis, consilium 1107 aliis, sententiam 872, 23 aliis. 

^ovXevcriQtov omnibas aliis locis sedem senatus significat, solo loco 
798, 21 senatus conventum. 

XQnfia pro nXrld^og legimus 45, 9 (xQW^ KsXtoov). 
HolQa non modo momentum significat, sed etiam factionem, cf. 
1049, 12 ovve rfjg Mdyvov nofinritov fioiQag, 925, 11 vovg re zfjg 
evavuag fioiQag vvv ye fiem^rjaea^ai. 911, 8. 1174, 16. 1175, 19. 

XQovog et longinguitatem significat (8, 5. 582, 19. 10, 2) et vetus- 
tatem (263, 20 KaQxrjScvog aihrjg-sc. nsQi — xqovov xal nXrj&ovg xal 
Svvafiewg. 292, 20) et certum terminum (303, 12 sarai Ss . . xQovog ^Qta- 
fievog, iv qj — Sca&rjaovvai) et, plurali numero positum, singulos temporis 
terminos (12, 15). xQovov ^xeiv extat 1138, 6. 

dmavia, dntavog cet. significant et suspicionem et perfidiam et incre- 
dibilitatem, cf. 183, 19 eg dntavtav r«> nQoveQov elQrjfxfvwv. 205, 13 
dntavog eg ^xav^Qovg yevofxevog. 220, 8 vm sg vovg aQxovvag dntavtav 
vov Srjfxov. 298, 18 oi? yaQ vtva StdXvatv nQoaeS6xcov, dntava nQ^veQot 
xeXevaavveg, Mrs. 321, 1 Mrs.2) 62, 15. 183, 18, 22. 192, 24. 246, 4. 

In met^tg vocabulo 582, 25 (vavva ve Srj xal ^dg inl xovvolc vow 
Stxa^ovvwv ineCeetg ov (fSQovveg) Mfo ; «buiusmodi molestias et rerum iudi- 
catarum praeproperas executiones non ferentes" Scbwrv.; ceterum cf 619 19 
^ 639, 7. 646, 10. 734, 18. 740,24. 778, 5. 854, 15. 863, 4. 913, 6 940 2 
946, 8. 1026, 7. 1043, 22. 1130, 9. 1144, 14. • ' • 

Jam agam de significatione vocabuli dnoxQrjfivog accuratius trac- 
tans locum 124, 12; puto enim interpolata esse verba ig vd dnoxQr^fxva 
quae iteratione, quae insit, molesta verborum ig dn6xQrjfxva valde turbent 
totam penodum praesertim cum enuntiato primaria incipiat ab ipso demum 
vocabulo neQtifo^wg, ita ut quasi uno tenore inter se cohaereant verba eg 
dn6xQrifua et eg vd dnoxQrjfiva. Accedit, quod ne idem quidem utroque 
loco significare potest vocabulum dnoxQyfxva, quod Schw. mihi videtur 
seasisse, cum vertit «eodemque die, tertio conflictu, Romanis in praerupta 

1) cf. de sfenetivo. 

2) cf. de ellipsi. 



\ 



— 63 — 

loca compulsis, multi ex iis et pedites et equites cum equis per praeci- 
pitia detrusi sunt«. Neque tamen recte vertendo discrimen expressit. 
Nam si modo (quamvis artificiose) locum interpretari volumus, facere non 
possumus, quin dnoxQrjfxva vocabulum, quod apud A. ut omnino sive pro 
substantivo sive pro adiectivo usurpatum significet loca praerupta, declivia, 
ardua, praecipitia i). versu 10 intellegamus loca praerupta (schluchtenreiches,' 
abschussiges Terrain), versu 12 singulos locos praeruptos (Abhange). Sin 
autem utroque loco idem significatur, exspectamus post xavecoaav non ^c 

rd dnoxQrjfiva, sed sg (vdg) cfdQayyag (cf. 112, 13. 124,4. 609, 19. 
608, 6. 288, 5. 368, 8) vel dno (xavd) vwv (dno—) xQrjfxvcdv (cf. 540,'l2)' 
Quod mihi concedet, quicumque comparaverit locos 318, 6 (vo dn6xQrjfirov 
ig 8...dvsfiatvov)et 158,13 (dvco nQbg vd dn^xQrjfxva, cf. 158,16 
dvenrjSa)v snt zovg xQrjfxvovg), 

Jam vero, ut rem comprehendondo diudicemus, si sg dnoxQrifiva 
significat sursum, exspectamus xavFcoaav dno t(ov dnoxQrjfxv(ov vel xavd 
Tmv xQrifxvcov; sin autem significat deorsum (velut 581,9), verba sg Ta 
dn6xQrifxva aus molestam .exhibent iterationem aut artificiosa egent inter- 
pretatione. 

Quae cum ita sint, equidem ^c rd dn6xQr]fiva eiecerim; quod cuui 
facio,^ non nego, vd dn^xQr^fxva significare posse singulos locos praeruptos, 
1. e. idem fere atque cfdQayyeg vel ^d^aa^Qa; immo idem significat 390, 2; 
hoc solum contendo, Appianum, si quid addidisset, additurum non fulsse 
verba sg vd dnfjxQrjfiva, quippe quae molestam exhibuissent iterationem et 
mutationem significationis artificiosam. 

Locus autem 389, 25 - 390, 1, ubi paullo post oqcjc dn^xQrjfivcjv le- 
gimus s^sntnTov ig Ta dncjxQrjfxva xal xavecfSQcjvvo , mea^e coniecturae 
non repugnat; nam plane gemellus non est, praesertim cum'adiectivum 
dnc^xQrifxvov repetatur substantivo dn^xQrjfiva. — 

Sed iam pauca addam de significatione pronominis dXXog; 
quod saepius ita extat, ut significet praeterea aut omnino aut ne verten- 
dum quidem sit^), cf. 659, 7 6vt.... tcov S^ ^x^qcov ovSevog sg saxavcn^ 

1) cf. 103,18,22. 255,14. 158,3,13. 288, 4. 149, 14. 318, G. 386,21 387 10 
389, 26. 390, 2. 479. 24. 536, 14. 914, 6. 1027, 10. x„roi legimus 300, 19 299* 26* 
117,21. 158,16,25. 540,12. 480,3,6,14,22. 609,10. 833,17. 981,24 'lOOl' lo" 
1022, 22. 1025, 17. 1038, 10. 1134, 2. 481, 22, quo loco deleverim ^,, «,',.1. suppletis 
verbis es T«i;g KQri^voi^s, respiciens locos 390, 1 et 1001, 10-12, pro inepto additamento 
quod 81 recte fecero, adiuvabit haec coniectura alteram de loco 124, 12 prolatam 
H^jWg legitur 820, 25. 841, 14, ^re^.K^^^.og 539, 21. 540, 17. 1024, 17, ^ar^^^ro, 

2) cf. Kr. § 50, 4, 11. K. U. 235, 1. § 405, b, 2, c, adn. 1. Wi. p. 493. § 59. 



\i 






— 64 — 

xorxoi? gu-cferac, dUd ^al vov, crrgaTrjyovs ij tafiCa, i} t,hagy,ov,, ^ oaot 

" '"'7<rr'r. f? ^'''' "''^*'*'''««-- l»««Ae.W^„,, Mfm. in &not. 
1040 1 ^iS^ ^auaxor, aXXa Tatj Sexa ixeveaeQaronsSevov ineo 

266, 16 Zaoi z^g yegovariag ij' T^g iiUrjc ndXsmg. 

576,3. 664,13.7,12. 864,6'), 567,20^883,25.889,17 891 14 
923, 10. 973, 13 (cf. 974, 11) 988. 7. 1023, 5. 1078, 21 
_ In loco 107 11 (nagd re r&g orrjXag rag 'Hga^XeCovg rdv ^^eavov 
aneea,v x«. ot ,xev ry dXXr,v Ai§v^v ^areaxov, oi <J' 0;<a,. nohv inoXc 
oQ^ovv) ,ob ambiguitatem iUam nominis 'HQa.Xemv arrjX^r' difficillimo 
Schw>ro. p. 271, non recte ex aXXrjv effecit, Ocilen oppidum fuisse Afri- 
canum, quod, si A>^i'ijv retinemus, sequitur potius e v. 13—16 Sen- 
tentiam autem a Schw. • postulatam ,Lusitanos iUos, expugnata Conistorgi, 
n^vibus Oceanum ad fretum usque superasse aut per ipsum etiam fretum 
e«e transvectos ibique locorum excensione facta partim agros Komanae 
dictionis depopnlatos esse, partim Ocilen urbem obsedisse" quominus acci- 
piamus, stat per solum, ni faUor, vocabulum Atfivr,v, quod nescio an sit 

8^9«'"^« S cl"^'" !*'' ^""^' '^^^^^tiore inquisitione (cf. etiam 13. 7. 
oo, Jb. 6o, 26, 80, 9 cet.). 

Jam restant loci 149, 2 ^AwC^ag Si... ,at oC ^er' airov aXXoc 
Kaaxrjdovmv re ,«. Pa,,xaC<ov arqarr^yol. 156, 63 ra Sk M^voa e'H rmv 

163, 3. 172, 8. 180, 5. 192, 14. 208, 23. 571, 18. 731, 11. Loco 567, 3 
(a<,ayatr^v ev noalv iyCyvovro vrjXeetg, xai aXX,ov . . neoyga^aC) Nfm ; 
mtercedit emm oppositio quaedam inter r£v iv noaiv et SXxIv 

»«f;<ie'amu «^o. 628, 24 TC^,,,6v re .ai n.acvearov .ai Zaa. 
W^iVa.% et 341, 11 ^ Sk ne,ael ^^. i.ne.,Cvaro 'P.,.aC.v d^Cag 
'ZfxaCoTg *" ""*• '' '"' ""' Ma^eS6vag .ai iavrov inngerpece 

„t .rl' '''^''^'^ significatione pauca observavi neque tamen tam gravia, 
«t proferenda m.hi ea esse animum inducam; ceterum iis quoque confir: 
matur Appiani vanetas. 



1) cf. 671, 16. 597, 5 et de gen. obj. 

2) cf. de particula f 



^ -f 



I 



KV 



— 65 — 

24) De verborum structura, 

De verborum structura in universum dicendum est, hinc quoque 
apparere varietatem et inconstantiam Appianeam; quod demonstrant, 
quae observavi de singulis verbis; quae sunt haec^): 

fi€i;au^€(T^ai et cum Ttgog legimus coniunctum et cum sg absolute 
positum (236, 17. 246, 13. 925, 11) et cum genetivo (752, 24 Cobfm 
Schr. confert 867, 7). '' 

x€X€v€iv saepissime cum accusativo coniunctum legitur, cum dativo 
nonnusquam. 

nQo/,afx^av€/,v et u et uva secum habet et absolute ponitur. 
no?.€^€iv plerumque cum dativo coniungitur, cum accusativo 6 locis^) 
(891, 5. 1111, 23. 196, 26. 198, 25. 1050, 11. 667, 5, quibus Mafo.). 
€TiLvq(^X€iv modo accusativum secum habet modo dativum. 
d(faiQ€iaOa,: uva zi saepius extat, item d(p. pro passivo (cum gen.), 

Cum acc, «>. Ttvog xi, za aqmQ^&h^za 1038, 24, dwatQ€la{>at T.va 

cum ^^' et inf. 235, 13. 

dTtoYfyvc6(ix€Lv modo cum acc. legitur, modo cum genetivo, modo cum 
mfinitivo (930, 12. 284, 2. 704, 18.), modo pro passivo (909, 21). 

xa&aQog, xa^aiQ€Lv, x«&aQ€v€Lv et cum genet. extant et cum dno 
et genet. (687, 14) et cum ^x (431, 8, vHfm. Sch. cft. Dionem Cass. 
37, 24, 2). 

(f^dv€Lv legimus et cum u et cum uvd et cum inf. et absolute aut 
cum participii nominativo coniunctum. 

vn€Q0Qdv cum gen., cum acc, cum inf extat, vn^QOQaa^at ino 
986, 1. 136, 22. * 

^LdC^a^aL propassivo legitur 864, 27, pro medio et intransitivo 591 16 
aliis, pro medio et transitivo 257, 20. - ' 

inLVQon€V€Lv c acc 887, 10 (cf. 1140, 20), c gen. 1067, 22. 
Jam, aliis omissis, adiciam singulas constructiones mentione dignas: 

1040, 19 dva^aiV€Lv to n€QLT€iyLafia, 
544, 20 vn€Qaly€LV TLvog. 

1016, 11 (^La^€LvaL cum duplici accusativo. 

1120, 19 €(fOQfJl€LV TT^V dxTtjv. 

1029, 9 dnoT€fiea^at uvd tl. 

192, 26 aLTLav €f.ifidU€Lv, Schwirs., Mfo.; cf. 578, 8! 200 6' 296 7 
301^4^, 5. 382, 28. 374, 5. 379, 10, 14. 458, 6. 915, 6.' 

1) Loci cum ad unamquamque ferc structuram pertineant permulti, eos ita fere 
non aiferam, ut satis habeam structuras commemorasse. 

2) cf. Stich p. 152 et de accus. 

5 



j^ ^ 



- 6^ — 

499, 2 xaTakotdooelv tiva, 

81, 25 hg inr^xooviXavvea\ cf. 318, 20. 401, 12. 504, 15. 1006,24. 
736, 3! 

939, 26 im^aCveiv xaJq dTioiataig , cf. 840,15. 880,9! 630,3. 
265, 2. 54, 8. 

Postremo loco adiimgam locos, qiii raagnum praebeant verborum 
ambitum: 199, 21. 175, 16. 167, 25. 235, 23. 243, 2. 580, 5. 268, 7 cet. 

(Orationes leguntur cum alibi tum 234, 13. 237, 17. 241, 4. 245, 24. 
263, 23. 265, 18. 629, 13. 272, 11. 500, 18. 492, 12). 



25) De verborum coUocatioiie. 

In verbis collocandis ad magnani A. progressus est licentiam, negle- 
gentiam, variationem, imprimis in pai-ticulis: 

T€ igitur saepius non verbum, quo pertinet, sequitur, sed aliud verbum ^), 
cf. 752, 21 &ni xaxoj tb avrov xal icov avvov dvarrefd-ovriav , quales 

locos legi 17 (e quibus 13 Mafo.): item ,u6r 7 locis (bis Mafo.), cf 454, 4 

Mii^QMxr^g fih ^aaUevet, jiQOGxfxir^vat (Jf ; item ()t 8 locis (bisMfo.), 

cf. 844, 10 Tov "/^(jovov S& pro tov 6e yjjovov^ 601, 2 ot ^liahwvat <5' 
pro ot ^ ^iiahMTai. 88, 18 (M-fm.: comma post hyttv delendiim, ponendum 
ante TTaqd) 1030, 15 ojc do^dixhvog b' €tyev pro wc S^ d^^df^ievog eiyev, 
aliae particulae 483, 15. 451, 19. 700, 10. 797, 2. 823, 21. 1123, 7 (qui- 
bus locis Mfo.); cf. etiam 601, 16 cum 276, 15.2) 

of.i(jog cum participio coniunctum id non modo sequitur, sed 

etiam praecedit: 655,20 TQtafxvQfovg oimg tzt iyoov bgevye, et 

444, 11 ofidog (5' avra. ^gaSvvovft avvetg 6 veaviaxog &g koyovg 7J/.^eVi 
eO^iXovu xdxeiv(p, Schw. Mfo. Schwfv., sententia enim inest haec: „quam- 
quam aliquid suspicatus est, tamen, quia ille morabatur, cum eo collocutus 
esf*, cf. locum 320, 16 (Schw. Mfo.), ubi (Laavroog non ad tdovieg pertinet, 
sed ad e^enylSon'. 

Idem cadit in locum 781 , 8 {xal o 2xt7ii(ov aihog «>*« ^A(fgavi(t), 
ndvca fied^eig, ^(fevyev)^ quem M. recte intellexit, non recte vocavit in 
suspicionem; neque enim deleto commate ante ndvza opus iam est mutatione. 

Nec magis recte offendit M. in vocabulo evd^vg ante participium 
posito 742, 14, qui locus prorsus aeque sit comparatus atque ii, quos 
modo rettuli. 



1) cf. K. p. 789, 5, d. Kaelker, p. 287. 

2) cf. Kaelker, p. 259. 



— 67 



Jam mentione digni sunt loci 178, 19 {elxe d^eov nagdyovvog avvov 
del ftjc xat vove). 433,17. 313, 11. 470, 10. 663, 3. 752, 7. 938, 2 (qui- 
bus Mafo.), ubi dei insolitam exhibet coUocationem; quam et ipsam par- 
ticulae svt 391, 7 {m dij xal fxdXtava nQOvka^e vov nekdyovg bvt 'Poo- 
fiaicov dvanetQoopifvoiiv) non est quod denegemus. 

Quam particulam, cum xal et vvv coniunctam, magna cum varietate 
videmus collocari; legimus enim tvt xal vvv 246, 1, xal ht vvv 347, 4, 
xal vvv evt 250, 4. 553, 10. 430. 5. 489, 21. 1012, 3; quibus locis nisus 
238, 7 inter xal et evt inseruerim vvv, quod postulet sententiarum conexus 
et quod facillime potuerit intercidere, repudiata scriptura codicum deterio- 
rum ^) evt xal vvv; (ceterum ad hanc coniecturam impugnandam nihil 
valet evt xat 668, 2); eadem vi legimus evt vvv et x(d vvv multis locis, 
sg evt vvv extat 949, 19. 

Jam ut mittamus particulas, nonnusquam apud Appianum usu venit, 
ut vocabulum, quod suum locum habet extra enuntiatum quod- 
dam relativum, legatur intra id enuntiatum, quod apparet e locis 
456, 3 {i^v Se xai vecov avoXog avvotg, ov negt Bv^avvtov . . . fiyovvvo pro 
oTo/og avvotg ne(jt B. or.) 667, 8. 847, 16. 944, 2. 365, 11 (ter Mafo.). 

Permultis deinde locis genetivus aivov vel avv(^tv praecedit 
substantivum , quo pertinet, minus magisve longe, cf. 986, 23 {bxonvev 
avvov To ver/og TJdrj xat badlevei^ 214, 22 {bvd^(c vtg avvov vov ^i'- 
qaxog Innov b^akev), 172, 24 (GrH., Ni. , Schfm. , cf. etiam 475, 5 et 
297, 7); quales loci mihi occurrermit 19 (ter Mafo., 246, 7 Rrc); omnino 
libenter videtur genetivum A. anteponere, cf. 192, 16. 453, 9 (Rfo. in 
vf^g dnoxQiaeoog vijv dnoQiav) 950, 25 (Schwfo.). 951, II (Mfo.). 1108, 20. 
1106, 2. 1121, 2. 

Locis autem 789, 12, 13 (Mfo., vov nodijg dependet a vagaov)^) et 
624, 7^) genetivus, ut non praecedit, ita longissime abest a nomine 
unde dependeat; quale spatium A. solet interponere etiam inter avT(jv 
vel avvovg et verbum quo referendum sit, ita tamen ut accusativus prae- 
cedat, cf. 196, 14. 91, 28! 73, 23! 434, 7. 515, 11. 542, 10. 549, 17. 
614, 8! 965, 22 (Mfo.)^). Similiter comparati sunt loci 853, 20. 951, 15 
(Mfo.). 543, 1 (Nfo.) 871, 20 (Nfo.) 866, 5—6, quibus genetivus longius 
solito praecedit verbum, a quo dependet. 

Tum avvov {— wi^) legitur inter articulum et substantivum. 



1) de quibus cf. M. I. p. XVII. 

2) cf. de acc. abs. 

3) cf. de gen. obj. et de art. 

4) 65, 8 huc non pertinet; servandum enim est avTHr, cf. de ellipsi. 



— 68 — 

cui attributum siti): 8, 12 {neQi rf^c avvov ^hv^eQia::) 442, 4. 670, 14 
744,22). : 

Loco 242. 18 extant verba vov^ 'haXo.v 'Avvf^fx TiQoa^ef.i^vovg pro 
ntakitiv Tovg 'Avvi^rx TiQoa^efievovg, 709, 10 rwr ug TzeQi avrc otxtov 
pro Tig TMV n. a. olxtov vel r. tt, d. oYxon' zig, 

Porro nd'/.iaTa quoque longius solet abesse a verbo. quo pertinet, 
cf. 560, 26 {TeaaaQdxovra Sio heai fidhaTa y.a^e/.ovveg) alios. Pro- 
nomen exaavog substantivum modo praecedit modo sequitur. 

Chiasmum praebent loci 571,18,19. 720.5. 880.4. 241.20 
(cf. 245, 5) 687, 24 - 688, 1. 973, 7^). 

Sed haec omnia mentione haud fere videntur esse digna respicienti 
eos locos, quos iam enumerabo, ubi tam variae et mirae inveniantur 
verborum collocationes , ut certae condiciones aut leges ex eis non appa- 
reant, nisi quod verba quae inter se coliaerent, miro modo inter se inter- 
dum disiunguntur, cf. 268, 20 e/ ^f r eaT, xal Toiv TTQiheQov e^Qr^f.ievo,v 
tTi TiQog vfiag, oj Po^iiaioe, /.oyog. 

927, 15 cd xmiaTa Se avveve/^r^vai xekeiaag, (m6aa 

TCQOTeQov avTolg eueyeyQanzo. 

954, 3 eig aTied-ave Tiok/.ovg aTioxvefvag. 

999, 14 fiaxQo&ev, maTieQ ev lolg dyoiai, avv Soofio) xal ^o^ fxeveifeQev, 

1029, 4 dcfi^Qervo Se rr^v oiLnv tov eQyov Tovg nohixhvg 6 Tiecf vxoog 
eri Sf^vae dficfl Tf; dwSo), ubi equideuj 6 ante dfi(f} suppleverim neque 
tamen inseruerim ^). 484, 22 (^v pertinet non ad 'Pomaroi, sed ad eave 
sc. t^fxelg, cf. 264, 13. 893, 14. 983, 20, 21). 949, 3 (exspectamus ..rc xar 
^AvTwvfov (og xaTa TVQdvvov Uyovg avyyQd(fO)v'^); quo accedunt, quos, 
ne longus fiam, verbis non exscribo, loci hi: 1020,21. 1047 11 1072 
4, 5. 1077, 22. 1108, 14. 1143, 25. 1149, 9. 1179, 7, 8. 212, 25 (Mrs.) 
524,8. 818,12. 777,1. 767,2 (comma delendum). 849,10 858 4 
899, 24. 804, 1. 901, 6. 908, 3. 1084, 14. 1087, 3, 5 (ec = oTiLe). 
1101, 24. 1108, 8 (noli fieTa to^v ev^c6vo)v inserere ante o/c) 1058 25 
492, 20. 744, 2, 3. 659, 23 (Cobfm. in ^TeQotg to3v ovto)v). 861. 1 777 4' 
1127, 3. 152, 21. 192, 21. 288, 8. 476, 23; quorum e locorum numero 
29 sunt, quibus Mafo. — 

1) cf. Kaelker p. 257. 

2) cf. Stich p. 162. 
8) cf. Stich p. 207. 
*) cf. de art. 

^) cf. de particulis et de eU. 



m